x2, x+2 If (a) f(x) = x² and (b) f(x)= 0, prove that lim f(x) = 4. x2 x = 2 (a) We must show that, given any e > 0, we can find 8 > 0 (depending on e in general) such that |x - 4|

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
icon
Related questions
Question
3.10) my professor says I have to explain the steps in the solved problems in the picture. Not just copy eveything down from the text.
Limits
(x², x+2
If (a) f(x) = x² and (b) f(x)=
(0,
prove that lim f(x) = 4.
x→2
3.10.
x = 2
(a) We must show that, given any e > 0, we can find 8 > 0 (depending on e in general) such that |x - 4|<e
when 0 < |x – 2| < 8.
Choose 8 < 1 so that 0< |x- 2| <1 or 1<x<3, x + 2. Then |x² – 4| = |(x– 2)(x + 2)| = |x– 2|
|x + 2| < 8]x+2] <58.
Take 8 as 1 or e/5, whichever is smaller. Then we have |x² – 4| < e whenever 0< |x– 2| < 8, and the
required result is proved.
It is of interest to consider some numerical values. If, for example, we wish to make |x – 4| <.05,
we can choose d = €/5 = .05/5 = .01. To see that this is actually the case, note that if 0 < |x – 2| < .01,
then 1.99 <x< 2.01 (x + 2), and so 3.9601 <x² < 4.0401, – .0399 <x² – 4< .0401, and certainly |x –- |
<.05 (x + 4). The fact that these inequalities also happen to hold at x = 2 is merely coincidental.
If we wish to make |x2 – 4| < 6, we can choose 8 = 1, and this will be satisfied.
(b) There is no difference between the proof for this case and the proof in (a), since in both cases we exclude
x= 2.
Transcribed Image Text:Limits (x², x+2 If (a) f(x) = x² and (b) f(x)= (0, prove that lim f(x) = 4. x→2 3.10. x = 2 (a) We must show that, given any e > 0, we can find 8 > 0 (depending on e in general) such that |x - 4|<e when 0 < |x – 2| < 8. Choose 8 < 1 so that 0< |x- 2| <1 or 1<x<3, x + 2. Then |x² – 4| = |(x– 2)(x + 2)| = |x– 2| |x + 2| < 8]x+2] <58. Take 8 as 1 or e/5, whichever is smaller. Then we have |x² – 4| < e whenever 0< |x– 2| < 8, and the required result is proved. It is of interest to consider some numerical values. If, for example, we wish to make |x – 4| <.05, we can choose d = €/5 = .05/5 = .01. To see that this is actually the case, note that if 0 < |x – 2| < .01, then 1.99 <x< 2.01 (x + 2), and so 3.9601 <x² < 4.0401, – .0399 <x² – 4< .0401, and certainly |x –- | <.05 (x + 4). The fact that these inequalities also happen to hold at x = 2 is merely coincidental. If we wish to make |x2 – 4| < 6, we can choose 8 = 1, and this will be satisfied. (b) There is no difference between the proof for this case and the proof in (a), since in both cases we exclude x= 2.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Linear Equations
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, advanced-math and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Basic Technical Mathematics
Basic Technical Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134437705
Author:
Washington
Publisher:
PEARSON
Topology
Topology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134689517
Author:
Munkres, James R.
Publisher:
Pearson,