What kind of game (according to outcome and sequence) is Crandall proposing to Putnam? 2. If Putnam agreed with Crandall’s proposal, how will this decision affect the buyers?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question

Questions:
1. What kind of game (according to outcome and sequence) is Crandall proposing to Putnam?
2. If Putnam agreed with Crandall’s proposal, how will this decision affect the buyers?

AN ILLEGAL PHONE CALL
Firms in oligopolies have a strong incentive to collude to reduce production, raise price, and
increase profit. The great 18th-century economist Adam Smith was well aware of this potential market
failure. In The Wealth of Nations he wrote. People of the same trade seldom meet together, but the
conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some diversion to raise prices.
To see a modem example of Smith's observation, consider the following excerpt of a phone
conversation between two airline executives in the early 1980s. The call was reported in The New
York Times on February 24, 1983. Robert Crandall was president of American Airlines, and Howard
Putnam was president of Braniff Airways.
CRANDALL: I think itť's dumb as hel. to sit here and compete with each other and neither one of us making
a dime.
PUTNAM: Do you have a suggestion for me?
CRANDALL: Yes, I have a suggestion for you. Raise your fares 20 percent. I'll raise mine the next morning.
PUTNAM: Robert, we-
CRANDALL: You'll make more money, and I will, too.
PUTNAM: We can't talk about pricing!
CRANDALL: Oh, Howard. We can talk about anything we want to talk about.
Putnam was right: The Sherman Antitrust Act of the US prohibits competing executives from even talking
about fixing prices. When Putnam gave a tape of this conversation to the Department of Justice, it filed
suit against Crandall.
Two (2) years later, Crandall and the Department of Justice reached a settlement in which Crandall
agreed to various restrictions on his business activities, including his contacts with officials at other
airlines. The Department of Justice said that the terms of settlement would "protect competition in the
airline industry, by preventing American and Crandall from any further attempts to monopolize passenger
airline service on any route through discussions with competitors about the prices of airline services".
Transcribed Image Text:AN ILLEGAL PHONE CALL Firms in oligopolies have a strong incentive to collude to reduce production, raise price, and increase profit. The great 18th-century economist Adam Smith was well aware of this potential market failure. In The Wealth of Nations he wrote. People of the same trade seldom meet together, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some diversion to raise prices. To see a modem example of Smith's observation, consider the following excerpt of a phone conversation between two airline executives in the early 1980s. The call was reported in The New York Times on February 24, 1983. Robert Crandall was president of American Airlines, and Howard Putnam was president of Braniff Airways. CRANDALL: I think itť's dumb as hel. to sit here and compete with each other and neither one of us making a dime. PUTNAM: Do you have a suggestion for me? CRANDALL: Yes, I have a suggestion for you. Raise your fares 20 percent. I'll raise mine the next morning. PUTNAM: Robert, we- CRANDALL: You'll make more money, and I will, too. PUTNAM: We can't talk about pricing! CRANDALL: Oh, Howard. We can talk about anything we want to talk about. Putnam was right: The Sherman Antitrust Act of the US prohibits competing executives from even talking about fixing prices. When Putnam gave a tape of this conversation to the Department of Justice, it filed suit against Crandall. Two (2) years later, Crandall and the Department of Justice reached a settlement in which Crandall agreed to various restrictions on his business activities, including his contacts with officials at other airlines. The Department of Justice said that the terms of settlement would "protect competition in the airline industry, by preventing American and Crandall from any further attempts to monopolize passenger airline service on any route through discussions with competitors about the prices of airline services".
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Payoff Matrix
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education