Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-hill Series Economics)
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-hill Series Economics)
9th Edition
ISBN: 9781259290619
Author: Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 10, Problem 1CACQ

a

To determine

To find:Each player’s dominant strategy.

a

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Tabular presentation of player 1 and 2 game.

    Player 2
    Player 1   D E F
    A -200,150 350,100 -50,600
    B 200,-300 400,400 300,100
    C -150,200 -250,550 750,-350

Dominant strategy is the selection of move in the game which pays the maximum payoff given other player strategy.

According to the table,

    Selection by Player 2 Reaction of player 1
    D B
    E B
    F C

It is noted that, when player 2 selects D, for getting the maximum payoff, player 1 selects B. Similarly, If E is selected by 2nd player, 1 will choose B and so on. Thus, no dominant strategy exists for player 2 as player 2 choices rely on player 1 moves.

Thus, dominant strategy does not occur as players do not have independent moves.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

Dominant strategy is the selection of move in the game which pays the maximum payoff given other player strategy.

b)

To determine

To ascertain: Each player secure strategy.

b)

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

According to the game, there are various moves available for player second.

When player 2 choses strategy D, Player 1 has two options, that is, strategy A and C. With selection of A strategy, worst outcome is $-200 and at strategy C, worst outcome is -150.

When player 2 choses strategy E, player 1 has a worst outcome of -50 when strategy E is selected.

When player 2 choses strategy F, Player 1 has two options, that is, strategy A and C. With selection of A strategy, worst outcome is -50 and at strategy C, worst outcome is -350.

To get the secure strategy, maximum payoff available which is $200, $400 or $300 when strategy B is selected. Hence, strategy B is considered as secure strategy for player 1.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

A strategy is secure when any deviation from player 2 does not affect the payoff of player 1 having no dominant strategy.

c)

To determine

To ascertain: The Nash equilibrium.

c)

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Nash equilibrium occurs when both players are maximizing their payoffs given other player’s move.

Therefore, Nash equilibrium occurs when player A choses B strategy while player B choses strategy E which gives payoff equal to each player.

Therefore, the Nash equilibrium in the game is (B,E).

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

Nash equilibrium is a stable state in which different participants interact each other, in which no participant gain unilaterally, if strategy of other remains unchanged.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
General Accounting Question solution and give me Blank ? C
It is possible to use transformational leadership strategies to reach unethical objectives.  Traditional leadership theories and morals standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues. For the statement above, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statements.
Discuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781544336329
Author:Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Text book image
Microeconomics A Contemporary Intro
Economics
ISBN:9781285635101
Author:MCEACHERN
Publisher:Cengage
Text book image
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Microeconomic Theory
Economics
ISBN:9781337517942
Author:NICHOLSON
Publisher:Cengage