Concept explainers
Videos
The following story is true except that all names have been changed and the time period has been compressed:
Charles Austin graduated from a prestigious business school and took a job in a public accounting firm in Atlanta. A client hired him after five years of normal progress through the ranks of the accounting firm. This client was a rapidly growing, publicly held company that produced software for the health care industry. Charles started as assistant controller. The company promoted him to controller after four years. This was a timely promotion. Charles had learned a lot and was prepared to be controller.
Within a few months of his promotion to controller, the company’s chief financial officer abruptly quit. Upon submitting her resignation, she walked into Charles’s office and said, “I have given Holmes (the company president) my letter of resignation. I’ll be out of my office in less than an hour. You will be the new chief financial officer, and you will report directly to Holmes. Here is my card with my personal cell phone number. Call me if you need any advice or if I can help you in any way.”
Charles was in over his head in his new job. His experience had not prepared him for the range of responsibilities required of the company’s chief financial officer. Holmes, the company president, was no help. He gave Charles only one piece of advice: “You have lots of freedom to run the finance department however you want. There is just one rule: Don’t ever cross me. If you do, you’ll never work again in this city.” Charles believed his boss could follow through on that threat because he was so well-connected in the Atlanta business community.
The end of the company’s fiscal year came shortly after Charles’s promotion to chief financial officer. After reviewing some preliminary financial amounts, Holmes stormed into Charles’s office and made it clear that the results were not to his liking. He instructed Charles to “find more sales.” Charles was shocked, but he did as he was told. He identified some ongoing software installation work that should not have been recorded as revenue until the customer signed off on the job. Charles recorded the work done as of year-end as revenue, even though the customer had not signed off on the job. He sent an invoice to the customer for the amount of the improper revenue, then called her to say that the invoice was an accounting error and she should ignore it.
Next year, Charles’s work life was better but his personal life was not. He went through a costly divorce that resulted in limited time spent with his two small children. Now he was particularly concerned about not crossing his boss because of the threat that he would never work in Atlanta if he did. He could not bear to look for a new job that would take him away from his children. Further, it would be difficult to find a job anywhere that came close to paying the salary and benefits of his current job. With high alimony and child support payments, Charles would feel a dire financial strain if he had to take a cut in pay.
The company struggled financially during the year. Clearly, the company would not generate the level of revenues and income that Holmes wanted. As expected, he again instructed Charles to find some way to dress up the income statement. It did not matter to Holmes whether what Charles did was legal or not.
Charles had exhausted all legitimate ways of reducing costs and increasing revenues. He faced an ethical dilemma. He could resign and look for a new job, or he could illegitimately record nonexistent sales. He now understood why the former chief financial officer had resigned so abruptly. He wished that he could talk to her, but she was traveling in Australia and could not be contacted. The board of directors would be no help because they would take the president’s side in a dispute.
After considering his personal circumstances, Charles decided to record the illegitimate sales as the president had instructed. Charles knew that what he did was wrong. He believed that if the fraud was discovered, Holmes, not he, would be in trouble. After all, Charles rationalized, he was just following orders.
Required
- a. Can you justify what Charles did?
- b. What could Charles have done to avoid the ethical dilemma that he faced? Assume that the company president would have made it impossible for Charles to work in Atlanta in a comparable job.
- c. What if the Securities and Exchange Commission discovered this fraud? Would Charles’s boss get in trouble? Would Charles?
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Chapter 1 Solutions
FUNDAME.OF COST ACCT. W/CONNECT
- a) Define research methodology in the context of accounting theory and discuss the importance of selecting appropriate research methodology. Evaluate the strengths and limitations of quantitative and qualitative approaches in accounting research. b) Assess the role of modern accounting theories in guiding research in accounting. Discuss how contemporary theories, such as stakeholder theory, legitimacy theory, and behavioral accounting theory, shape research questions, hypotheses formulation, and empirical analysis. Question 4 Critically analyse the role of financial reporting in investment decision-making, emphasizing the qualitative characteristics that enhance the usefulness of financial statements. Discuss how financial reporting influences both investor confidence and regulatory decisions, using relevant examples.arrow_forwardFastarrow_forwardCODE 14 On August 1, 2010, Cheryl Newsome established Titus Realty, which completed the following transactions during the month: a. Cheryl Newsome transferred cash from a personal bank account to an account to be used for the business in exchange for capital stock, $25,000. b. Paid rent on office and equipment for the month, $2,750. c. Purchased supplies on account, $950. d. Paid creditor on account, $400. c. Earned sales commissions, receiving cash, $18,100. f. Paid automobile expenses (including rental charge) for month, $1,000, and miscel- laneous expenses, $600. g. Paid office salaries, $2,150. h. Determined that the cost of supplies used was $575. i. Paid dividends, $2,000. REQUIREMENTS: 1. Determine increase - decrease of each account and new balance 2. Prepare 3 F.S: Income statement; Retained Earnings Statement; Balance Sheet Scanned with CamScannerarrow_forward
- Assume that TDW Corporation (calendar-year-end) has 2024 taxable income of $952,000 for purposes of computing the §179 expense. The company acquired the following assets during 2024: (Use MACRS Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, and Table 5.) Asset Machinery Computer equipment Furniture Total Placed in Service September 12 February 10 April 2 Basis $ 2,270,250 263,325 880,425 $ 3,414,000 b. What is the maximum total depreciation, including §179 expense, that TDW may deduct in 2024 on the assets it placed in service in 2024, assuming no bonus depreciation? Note: Round your intermediate calculations and final answer to the nearest whole dollar amount. Maximum total depreciation deduction (including §179 expense)arrow_forwardEvergreen Corporation (calendar-year-end) acquired the following assets during the current year: (Use MACRS Table 1 and Table 2.) Date Placed in Asset Machinery Service October 25 Original Basis $ 120,000 Computer equipment February 3 47,500 Used delivery truck* August 17 Furniture April 22 60,500 212,500 The delivery truck is not a luxury automobile. Note: Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to the nearest whole dollar amount. b. What is the allowable depreciation on Evergreen's property in the current year if Evergreen does not elect out of bonus depreciation and elects out of §179 expense?arrow_forwardLina purchased a new car for use in her business during 2024. The auto was the only business asset she purchased during the year, and her business was extremely profitable. Calculate her maximum depreciation deductions (including §179 expense unless stated otherwise) for the automobile in 2024 and 2025 (Lina doesn't want to take bonus depreciation for 2024) in the following alternative scenarios (assuming half-year convention for all): (Use MACRS Table 1, Table 2, and Exhibit 10-10.) a. The vehicle cost $40,000, and business use is 100 percent (ignore §179 expense). Year Depreciation deduction 2024 2025arrow_forward
Accounting Information SystemsAccountingISBN:9781337619202Author:Hall, James A.Publisher:Cengage Learning,
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...AccountingISBN:9781305970663Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. MowenPublisher:Cengage Learning