Why does Backman refer to the Bible not as a book, but a library? it is too long to be bound into a single volume one had to travel to a special location to read it it consists of many books written over a long time one had to have special permission to read it
Why does Backman refer to the Bible not as a book, but a library? it is too long to be bound into a single volume one had to travel to a special location to read it it consists of many books written over a long time one had to have special permission to read it
Related questions
Question
![Why does Backman refer to the Bible not as a book, but a library?
it is too long to be bound into a single volume
O one had to travel to a special location to read it
it consists of many books written over a long time
one had to have special permission to read it](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2F233396bf-72f6-4e47-8d0d-be3130c6d58a%2Fe654338b-c035-442d-8076-d438c3437ac1%2Fq7yawbcp_processed.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:Why does Backman refer to the Bible not as a book, but a library?
it is too long to be bound into a single volume
O one had to travel to a special location to read it
it consists of many books written over a long time
one had to have special permission to read it
Expert Solution
![](/static/compass_v2/shared-icons/check-mark.png)
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
![Blurred answer](/static/compass_v2/solution-images/blurred-answer.jpg)