why educated people began to doubt the reality of witchcraft and/or the danger it posed. Was the development of science and a scientific epistemology for making sense of the world the primary factor here, or do other kinds of arguments not necessarily based in science seem to have predominated? When did science become central to arguments against witchcraft? Did magic have to become superstition, and scientific epistemology supersede that of magic, for witch hunts to end, or do you think that even within the pre-modern magical worldview there existed solid grounds to dismiss witchcraft?
why educated people began to doubt the reality of witchcraft and/or the danger it posed. Was the development of science and a scientific epistemology for making sense of the world the primary factor here, or do other kinds of arguments not necessarily based in science seem to have predominated? When did science become central to arguments against witchcraft? Did magic have to become superstition, and scientific epistemology supersede that of magic, for witch hunts to end, or do you think that even within the pre-modern magical worldview there existed solid grounds to dismiss witchcraft?
Related questions
Question
why educated people began to doubt the reality of witchcraft and/or the danger it posed. Was the development of science and a scientific epistemology for making sense of the world the primary factor here, or do other kinds of arguments not necessarily based in science seem to have predominated? When did science become central to arguments against witchcraft? Did magic have to become superstition, and scientific epistemology supersede that of magic, for witch hunts to end, or do you think that even within the pre-modern magical worldview there existed solid grounds to dismiss witchcraft?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
