Sub part (a):
The possible combination of consumption of two goods.
Sub part (a):
Explanation of Solution
The consumption bundle of two goods can be calculated by using the following formula.
Substitute the respective values in equation (1) to calculate the number of peanut bags purchased while consuming 0 units of candy bars.
When the person consumes 0 quantities of candy bars, then he can purchase 10 units of peanut bags.
Table -1 shows the possible quantity of candy bars and peanut bags with the given level of income that is obtained by using equation (1).
Table -1
Goods/Combination | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
Candy bars | 0 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 20 |
Bags of peanuts | 10 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 |
Concept introduction:
Budget constraint: Budget constraints define the possible bundles of services and commodities that are purchased at a given price level with the entire income.
Sub part b:
The possible combination of consumption of two goods.
Sub part b:
Explanation of Solution
The diagram below shows the possible combination of two goods that can be purchased with the limited income. It is drawn based on the values given in the Table -1.
In Figure 1, the horizontal axis measures the quantity of candy bars and the vertical axis measures the quantity of peanut bags. The downward slope indicates the budget line.
The slope can be calculated as follows.
Thus, the slope of this budget line is -0.5.
Opportunity cost (OP) of obtaining one more candy bar can be calculated as follows.
In the calculation of opportunity cost, the sign can be ignored. Thus, the opportunity cost of getting one more candy bar is 0.5.
The opportunity cost (OP) of obtaining one more peanut bag can be calculated as follows.
In the calculation of opportunity cost, the sign can be ignored. The opportunity cost of getting one more candy bar is 2. The opportunity costs are constant over the possible combination of bundles since the slope of the budget line remains the same over different points in the budget line.
Concept introduction:
Budget constraint: Budget constraints define the possible bundles of services and commodities that are purchased at a given price level with the entire income.
Opportunity cost: Opportunity cost refers to the benefits given up in the process of obtaining some other benefit.
Sub part (c):
The possible combination of consumption of two goods.
Sub part (c):
Explanation of Solution
The budget line shows only the possible combination of goods and services that can be purchased simultaneously within the given income level. Thus, it does not determine the optimum quantity of two goods.
Concept introduction:
Budget constraint: Budget constraints define the possible bundles of services and commodities that are purchased at a given price level with the entire income.
Opportunity cost: Opportunity cost refers to the benefits given up in the process of obtaining some other benefit.
Sub part (d):
The possible combination of consumption of two goods.
Sub part (d):
Explanation of Solution
Table -2 shows the possible quantity of candy bars and peanut bags with the increased level of income that is obtained by using equation (1).
Table -2
Goods/ Combination | 1 | 2 |
Candy bars | 0 | 40 |
Bags of peanuts | 20 | 0 |
The diagram below shows the possible combination of two goods that can be purchased with a limited income. It is drawn based on the values given in Table -2.
In Figure 2, the horizontal axis measures the quantity of the candy bar and the vertical axis measures the peanut bags. The downward slope (a) indicates the budget line with a $15 income, and the downward slope (b) indicates the budget line with a $30 income. Increasing the level of the income shifts the budget line to the right side.
Concept introduction:
Budget constraint: Budget constraints define the possible bundles of services and commodities that are purchased at a given price level with the entire income.
Opportunity cost: Opportunity cost refers to the benefits given up in the process of obtaining some other benefit.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 1 Solutions
Economics (Irwin Economics)
- If the price of an apple is $.50, the marginal utility per dollar spent for the fifth apple is Number of Apples Total Utility 130 180 220 A C E 2 3 4 LO 5 Noi 6 7 40 20 60 250 270 280 morfw escleris con B D 100 30 Larrow_forwardOnly typed answer and please don't use chatgptarrow_forward3arrow_forward
- 30arrow_forwardSuppose Duncan budgets $20 a week for entertainment. He can either go bowling for $4 a game, or play mini golf for $6 a game. Duncan maximizes his total utility by bowling twice and playing two games of mini golf. If the marginal utility from his second game of mini golf equals 12, what is the marginal utility per dollar from his second game of bowling? O 2 4-arrow_forwardO O O A. 33 B. 56 C. 29 O D. 35 Units 1 2 E. 59 345W N 6 7 Marginal Utility 10 0053 O 8 Toffee (bars) 1 Total Utility 10 18 23 26 27 27 27 Refer to the table above. If this consumer purchases 3 toffee bars and 5 bags of cashews per week, his/her total utility will be Cashews (bags) Marginal Utility 12 10 7 5 2 1 0 Total Utility 12 22 29 34 36 37 27arrow_forward
- 7arrow_forward= Suppose that consumer has the following utility function: U(X,Y) = 2XY+20X. Suppose also that Px 10, Py = 20 and I = 80. What would be the optimal consumption of X and Y at the equilibrium, respectively? O O O 8,0 6, 1 0,4 4, 2arrow_forward0 2 O 4 6 08 D Scones 10 1 2 3 4 5 Total Utility 10 18 24 Refer to Table 6.3, which shows the total utility and marginal utility derived from the consumption of scones. The first column of the table represents the number of scones a consumer consumes in a day. The second column of the table presents the total utility derived from that consumption, and the third column shows the marginal utility of each additional scone. The total utility derived from the consumption of one scone is units. 28 30 Marginal Utility 6 2arrow_forward
- What is this answer?arrow_forwardSuppose that the following Cobb-Douglas utility function is given U(X,Y) = X³y/2, Which of the following is correct? O Law of diminishing Marginal Utility holds for good Y but not for good X while Law of Diminishing Marginal Rate of Substitution holds. Law of diminishing Marginal Utility holds for good X but not for good Y while Law of Diminishing Marginal Rate of Substitution holds. Law of diminishing Marginal Utility holds for good Y but not for good X while Law of Diminishing Marginal Rate of Substitution fails to hold. Law of diminishing Marginal Utility holds for both goods and Law of Diminishing Marginal Rate of Substitution holds as wellarrow_forwardOnly typed answerarrow_forward
- Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStax