To think critically about : Whether the compensation to the top managers is higher. Introduction: The managers will often have an important economic incentive to maximize the value of shares. Commonly, the first incentive is that the managerial compensation is often tied to the financial performance in common to offer share value. The second incentive the managers relate to the prospects of the job is to promote the top performers in the firm. Statement: Person MF, a Chief Executive Officer in Company MG earned $89 million in the year 2014.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 1, Problem 1.14CTCR

Summary Introduction

To think critically about: Whether the compensation to the top managers is higher.

Introduction:

The managers will often have an important economic incentive to maximize the value of shares. Commonly, the first incentive is that the managerial compensation is often tied to the financial performance in common to offer share value.

The second incentive the managers relate to the prospects of the job is to promote the top performers in the firm.

Statement:

Person MF, a Chief Executive Officer in Company MG earned $89 million in the year 2014.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

1.Why did the strategic plans adopted by companies like Level 3, Global Crossing, and 360 Networks fail? 2.The managers who ran these companies were smart, successful individuals, as were many of the investors who put money into these businesses. How could so many smart people have been so wrong? 3.What specific decision-making biases do you think were at work in this industry during the late 1990s and early 2000s? 4.What could the managers running these companies have done differently that might have led to a different outcome? 5.Do you think the firm is living up to its mission, vision, values, and goals? What evidence do you have to support your conclusion? 6.Can you find any evidence that managers at the organization might have made any significant strategic errors over the last decade? If they have, what role did poor planning, a lack of planning, or decision-making traps play in these errors?

“Too big to fail” was a common buzz phrase during the Great Recession. The idea behind it is that certain businesses are so important to an economy that disastrous consequences would result if they were allowed to fail and so government intervention is necessary. How is the concept of moral hazard relevant here?

Firms often involve themselves in projects that do not result directly in profits. For example, Microsoft corporation donated $10 million to Stanford University hospitals and another $40 million to the African aid organization (Product) RED, a charity fighting against AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria. Do these projects contradict the goal of maximization of shareholder wealth? Why or why not? What is the agency problem, and how might it impact the goal of maximization of shareholder wealth? What is corporate governance? What role does a corporation’s board of directors play in corporate governance? The manager of Golden Ray Corporation receives a bonus if company profits exceed $1,000,000 this year. During the final week of the year, the manager changes an accounting policy that will increase reported profits from $950,000 to $1,025,000, triggering his bonus. The change in profits of $75,000 will reverse itself in the next year, and the accounting change has no impact on…