When the heights (in inches) and shoe lengths (also in inches) were measured for a large random sample of individuals, it was found that r = 0.89, and a regression equation was constructed in order to further explore the relationship between shoe length and height, with height being the response variable. From this information, what can we conclude? The correlation coefficient should have no units. The regression equation relating shoe length to height must have a slope equal to 0.89. The regression equation relating shoe length to height must have a positive intercept. Approximately 89% of the variability in height can be explained by the regression equation. Because the value of r is less than 1, we should characterize this relationship as being weak.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
When the heights (in inches) and shoe lengths (also in inches) were measured for a large random sample of
individuals, it was found that r = 0.89, and a regression equation was constructed in order to further explore
the relationship between shoe length and height, with height being the response variable. From this
information, what can we conclude?
The correlation coefficient should have no units.
The regression equation relating shoe length to height must have a slope equal to 0.89.
The regression equation relating shoe length to height must have a positive intercept.
O Approximately 89% of the variability in height can be explained by the regression equation.
Because the value of r is less than 1, we should characterize this relationship as being weak.
Transcribed Image Text:When the heights (in inches) and shoe lengths (also in inches) were measured for a large random sample of individuals, it was found that r = 0.89, and a regression equation was constructed in order to further explore the relationship between shoe length and height, with height being the response variable. From this information, what can we conclude? The correlation coefficient should have no units. The regression equation relating shoe length to height must have a slope equal to 0.89. The regression equation relating shoe length to height must have a positive intercept. O Approximately 89% of the variability in height can be explained by the regression equation. Because the value of r is less than 1, we should characterize this relationship as being weak.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman