Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Social Science
History
What is the state's best course of action in regards to the federal government's mandate? The federal government passes an education mandate creating national common core standards. The state of Idaho must follow these standards, but lawmakers think that the standards should be more rigorous and align O The state can pass additional legislation to increase the educational standards. more closely to Idaho's educational needs. O The state can modify the educational standards set out by the federal government. O The state can ignore the educational standards that do not align with its curriculum. O The state can request permission from the federal government to create more educational standards.

What is the state's best course of action in regards to the federal government's mandate? The federal government passes an education mandate creating national common core standards. The state of Idaho must follow these standards, but lawmakers think that the standards should be more rigorous and align O The state can pass additional legislation to increase the educational standards. more closely to Idaho's educational needs. O The state can modify the educational standards set out by the federal government. O The state can ignore the educational standards that do not align with its curriculum. O The state can request permission from the federal government to create more educational standards.

icon
Related questions
Question
100%
--- **Understanding Federal Education Mandates and State Responses** **Scenario:** The federal government passes an education mandate creating national Common Core standards. The state of Idaho must follow these standards, but lawmakers think that the standards should be more rigorous and align more closely to Idaho's educational needs. **Question:** What is the state's best course of action in regards to the federal government’s mandate? **Options:** 1. The state can pass additional legislation to increase the educational standards. 2. The state can modify the educational standards set out by the federal government. 3. The state can ignore the educational standards that do not align with its curriculum. 4. The state can request permission from the federal government to create more educational standards. **Choices:** - To respond to the federal government’s mandate effectively, Idaho has several options. These include passing new legislation, modifying existing federal standards, ignoring certain standards, or seeking federal approval to implement additional standards. - Each option has its own implications. For instance, passing additional legislation could enhance Idaho's standards, but it requires state resources and legislative consensus. On the other hand, modifying or ignoring federal standards may conflict with federal guidelines, potentially impacting federal education funding. Seeking federal permission can be a balanced approach, ensuring compliance while addressing state-specific needs. --- In this transcription, the content is organized clearly to provide context, the question, and the possible responses for ease of understanding by students, educators, and other website users.
Transcribed Image Text:--- **Understanding Federal Education Mandates and State Responses** **Scenario:** The federal government passes an education mandate creating national Common Core standards. The state of Idaho must follow these standards, but lawmakers think that the standards should be more rigorous and align more closely to Idaho's educational needs. **Question:** What is the state's best course of action in regards to the federal government’s mandate? **Options:** 1. The state can pass additional legislation to increase the educational standards. 2. The state can modify the educational standards set out by the federal government. 3. The state can ignore the educational standards that do not align with its curriculum. 4. The state can request permission from the federal government to create more educational standards. **Choices:** - To respond to the federal government’s mandate effectively, Idaho has several options. These include passing new legislation, modifying existing federal standards, ignoring certain standards, or seeking federal approval to implement additional standards. - Each option has its own implications. For instance, passing additional legislation could enhance Idaho's standards, but it requires state resources and legislative consensus. On the other hand, modifying or ignoring federal standards may conflict with federal guidelines, potentially impacting federal education funding. Seeking federal permission can be a balanced approach, ensuring compliance while addressing state-specific needs. --- In this transcription, the content is organized clearly to provide context, the question, and the possible responses for ease of understanding by students, educators, and other website users.
### Powers and Weaknesses of Congress under the Articles of Confederation The following table outlines the powers and associated weaknesses of the Congress under the Articles of Confederation: | Powers of Congress under the Articles of Confederation | Weaknesses of Congress under the Articles of Confederation | |-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | A. It had the responsibility of establishing a judiciary. | It could not settle disputes between the states. | | B. It could draft soldiers into the armed forces. | It could not control the armed forces. | | C. It had sole responsibility for making laws for the nation. | It had no way of enforcing the laws it created. | | D. It could directly tax citizens for revenue. | It had no ability to create a national currency. | ### Question Which row in the chart accurately compares the powers and weaknesses of Congress under the Articles of Confederation? Options: - A - B - C - D --- In examining this chart, you will learn about the specific powers granted to the Congress under the Articles of Confederation and simultaneously understand the notable weaknesses that hindered effective governance. This insight can prompt critical discussions about the challenges faced by the early United States government and the eventual shift to the U.S. Constitution.
Transcribed Image Text:### Powers and Weaknesses of Congress under the Articles of Confederation The following table outlines the powers and associated weaknesses of the Congress under the Articles of Confederation: | Powers of Congress under the Articles of Confederation | Weaknesses of Congress under the Articles of Confederation | |-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | A. It had the responsibility of establishing a judiciary. | It could not settle disputes between the states. | | B. It could draft soldiers into the armed forces. | It could not control the armed forces. | | C. It had sole responsibility for making laws for the nation. | It had no way of enforcing the laws it created. | | D. It could directly tax citizens for revenue. | It had no ability to create a national currency. | ### Question Which row in the chart accurately compares the powers and weaknesses of Congress under the Articles of Confederation? Options: - A - B - C - D --- In examining this chart, you will learn about the specific powers granted to the Congress under the Articles of Confederation and simultaneously understand the notable weaknesses that hindered effective governance. This insight can prompt critical discussions about the challenges faced by the early United States government and the eventual shift to the U.S. Constitution.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer