We assume that x0. Therefore there exists a natural number n such that n> Since z is fixed we can simply evaluate 1 and take the next largest natural number. Which of the following completes the proof?

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
icon
Related questions
Question
100%

Why is the one I chose wrong? Which is the correct one and why?

Therefore there must exist a natural number m such that nx < m< ny, and by dividing through by n we have x< m <y. Since n and m are both natural numbers and hence also integers, we have found
a rational number existing between x and y, as required.
We have that
n>1
= nz <1
= ny-nx < 1
Therefore there must exist a natural number m such that ny - nx <m, and hence y-x< m so y <x+ m, This shows that x+ m is a rational number greater than x but less than y. Since n and m are
both natural numbers and hence also integers, we have found a rational number existing between x and y, as required.
O None of these.
We have that
Therefore x <1<y so 1 is a rational number existing between x and y as required.
We have that
y-x
n(y-x)
Therefore there is a gap greater than 1 between y and x so it must necessarily contain an integer, which is a rational number. Therefore we have found a rational number between x and y, as required.
Transcribed Image Text:Therefore there must exist a natural number m such that nx < m< ny, and by dividing through by n we have x< m <y. Since n and m are both natural numbers and hence also integers, we have found a rational number existing between x and y, as required. We have that n>1 = nz <1 = ny-nx < 1 Therefore there must exist a natural number m such that ny - nx <m, and hence y-x< m so y <x+ m, This shows that x+ m is a rational number greater than x but less than y. Since n and m are both natural numbers and hence also integers, we have found a rational number existing between x and y, as required. O None of these. We have that Therefore x <1<y so 1 is a rational number existing between x and y as required. We have that y-x n(y-x) Therefore there is a gap greater than 1 between y and x so it must necessarily contain an integer, which is a rational number. Therefore we have found a rational number between x and y, as required.
We assume that x<y. We can make this assumption without loss of generality, since we can make this statement true by simply relabeling. Since x<y, there exists another real number z such that y-x = z and
z>0. Therefore there exists a natural number n such that n>1 Since z is fixed we can simply evaluate 1 and take the next largest natural number. Which of the following completes the proof?
We have that
n>1
= nz >1
a ny-nx> 1.
Therefore there must exist a natural number m such that nx < m < ny, and by dividing through by n we have x
m <y. Sincen and m are both natural numbers and hence also integers, we have found
a rational number existing between x and y, as required.
We have that
n>
» nz <1
→ ny-nx < 1
Therefore there must exist a natural numberm such that ny - nx <m, and hence y - x < so y <x + . This shows that x+ is a rational number greater than x but less than y. Since n and m are
both natural numbers and hence also Integers, we have found a rational number existing between x and y, as required.
O None of these.
We have that
- y-x> n
Therefore x <<y so is a rational number existing between x and y as required.
90 1155
We have that
Transcribed Image Text:We assume that x<y. We can make this assumption without loss of generality, since we can make this statement true by simply relabeling. Since x<y, there exists another real number z such that y-x = z and z>0. Therefore there exists a natural number n such that n>1 Since z is fixed we can simply evaluate 1 and take the next largest natural number. Which of the following completes the proof? We have that n>1 = nz >1 a ny-nx> 1. Therefore there must exist a natural number m such that nx < m < ny, and by dividing through by n we have x m <y. Sincen and m are both natural numbers and hence also integers, we have found a rational number existing between x and y, as required. We have that n> » nz <1 → ny-nx < 1 Therefore there must exist a natural numberm such that ny - nx <m, and hence y - x < so y <x + . This shows that x+ is a rational number greater than x but less than y. Since n and m are both natural numbers and hence also Integers, we have found a rational number existing between x and y, as required. O None of these. We have that - y-x> n Therefore x <<y so is a rational number existing between x and y as required. 90 1155 We have that
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Research Ethics
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, advanced-math and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Basic Technical Mathematics
Basic Technical Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134437705
Author:
Washington
Publisher:
PEARSON
Topology
Topology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134689517
Author:
Munkres, James R.
Publisher:
Pearson,