You have been asked to evaluate whether a project to preserve an area of forest should go ahead or whether the land should be converted to agriculture. The net benefits of ecosystem goods and services have been valued over the next four years at R6000, R10 000, R14 000 and R22 000 respectively. The immediate cost of preserving the forest is R23 500. Assume that MWTP = 90 - 3Q and MC = 10 + 2Q. The discount rate is 7%.

You have been asked to evaluate whether a project to preserve an area of forest should go ahead or whether the land should be converted to agriculture. The net benefits of ecosystem goods and services have been valued over the next four years at R6000, R10 000, R14 000 and R22 000 respectively. The immediate cost of preserving the forest is R23 500. Assume that MWTP = 90 - 3Q and MC = 10 + 2Q. The discount rate is 7%.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

After 10 years, the public transportation remain unimproved. The modal split will also remain unchanged with 70% of person-trips utilize Public Transportation during peak period. After 10 years, the person-trip demand will increase from 450 to 675. If the overall capacity of the Public Transportation during peak period can carry up to 450 person-trips, the demand/ PT supply capacity ratio is -_ places) (answer shall be in 2 demical
The cost of grading and spreading gravel on a curvy rural road is expected to be $300,000. The road will have to be maintained at a cost of $24,000 per year. Even though the new road is not very smooth, it allows access to an area that previously could only be reached with off-road vehicles. The improved accessibility has led to a 198 % increase in the property values along the road. If the previous market value of the property was $900,000, calculate the conventional B/C ratio using an interest rate of 6% per year and a 20-year study period. The conventional B/C ratio is
There exists 3000 tons of a non-renewable resource (q). Demand is given by P=800−0.25q where P is price. Marginal cost is constant and equal to 200. Assume there are two choices: either to mine the resource today (period 0) or in the next period (period 1). Assume a discount rate of 3%.For each question state: 1.How much will be mined in period 0 and 1, respectively? 2.What is the increase in price in percent between the periods?
Justify a positive discount rate in the n-period dynamic efficiency model.
Suppose there is a depletable resource that has a stock-size of 28. The static Marginal Net Benefit in each period is 60 - 1.8q. The discount rate is 20% (r=0.2). The dynamic, efficient solution is for units to be extracted in period 1 and units to be extracted in period 2.
Techware Incorporated is considering the introduction of two new software products to the market. The company has four options regarding these products: introduce neither product, introduce product 1 only, introduce product 2 only, or introduce both products. Research and development costs for products 1 and 2 are $180,000 and $150,000, respectively. Note that the first option entails no costs because research and development efforts have not yet begun. The success of these software products depends on the national economy in the coming year. The company's revenues, depending on its decision and the state of the economy, are given in the file P09_33.xlsx. The probabilities of a strong, fair, or weak economy in the coming year are assessed to be 0.10, 0.60, and 0.30, respectively. a. Use PrecisionTree to identify the strategy that maximizes Techware's expected net revenue. Techware's optimal decision is to introduce Select: both products - product 1 only - product 2 only - neither…
Q6
The goal of the local Agenda 21 Program was to help communities generate activities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. According to its website, Environment Canada planned to sponsor individual and community actions to promote sustainable development and greener societies for $6 million in 1997, and $5.2 million in 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001. a) Display each item along an appropriate timeline. b) Find the formula and compute the present value of the Agenda 21 Program in 2023 dollars (using a 5% annual discount rate), c) Suppose that this program is the only action Canada undertakes in this domain. If some economists at Environment Canada claimed that the Action 21 Program is worth undertaking, because the amount you calculated in b) is equivalent to the change in consumer surplus (in the relevant markets, say for medical care, etc.) due to living in a greener environment, would you agree or disagree with these economists? Explain.
Suppose a firm is investing in a pollution control technology to meet a regulation in three years that can reduce its emissions for any given level of output. The technology costs $40,000 to install now, but will cost only $10,000 three years later due to expected innovations. If the firm does not comply, it will have to pay fines with the amount of $5000 in the next year, $10,000 in two years, and $15,000 in three years. With an interest rate of 3%, should the firm install this technology now or later?
Three firms in a single industry are the only source, in a given airshed, of emissions of a uniformly mixed pollutant, say, CO₂. Their emissions levels are currently e₁ = 300, e2 = 200, and e3 100, where the subscript denotes firms. The environmental regulator has decided that emissions should be reduced by half, to E=300. The firms' abatement cost functions are given by C₁ (a₁) = 0.1a₁, C₂(a₂) = 0.2a2, and C3 (a3) = 0.3a²3 respectively. (It is assumed that these functions describe the firms' entire cost structure, including the cost of producing the optimal level of output given e;.) Enforcement costs are zero and there is no uncertainty. Suppose the regulator decide to employ a Command-and-Control scheme, requiring that each firm reduce its emissions in proportion to ej. Calculate the aggregate cost of abatement and each firm's emissions level.
The discount rate when the net present value of a project is zero is called the rate of return marginal rate of transformation return on equity internal rate of return
Assume the relationship between the growth of a fish population and the population size can be represented as g= 8S – 0.2S2, where g is the growth in tons and S is the size of the population (in thousands of tons) a. Given a price of $100 a ton of fish, what is the marginal benefit of smaller population sizes? b. Estimate the population size that is compatible with the maximum sustainable yield. What would be the size of the annual catch if the population were to be sustained at this level? c. If the marginal cost of additional catches (represented in terms of the population size) is MC= 3(120-S), what is the population size that is compatible with the efficient sustainable yield? d. Is there a difference between the maximum sustainable yield you calculated in part (b) and the efficient sustainable yield in part (c)? Why or why not? Explain briefly (in 1 paragraph or less)