Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Social Science
History
Why might Procopius's history of Justinian's reign (The Secret History) be considered a problematic source? Procopius disliked Justinian's wife and so may have been biased in his depiction of her. ● All of the above Procopius held extensive lands that were lost during Justinian's invasion of North Africa. Procopius wrote many years after the events that he described and did not have firsthand knowledge of what he described.

Why might Procopius's history of Justinian's reign (The Secret History) be considered a problematic source? Procopius disliked Justinian's wife and so may have been biased in his depiction of her. ● All of the above Procopius held extensive lands that were lost during Justinian's invasion of North Africa. Procopius wrote many years after the events that he described and did not have firsthand knowledge of what he described.

icon
Related questions
Question
**Why might Procopius's history of Justinian's reign (The Secret History) be considered a problematic source?** - ◯ Procopius disliked Justinian's wife and so may have been biased in his depiction of her. - ● All of the above - ◯ Procopius held extensive lands that were lost during Justinian's invasion of North Africa. - ◯ Procopius wrote many years after the events that he described and did not have firsthand knowledge of what he described. --- Explanation: This question explores potential reasons why the historical account "The Secret History" by Procopius might be considered problematic. The possible reasons provided include: 1. Bias due to personal dislike of Justinian’s wife 2. Cumulative bias as the answer 'All of the above' suggests that multiple factors may have contributed to the problem 3. Personal loss of land which may have influenced Procopius’s perspective 4. Lack of firsthand knowledge due to the time gap between the events and when Procopius wrote about them. The correct answer chosen here is "All of the above," indicating that all the mentioned reasons might collectively contribute to the potential biases and problematic nature of this historical source.
Transcribed Image Text:**Why might Procopius's history of Justinian's reign (The Secret History) be considered a problematic source?** - ◯ Procopius disliked Justinian's wife and so may have been biased in his depiction of her. - ● All of the above - ◯ Procopius held extensive lands that were lost during Justinian's invasion of North Africa. - ◯ Procopius wrote many years after the events that he described and did not have firsthand knowledge of what he described. --- Explanation: This question explores potential reasons why the historical account "The Secret History" by Procopius might be considered problematic. The possible reasons provided include: 1. Bias due to personal dislike of Justinian’s wife 2. Cumulative bias as the answer 'All of the above' suggests that multiple factors may have contributed to the problem 3. Personal loss of land which may have influenced Procopius’s perspective 4. Lack of firsthand knowledge due to the time gap between the events and when Procopius wrote about them. The correct answer chosen here is "All of the above," indicating that all the mentioned reasons might collectively contribute to the potential biases and problematic nature of this historical source.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer