You play the following bargaining game. Player A moves first and makes Player B an offer for the division of $1000. (For example, Player A could suggest that she take $600 and Player B take $400.) Player B can accept or reject the offer. If he rejects it, the amount of money available drops to $800, and he then make an offer for the division of this amount. If Player A rejects this offer, the amount of money drops to $700 and Player A makes an offer for its division. If Player B rejects this offer, the amount of money drops to $0 and player A keeps the $700. Both players are rational, fully informed, and want to maximize their payoffs. Which player will do best in this game? Assume that monetary divisions must take the form of dollars (rather than cents or smaller denominations) and, in each round, a player will offer at least $1. The player that will do best in this game is because when following his optimal strategy he should receive a payoff of $. (Enter a numeric response using an integer.)

You play the following bargaining game. Player A moves first and makes Player B an offer for the division of $1000. (For example, Player A could suggest that she take $600 and Player B take $400.) Player B can accept or reject the offer. If he rejects it, the amount of money available drops to $800, and he then make an offer for the division of this amount. If Player A rejects this offer, the amount of money drops to $700 and Player A makes an offer for its division. If Player B rejects this offer, the amount of money drops to $0 and player A keeps the $700. Both players are rational, fully informed, and want to maximize their payoffs. Which player will do best in this game? Assume that monetary divisions must take the form of dollars (rather than cents or smaller denominations) and, in each round, a player will offer at least $1. The player that will do best in this game is because when following his optimal strategy he should receive a payoff of $. (Enter a numeric response using an integer.)

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider a sequential-move version of a rock-paper-scissor game. Players sequentially form one of three shapes with an outstretched hand. These shapes are "rock", "paper", and "scissors". A player playing rock will beat another player playing chosen scissors, but will lose to one playing paper; a play of paper will lose to a play of scissors. If both players choose the same shape, the game is tied. Suppose the winner receives a payoff of 1 and the loser receives the payoff of -1. Both players receive zero payoff under a tie. Suppose Player 1 moves first and Player 2 moves afterwards. In this game, what is the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium payoff of Player 1? 1 00 0-1
An object is sold in a first-price auction – thus, the highest bidder wins the object and price is equal to the highest bid. There are two bidders, an "Odd" bidder (player 1) and an "Even" bidder (player 2). The odd bidder must bid an odd integer between 1 and 9, while the Even bidder must bid an even integer between 2 and 10. (So the strategy sets are {1,3, ...,9} and {2,4, ..., 10}.) The value of the object to the Odd bidder is 8, and value of the object to the Even bidder is 7. The payoff to the winner is the value of the object minus the price, and the payoff to the loser is 0. (a) Write the game in its strategic form. (b) Find all Nash equilibria.
Return to the game between Monica and Nancy in Exercise U10 in Chapter 5. Assume that Monica and Nancy choose their effort levels sequentially instead of simultaneously. Monica commits to her choice of effort level first. On observing this decision, Nancy commits to her own effort level. What is the subgame - perfect equilibrium of the game where the joint profits are 5m + 4n+ mn, the costs of their efforts to Monica and Nancy are m2 and n2, respectively, and Monica commits to an effort level first? Compare the payoffs to Monica and Nancy with those found in Exercise U10 in Chapter 5. Does this game have a first-mover or second - mover advantage? Using the same joint profit function as in part (a), find the subgame - perfect equilibrium for the game where Nancy must commit first to an effort level. U10. Return to the game between Monica and Nancy in Exercise U10 in Chapter 5. Assume that Monica and Nancy choose their effort levels sequentially instead of simultaneously. Monica commits…
a. b. Each firm has four alternative strategies, and a certain profit/payoff is associated with each strategy. The numbers in the payoff matrix denote firm A's profit (in thousands of dollars). The total amount of profit that can be earned by the two firms together is $20000. (This is called a "constant sum game.") Firm B's profit is therefore $20000 minus firm A's profit. What strategies will the two firms select? Is the game strictly determined? If so, how much does each firm gain? B's strategies A's strategies ↓ Increase Advertising Decrease Price Increase Price Alter Product Increase Advertising 0 11 8 11 Decrease Price 8 10 6 2 Increase Price 7 12 15 Alter Product 4 15 3 12 Suppose now that due to a change in consumer preferences, firm A's "Increase Price" strategy pays off better than before when firm B elects to "Decrease Price," that is, the payoff rises from 6 to 14. What strategies will the two firms now select? Is the game strictly determined? If so, how much does each firm…
Player 1 can stay at home or fly to New York, in which case Player 2 can meet Player 1, who can then buy a drink for Player 2. See the game below. Which of the following completely describes a possible strategy for Player 1? 1 Fly to New York Stay home Stay home Stay home and Don't buy drink Fly to New York and Meet Stay home or Fly to New York 2 Meet Don't meet 0,0 1 Buy drink Don't buy drink -2,0 1,2 -1, -1
Question 2 Suppose there are two players, an entrant and an incumbent firm playing the following game: the entrant decides whether to stay out or enter. The incumbent decides whether to innovate or not. If the entrant stays out, the entrant firm gets a payoff of 0 whereas the incumbent firm gets a payoff od 1500, independent of the action of the incumbent firm. If the entrant enters and the incumbent doesn't innovate, the entrant gets 1200 whereas the incumbent gets 500. If the entrant enters and the incumbent innovates, the entrant and the incumbent get a payoff of 1000 each. a) Draw the normal form of the game and solve for the Nash equilibrium/equilibria. b) Suppose the game is dynamic: first the entrant decides whether to enter or stay out. If the entrant enters, the incumbent decides whether to innovate or not. If the entrant stays out, the incumbent doesn't get to play. Draw the extensive form of the fame, mark the subgames on paper and solve for the subgame-perfect Nash…
In 'the dictator' game, one player (the dictator) chooses how to divide a pot of $10 between herself and another player (the recipient). The recipient does not have an opportunity to reject the proposed distribution. As such, if the dictator only cares about how much money she makes, she should keep all $10 for herself and give the recipient nothing. However, when economists conduct experiments with the dictator game, they find that dictators often offer strictly positive amounts to the recipients. Are dictators behaving irrationally in these experiments? Whether you think they are or not, your response should try to provide an explanation for the behavior.
Table 3. This table shows a game played between two firms, Firm A and Firm B. In this game each firm must decide how much output (Q) to produce: 5 units or 6 units. The profit for each firm is given in the table as (Profit for Firm A. Profit for Firm B). Firm A Q=5 Q=6 Firm B Q=5 (24, 24) (30, 10) Q=6 (10,30) (19, 19) Refer to Table 3. The dominant strategy For Firm A is to produce Select one: O a. 5 units and the dominant strategy for Firm B is to produce 5 units. b. 5 units and the dominant strategy for Firm B is to produce 6 units. c. 6 units and the dominant strategy for Firm B is to produce 5 units. d. 6 units and the dominant strategy for Firm B is to produce 6 units.
Prove that in the variation on the centipede game given in figure 14.5(b) the unique sequential equilibrium described is, in fact, the unique Nash equilibrium. (Hint: Take some presumed Nash equilibrium and suppose information set 2n+ 1 [for player 2] is the first unreached information set. Derive an immediate contradiction. Then suppose that node (2n) t is the first unreached information set and derive a contradiction that is one degree removed from immediate.)
Consider the following three-stage duopoly game. There are two firms in the market: Firm 1 and Firm 2. In the first stage, a first-price auction is conducted to determine the order of moves. The firm with the highest bid (first mover) pays a cost equivalent to its bid and chooses its action in the second stage. After observing this action, the other firm (second mover) chooses its action in the third stage. When there is a tie in the first stage (both firms submit the same bid), a coin is tossed to determine the winner, and only the winner pays its bid. Each firm has the following three possible actions: small (expansion), medium (expansion) and large (expansion), and the payoffs they obtain in the market (not the final payoffs yet) are shown below: The second mover Small Medium Large 16, 12 Medium 18, 8 19, 7 13, 10 14, 11 Small 9, 9 10, 13 12, 10 The first mover Large 14, 12 The final payoff is equivalent to the payoff obtained in the market minus the cost (if any) paid in auction.…
The US and Canada have overfished North Atlantic cod stocks nearly to the point of extinction. Both countries wish to preserve the cod industry (and hence the cod stocks), so the two countries sign an agreement to limit fish hauls. Each country has two possible strategies: comply with the agreement (limit fishing) or renege on the agreement (overfish). Each country’s payoffs for different strategy combinations are given in the matrix below. The numbers in the cells represent utilities, and the payoff ordering is (US, Canada). QUESTIONS: 1.If this is a one-shot game (i.e., it is played once), do the players have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? Briefly explain your answer. 2.What is the equilibrium of this game? Is it Pareto-optimal? How do you know?
Consider the following two person game. Player 1 begins the game by choosing A or B. If Player 1 chooses A the game ends and Player 1 receives $100 and Player 2 receives $100. If Player 1 chooses B then Player 2 must choose C or D. If Player 2 chooses C then Player 1 receives $150 and Player 2 receives $250. If Player 2 chooses D then Player 1 receives $0 and Player 2 receives $400. Draw the complete game tree for this situation. Be sure to accurately label the tree and include the payoffs. Using backwards induction (look forward and reason backwards) determine the rational outcome to this game. Given how experimental subjects have behaved in the Ultimatum game, provide a behavioral explanation for why an “average” Player 1 and 2 might deviate from the rational prediction.