A florist wants to determine if a new additive would helpUsing this dotplot and the difference in proportions fromextend the life of cut flowers longer than the originalthe samples, is there convincing evidence that the newadditive. The florist randomly selects 20 carnations andrandomly assigns 10 to the new additive and 10 to theoriginal additive. After three weeks, 6 carnations placedadditive was more effective?O Yes, because a difference in proportions of 0.4 ormore occurred 7 out of 200 times, meaning thedifference is statistically significant and the newin the new additive still looked healthy and 2 carnationsplaced in the original additive still looked healthy. Thedifference in proportions (new - original) for thecarnations that still looked healthy after three weeks wasadditive is more effective.0.4. Assuming there is no difference in the additives, 200simulated differences in sample proportions areYes, because a difference in proportions of 0.4 or lesoccurred 193 out of 200 times, meaning the differencis statistically significant and the new additive is moreeffective.displayed in the dotplot.O No, because a difference in proportions of 0.4 ormore occurred 7 out of 200 times, meaning thedifference is not statistically significant and the newSimulation for Difference inProportions of Carnation Healthadditive is not more effective.No, because a difference in proportions of 0.4 or lesoccurred 193 out of 200 times, meaning the differencin not otntintioalhe sianificent and the nouindditueinSubmitNextSave and ExitMark this and retumUSM suming there is no difference in the additives, 200occurred 193 out of 200 times, meaning the differencesimulated differences in sample proportions aredisplayed in the dotplot.is statistically significant and the new additive is moreeffective.Simulation for Difference inO No, because a difference in proportions of 0.4 orProportions of Carnation Healthmore occurred 7 out of 200 times, meaning thedifference is not statistically significant and the newadditive is not more effective.O No, because a difference in proportions of 0.4 or lessoccurred 193 out of 200 times, meaning the differenceis not statistically significant and the new additive isnot more effective.-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6Difference in proportions (new – original)NextSubmitSave and ExitMark this and retunUS V I 12:2

Name: A florist wants to determine if a new additive would helpUsing this d
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T07:07:12.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: A florist wants to determine if a new additive would helpUsing this dotplot and the difference in proportions fromextend the life of cut flowers longer than the originalthe samples, is there convincing evidence that the newadditive. The florist rand

The difference in proportions is given by, (new - original) = 0.4. There are 200 simulated…

Answered: Using this dotplot and the difference…

Math

Statistics

Using this dotplot and the difference in proportions from the samples, is there convincing evidence that the new additive was more effective?

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A paint company has large outlet stores in two cities. Ten samples of the weekly sales (in tons) for the two cities are as follows. City A: n = 10, X10 = 148.5, S1 = = 4.3. City B: n = 10, Y 10 = 144.2, S2 = 3.8. At a = 0.05 level of significance, test if the weekly sales are different. The following ¨answers" have been proposed. (a) The null hypothesis is that the weekly sales are the same and the alternative is that the they are not the same. By using an F test, we reject the null hypothesis. (b) The null hypothesis is that the weekly sales are the same and the alternative is that the they are not the same. By using an F test, we do not reject the null hypothesis. (c) The null hypothesis is that the weekly sales are the same and the alternative is that the they are not the same. By using a i test, we do not reject the null hypothesis. (d) The null hypothesis is that the weekly sales are the same and the alternative is that the they are not the same. By using a i test, we reject the…
You want to compare differences in prior arrests across ethnicity in your study, you measured ethnicity as white =0 black =1 hispanic=2, and other =3. Prior arrests was recorded as the number of prior arrests. which test would you perform to see if arrests differ across diffrent ethnic categories? A. ANOVA B. T-test
When you are testing the difference between two means, it is not important to distinguish whether the samples are independent of each other. True
On average, a sample of n = 36 scores will provide a better estimate of the population mean than a sample of n = 49 scores from the same population.
A water hose manufacturer has developed a light-weight hose for home owners. Besides being constructed of a lightweight material. one of the characteristics of the hose is that it shrinks when it is not in use. When in use, the length of hose extends to its advertised length of 50 feet. Twenty hoses are tested to see if the hoses extend to the length of 50 feet. The sample mean of the length of the hoses is 49 1/2 feet with a s of 15 inches. Test the hypothesis at alpha = .01 that the hoses are not equal to 50 feet.
How would you respond to Step 3 for the One-Sample Z test? When is it appropriate to use?
The Nero Match Company sells matchboxes that are supposed to have an average of 40 matches per box, with a = 10. A random sample of 92 matchboxes shows the average number of matches per box to be 42.8. Using a 1% level of significance, can you say that the average number of matches per box is more than 40? What are we testing in this problem? O single proportion