Vozzello is on a domestic flight heading from Seattle to Baltimore when he experiences a medical emergency. Thankfully, Doctor Amalia is also on the plane and is able to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation ("CPR") to keep him stabilized until they land, at which point he is taken to a local hospital for further treatment. Two weeks later, Vozzello is shocked when he receives a $37.000 bill from Amalia for the services she provided. Amalia argues that $37,000 is reasonable because she is a nationally renowned cardiovascular specialist who graduated from one of the top medical schools in the world. Which of the following statements is correct? O Since Vozzello benefitted from Amalia's services, an implied-in-fact contract was formed. He is therefore required by law to pay her typical rate, and $37.000 is justified considering her qualifications. O Since Vozzello benefitted from Amalia's services, an implied-in-law contract was formed. He is therefore required by law to pay her typical rate, and $37.000 is justified considering her qualifications. O Since Vozzello benefitted from Amalia's services, an implied-in-law contract was formed. However, he is only required by law to pay the market price determined by the court. O Since Vozzello benefitted from Amalia's services but did not perform verbal or written consent, he is not required by law to compensate her for her services. Such an obligation can only be enforced under an express contract. O Since Vozzello benefitted from Amalia's services, an implied-in-fact contract was formed. However, he is only required by law to pay the current market price for her services.
Vozzello is on a domestic flight heading from Seattle to Baltimore when he experiences a medical emergency. Thankfully, Doctor Amalia is also on the plane and is able to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation ("CPR") to keep him stabilized until they land, at which point he is taken to a local hospital for further treatment. Two weeks later, Vozzello is shocked when he receives a $37.000 bill from Amalia for the services she provided. Amalia argues that $37,000 is reasonable because she is a nationally renowned cardiovascular specialist who graduated from one of the top medical schools in the world. Which of the following statements is correct? O Since Vozzello benefitted from Amalia's services, an implied-in-fact contract was formed. He is therefore required by law to pay her typical rate, and $37.000 is justified considering her qualifications. O Since Vozzello benefitted from Amalia's services, an implied-in-law contract was formed. He is therefore required by law to pay her typical rate, and $37.000 is justified considering her qualifications. O Since Vozzello benefitted from Amalia's services, an implied-in-law contract was formed. However, he is only required by law to pay the market price determined by the court. O Since Vozzello benefitted from Amalia's services but did not perform verbal or written consent, he is not required by law to compensate her for her services. Such an obligation can only be enforced under an express contract. O Since Vozzello benefitted from Amalia's services, an implied-in-fact contract was formed. However, he is only required by law to pay the current market price for her services.
Related questions
Question
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps