Wendell and Dominick both enjoy oranges, which come in two varieties: Good and Excellent! If we denote good oranges with the variable G and excellent oranges with the variable E, then both Wendell and Dominick would have preferences represented by: U = G*E. Wendell lives in Florida, where good oranges cost $0.7, and excellent oranges cost $2.44. Dominick lives in New York where both kinds of oranges cost $1.09 more than they do in Florida. Both Wendell and Dominick set aside $24 in their budget to buy oranges. Determine the optimal consumption bundles for Wendell and Dominick (fractional quantities are possible), then calculate the share of their total orange consumption comprised of excellent oranges. Report, in percentage form, how much larger the share is for Dominick as compared to Wendell.

Wendell and Dominick both enjoy oranges, which come in two varieties: Good and Excellent! If we denote good oranges with the variable G and excellent oranges with the variable E, then both Wendell and Dominick would have preferences represented by: U = G*E. Wendell lives in Florida, where good oranges cost $0.7, and excellent oranges cost $2.44. Dominick lives in New York where both kinds of oranges cost $1.09 more than they do in Florida. Both Wendell and Dominick set aside $24 in their budget to buy oranges. Determine the optimal consumption bundles for Wendell and Dominick (fractional quantities are possible), then calculate the share of their total orange consumption comprised of excellent oranges. Report, in percentage form, how much larger the share is for Dominick as compared to Wendell.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Another instance when people are likely not to spend a dime (or a minute) on an item is when they have a dislike for mixing the item with other items available. In this case, we say the consumer has ‘non-convex preferences’ and indifference curves are bowed out from the origin. In plain language, the consumer has a preference for binging. We often feel this way towards our favorite social media app. Consider a kid who has four hours a day to spend on social media. They enjoy spending time on Snapchat (x) or spending time on Twitter (y). a) Write the kid’s time constraint and illustrate it in a graph where you measure time spent on Snapchat along the horizontal axis and time spent on Twitter along the vertical axis. This kid’s utility from time spent on Snapchat and time spent on Twitter is U(x,y) = 4x2+ y2. b) In your graph, draw a couple of the kid’s indifference curves. Notice how the kid’s |MRSY,X| increases along each curve as he spends more time on Snapchat and less time on…
I need help with this homework question.
A date with Alex costs you $100 and gives you an additional 1000 units of utility. A date with Kelly costs you $200 and an additional 4,000 units of utility. Based only on the information you have, using the theory of rational choice, you most likely would: O be indifferent between the two dates O go on a date with Alex because the marginal utility per dollar is the greater of the two O go on a date with Kelly O go on a date with Alex
4. Two individuals, Amir and Budi, consume two goods, clothes (X) and shoes (Y). The utility functions for the two individuals are given as: Utility function of Amir, UA = 15X0.25Y0.75Utility function of Budi, UB = 25X0.5Y0.5 The current price for clothes (Px) is Rp 100,000 and the current price for shoes (PY) is Rp 150,000 a. Determine marginal rate of substitution (MRSXY)between clothes (X) and shoes (Y) for Amir and Budi! Please explain. b. Amir is currently consuming 5 units of clothes (X) and 10 units of shoes (Y), whereas Budi is consuming 12 units of clothes (X) and 8 units of shoes (Y). At this current consumption, have Amir and Budi reached the efficient allocation of clothes and shoes? If they have, explain why. If they have not, calculate the optimal allocation and explain. c. Considering the relative price between of clothes and shoes, at the current consumption, have Amir and Budi reached exchange equilibrium? Please explain d. Use the Edgeworth Box to illustrate the…
Alex, who was convinced that "Football is coming home", was very excited for the World Cup last year. Unfortunately, he realized that his favourite Paul Gascoigne jersey from Euro 1996 was getting old, so he wanted to buy a new one before England's first game the following week. He could either buy a 2014 James Milner shirt from retailer A, which would make him totally happy (utility=1), or a 2006 David Beckham shirt from retailer B, which gives him a utility of 0.8. However, the shirts are not available today. There is a 50% chance that retailer A will have the shirt on the week-end, and 70% chance that retailer B will have theirs on the week-end. Due to time and work constraints, Alex can only visit one of these retailers before the tournament starts, otherwise he will have to keep his old 1996 shirt, which gives him a utility of 0.5. He can also ask his friend Nathan to check both places in the morning. But being a Welsh supporter, Nathan will not do it for free and wants some money…
only question 1
Fang likes playing badminton with her friends. Her utility function for playing badminton every week is given by U(t) = 11t – 2t2, where t is measured in hours. They play on a badminton court, which they can rent per hour. Suppose the current price to play on the badminton court is £2.50 per hour. How many hours should Fang play if she wishes to maximise her utility? Explain what we mean by the principle of diminishing marginal utility. Does the principle apply in Fang’s case? Explain why. In a diagram with income in pound sterling on the horizontal axis and quantity on the vertical axis, show the relationship between Fang’s budget and the number of hours that would maximise her consumer surplus.
We have determined that Jenny's satisfaction from eating a Snickers bar is 30 utils, whereas Sarah's satisfaction from eating a Snickers bar is 15 utils. We also know that Jenny prefers Snickers bars over Milky Way bars. Which of the following statements can we say for sure are true? Drag the true statements to the box. Items (7 items) (Drag and drop into the appropriate area below) Jenny likes Snickers bars twice as much as Sarah does. Sarah likes Snickers bars more than Jenny likes Milky Way bars. Sarah likes Snickers bars more than Jenny does. Jenny likes Snickers bars more than Sarah does. Jenny's satisfaction from consuming a Milky Way bar must be less than 30 utils. There is not enough information to determine who likes Snickers bars the most. The price of the Snickers bar is needed in order to find out who likes it the most.
John’s preferences for apples (A) and berries (B) are represented by U(A,B)= A+2B . Apples cost £2 and berries £1. Given that John’s monthly income is £30 answer the following questions: What type of goods are apples and berries for John? What is the proportion to which John is willing to exchange apples for berries? Illustrate and solve graphically John’s utility maximization problem. If his income increases every month by £10, how will John’s consumption choice be affected? Illustrate graphically the income expansion path and the Engel curve for each good. How will an increase in the price of berries to £6 affect John’s optimal consumption choice? (John’s income is £30) Graph John’s demand curve for each good. Assume that John wins a voucher of £20, redeemable only in apples. How would this affect John’s utility? (Assume that prices and income are as described initially) Assume that John is presented with two options: an apple voucher of £20 or just £6 to spend on any good he wants.…