Database Systems: Design, Implementation, & Management
11th Edition
ISBN: 9781285196145
Author: Steven, Steven Morris, Carlos Coronel, Carlos, Coronel, Carlos; Morris, Carlos Coronel and Steven Morris, Carlos Coronel; Steven Morris, Steven Morris; Carlos Coronel
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
Chapter 10, Problem 11P
Program Plan Intro
Pessimistic locking:
It is one of the locking methods in concurrency control. The lock exists in the transaction until the transaction gets committed or rolled back.
Two-phase locking protocol:
It defined the serializability of the transaction but not prevent deadlocks. The process of locking and unlocking can be done using two phases in this protocol. They are: Growing phase and shrinking phase.
Growing phase:
New lock can be occurred on the transaction without unlocking the data items. The data items are locked in this phase.
Shrinking phase:
This phase used to release all transaction but not provide new lock on the transaction.
Row-level lock granularity:
This row-level locking process used to lock the single row in the table. It is used to improve the availability of data and involving in transaction conflict.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
What does it mean for a database to be in a stable state? While the database management system may give a symbolic meaning for a transaction, there is no assurance that it faithfully captures the underlying real-world event. What consequences may be expected if this ban were implemented? Explain your point using an illustration. Should we take at face value the apparent meaning of the phrase "serializable transactions"?
Suppose the deferred modification technique is used in a database.
a. Is the old-value part of an update log record required any more? Why or why not?
b. If old values are not stored in update log records, transaction undo. Is clearly not feasible. How
would the redo-phase of recovery have to be modified as a result?
C.
Deferred modification can be implemented by keeping updated data items in local memory of
transactions, and reading data items that have not been updated directly from the database
buffer. Suggest how to efficiently implement a data item read, ensuring that a trans action sees
its own updates.
When the application of an optimistic approach to concurrency control is implemented, it is frequently observed that transactions experience prolonged durations for completion. Explain?
Chapter 10 Solutions
Database Systems: Design, Implementation, & Management
Ch. 10 - Prob. 1RQCh. 10 - Prob. 2RQCh. 10 - Prob. 3RQCh. 10 - Prob. 4RQCh. 10 - Prob. 5RQCh. 10 - Prob. 6RQCh. 10 - Prob. 7RQCh. 10 - Prob. 8RQCh. 10 - Prob. 9RQCh. 10 - Prob. 10RQ
Ch. 10 - Prob. 11RQCh. 10 - Prob. 12RQCh. 10 - Prob. 13RQCh. 10 - Prob. 14RQCh. 10 - Prob. 15RQCh. 10 - Prob. 16RQCh. 10 - Prob. 17RQCh. 10 - Prob. 1PCh. 10 - Prob. 2PCh. 10 - Prob. 3PCh. 10 - Prob. 4PCh. 10 - Prob. 5PCh. 10 - Prob. 6PCh. 10 - Prob. 7PCh. 10 - Prob. 8PCh. 10 - Prob. 9PCh. 10 - Prob. 10PCh. 10 - Prob. 11P
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, computer-science and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- An answer to this question: What does it mean to have a stable database state? There is no guarantee that the transaction's symbolic meaning accurately represents the underlying real-world event provided by the database management system. What would be the ramifications of such a prohibition? Using a specific example, explain what you mean. Does the term "serializable transactions" really mean what it appears to?arrow_forwardExplain the concept of conflict-avoidance and its application in concurrency control, with reference to techniques like Strict Two-Phase Locking and Serializable Snapshot Isolation.arrow_forwardIn the 2PL algorithm we considered, a transaction can't start until it has acquired all the locks it needs (we call this, Conservative 2PL). There is a different scheme possible, where a transaction does NOT need to wait for all its locks - it can start its transactions before all the locks have been acquired. What would be good about such a scheme, and, what would be bad? Do feel free to illustrate with a diagram.arrow_forward
- In a database transaction, the two main operations are READ and WRITE operations. So, there is a need to manage these two operations in the concurrent execution of the transactions as if these operations are not performed in an interleaved manner, and the data may become inconsistent. Consider the following scheduled transactions T1, T2, T3, and T4. T1 T2 T3 T4 Reads(X) Writes(X) Reads(Y) Writes(Y) Commit Reads(X) Time Reads(X) Writes(X) Reads(Y) Rollback Writes(Y) Writes(X) Commit • Identify all pair of transactions based on the occurred problem between two transactions (specify pairs, e.g., T1 => T2; T3=> T2; T3 =>T4; etc.). • Specify the name of a problem for each detected pair of transactions. • Justify the occurred problem for each pair of transactions.arrow_forwardConsider a multi-granularity locking system, with lock modes S, X, IS, IX, and SIX as in lecture and database-level, file-level, page-level and record-level locking as shown in the following figure. Provide the sequence of lock requests required to perform the following transactions and write necessary complete Lock and Unlock operations in their correct order. T3 want to read all pages in F1 and modify about 10 pages, which can be identified only after reading F1.(MY ANSWER) Lock-SIX(DB); Lock-S(F1); Lock-X(P1); Lock-X(P1000); Unlock(P1000); Unlock(P1); Unlock(F1); Unlock(DB); is it corect? ………………………………………………………………………………………arrow_forwardSuppose the deferred modification technique is used in a database.a. Is the old value part of an update log record required any more?Why or why not? b. If old values are not stored in update log records, transaction undo isclearly not feasible. How would the redo phase of recovery have to bemodified as a result?c. Deferred modification can be implemented by keeping updated dataitems in local memory of transactions and reading data items that havenot been updated directly from the database buffer. Suggest how to efficientlyimplement a data item read, ensuring that a transaction sees itsown updates.d. What problem would arise with the above technique if transactions performa large number of updates?arrow_forward
- Explain the concept of serializability in the context of concurrency control. How is it different from other forms of consistency, such as linearizability or strict two-phase locking?arrow_forwardWhat exactly is deadlock? What can be done to avoid it? When it occurs, how can it be resolved?arrow_forwardWe are given the following transaction schedule, where A,B,C are the addresses of the records in the database and T1 and T2 are the transactions. T1 R(A) W(A) R(B) W(B) R(C) W(C) COMMIT T2 R(C) R(B) W(B) a) Show that using strict two-phase locking leads to complications b) For example a, draw a »waits-for<< graph c) Resolve the problems in example a, using the "Wound-Wait" protocol R(A) W(A) W(C) COMMITarrow_forward
- Consider a multi-granularity locking system, with lock modes S, X, IS, IX, and SIX as in lecture and database-level, file-level, page-level and record-level locking as shown in the following figure ( picture bellow ) I want to get "T3 want to read all pages in F1 and modify about 10 pages, which can be identifiedonly after reading F1."arrow_forwardProvide a high-level intuition for why log records for transactions on the undo-list must be processed in reverse order, whereas redo is performed in a forward direction. What can go wrong if the undo-list is processed in a forward direction or redo is performed in a backward order?arrow_forwardSuppose you wish to create an audit trail of changes to the takes relation. Can the preceding implementation guarantee that updates made by a malicious database administrator (or someone who manages to get the administrator’s password) will be in the audit trail? Explain your answer.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Database Systems: Design, Implementation, & Manag...Computer ScienceISBN:9781305627482Author:Carlos Coronel, Steven MorrisPublisher:Cengage Learning
Database Systems: Design, Implementation, & Manag...Computer ScienceISBN:9781285196145Author:Steven, Steven Morris, Carlos Coronel, Carlos, Coronel, Carlos; Morris, Carlos Coronel and Steven Morris, Carlos Coronel; Steven Morris, Steven Morris; Carlos CoronelPublisher:Cengage Learning
Database Systems: Design, Implementation, & Manag...
Computer Science
ISBN:9781305627482
Author:Carlos Coronel, Steven Morris
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Database Systems: Design, Implementation, & Manag...
Computer Science
ISBN:9781285196145
Author:Steven, Steven Morris, Carlos Coronel, Carlos, Coronel, Carlos; Morris, Carlos Coronel and Steven Morris, Carlos Coronel; Steven Morris, Steven Morris; Carlos Coronel
Publisher:Cengage Learning