We are trying to prove that a proposition P(n) is true for all n > 0 using mathematical induction. Suppose we are trying to prove the k + 1 case, P(k+ 1), using strong mathematical induction. What are we allowed to do which we wouldn't do if we had been using weak mathematical induction? We are able to prove P(k+1) as an inequality instead of just an equality. We do not need to make an assumption about the lower bound for k (for example, we do not need to assume that k > 0). We can prove that P(k+1) → P(k+2) instead of P(k) → P(k + 1). We can use the fact that P(k-1) is true, for as long as (k − 1) > 0.
We are trying to prove that a proposition P(n) is true for all n > 0 using mathematical induction. Suppose we are trying to prove the k + 1 case, P(k+ 1), using strong mathematical induction. What are we allowed to do which we wouldn't do if we had been using weak mathematical induction? We are able to prove P(k+1) as an inequality instead of just an equality. We do not need to make an assumption about the lower bound for k (for example, we do not need to assume that k > 0). We can prove that P(k+1) → P(k+2) instead of P(k) → P(k + 1). We can use the fact that P(k-1) is true, for as long as (k − 1) > 0.
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
Related questions
Question
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e0e6/0e0e6fb5e0852cb36de351ca13a3abb16c9141a4" alt="Q5
We are trying to prove that a proposition P(n) is true for all n ≥ 0 using mathematical induction.
Suppose we are trying to prove the k + 1 case, P(k+ 1), using strong mathematical induction.
What are we allowed to do which we wouldn't do if we had been using weak mathematical
induction?
We are able to prove P(x + 1) as an inequality instead of just an equality.
We do not need to make an assumption about the lower bound for k (for example, we do not
need to assume that k > 0).
We can prove that P(k+1)→ P(k+ 2) instead of P(k) → P(k+ 1).
We can use the fact that P(k-1) is true, for as long as (k − 1) > 0."
Transcribed Image Text:Q5
We are trying to prove that a proposition P(n) is true for all n ≥ 0 using mathematical induction.
Suppose we are trying to prove the k + 1 case, P(k+ 1), using strong mathematical induction.
What are we allowed to do which we wouldn't do if we had been using weak mathematical
induction?
We are able to prove P(x + 1) as an inequality instead of just an equality.
We do not need to make an assumption about the lower bound for k (for example, we do not
need to assume that k > 0).
We can prove that P(k+1)→ P(k+ 2) instead of P(k) → P(k+ 1).
We can use the fact that P(k-1) is true, for as long as (k − 1) > 0.
Expert Solution
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00039/00039eaf710a9765f6db01fc5b9812260bf5cade" alt=""
Step 1
In normal induction we prove that if base case is true then we assume some number n to be true then we prove n+1 is true.
In strong induction, we only need to prove: For every positive integer n, if the result holds for all positive integers k < n, then the result holds for n.
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0cbe/e0cbe7c1cfa79a285a06530332b315bcf077d9a4" alt="Blurred answer"
Recommended textbooks for you
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/459cf/459cf6241d135de10054da228a1eeba40b2fb92a" alt="Advanced Engineering Mathematics"
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1fad9/1fad99a5e283e74e984c6bf7510d1f9836377e96" alt="Numerical Methods for Engineers"
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a87c/5a87cace12f9cc506b7a6251c6c030791d2a058d" alt="Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…"
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/459cf/459cf6241d135de10054da228a1eeba40b2fb92a" alt="Advanced Engineering Mathematics"
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1fad9/1fad99a5e283e74e984c6bf7510d1f9836377e96" alt="Numerical Methods for Engineers"
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a87c/5a87cace12f9cc506b7a6251c6c030791d2a058d" alt="Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…"
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21a4f/21a4f62f7828afb60a7e1c20d51feee166b1a145" alt="Mathematics For Machine Technology"
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1ae4/e1ae4278513a956743faa46779d19ccf451bd689" alt="Basic Technical Mathematics"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ba18/3ba18d7401cedc0b368d26ff888192ad5881f9c0" alt="Topology"