Which of the following was a direct outcome of the Three-Fifths Compromise? A The number of senators increased in slaveholding states. Slavery quickly declined, especially in larger cities in the South. Slaveholding states were able to count slaves to determine their number of senators. The number of representatives in the House of Representatives from slaveholding states increased.
Which of the following was a direct outcome of the Three-Fifths Compromise? A The number of senators increased in slaveholding states. Slavery quickly declined, especially in larger cities in the South. Slaveholding states were able to count slaves to determine their number of senators. The number of representatives in the House of Representatives from slaveholding states increased.
Related questions
Question

Transcribed Image Text:A Lesson 2, Upload Cash Flow Spr x
A Question 3 | APUSGovt.LAHS.Qo: x
C介
testing.illuminateed.com/assessment/604775474dfa0978b46fe/6054c79ccd2a2e97578b5873/3?rldbqn=1
O student.northstaracademy.org bookmarks
G Image result for arc.
E on dermand essay h.
Sonia Sotomayor -
-2y 2 +2x 2 =-3x.
TED Samy Nour
PUKGOAH
Question 3
Il Pause
Q Zoom
Q Review /
ABC
Question 3
Which of the following was a direct outcome of the Three-Fifths Compromise?
A
The number of senators increased in slaveholding states.
B
Slavery quickly declined, especially in larger cities in the South.
Slaveholding states were able to count slaves
determine their number of senators.
The number of representatives in the House of Representatives from slaveholding states increased.
©2021 Illuminate EducationTM, Inc.
Sig
DELL
火
Ce
$
&
4.
7
8.
e
r
t
y
f
#3.
Expert Solution

This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
