use pic to answer question, anova one way test 1. How would you interpret the main effect of time? a. averaging across time, there were signifcant differences in happiness between every condtion(imagery, memorabilia, control) b. averaging across condition(imagery, memorabilia, control) there were signficant differences in happiness across time c. averaging across condition(imagery, memorabila, control) there were no significant differences in happiness across time d. averaging across time, there were signifcant differences in happiness across the three conditions (imagery, memorabilia, control) 2. how would you interpret the main effect of condition? a. there were signifcant differences between condtion (imagery, memorabilia, control) averaging across time b. there were signifcant differences between pre and posttest happiness, averaging across condition(imagery, memorabilia, control) c. there were no signifcant differences between condtions averging across time d. there were signifcant differences between pre and posttest happiness, averaging across time 3. how would you interpret the interaction? a. there was a signficant difference in the pattern of difference across time b. there was a significant difference in the pattern of differences across condition c. there was no signficant interaction between condition and time d. there was a signifcant crossover interaction between time and condition

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
100%

use pic to answer question, anova one way test

1. How would you interpret the main effect of time?

a. averaging across time, there were signifcant differences in happiness between every condtion(imagery, memorabilia, control)

b. averaging across condition(imagery, memorabilia, control) there were signficant differences in happiness across time

c. averaging across condition(imagery, memorabila, control) there were no significant differences in happiness across time

d. averaging across time, there were signifcant differences in happiness across the three conditions (imagery, memorabilia, control)

2. how would you interpret the main effect of condition?

a. there were signifcant differences between condtion (imagery, memorabilia, control) averaging across time

b. there were signifcant differences between pre and posttest happiness, averaging across condition(imagery, memorabilia, control)

c. there were no signifcant differences between condtions averging across time

d. there were signifcant differences between pre and posttest happiness, averaging across time

3. how would you interpret the interaction?

a. there was a signficant difference in the pattern of difference across time

b. there was a significant difference in the pattern of differences across condition

c. there was no signficant interaction between condition and time

d. there was a signifcant crossover interaction between time and condition

The researchers thought that the omnibus F test was not telling the whole story. They looked back over the week and
created a new design based on their initial hypotheses. Since happiness was measured at the beginning of the study and ar
the end of the study, they created a second factor (pretest, posttest).
Using this "mixed-model" factorial ANOVA design, they set about testing whether the effectiveness of reminiscing
strategies looked different at pretest and posttest. Results indicated:
• No significant main effect of condition (imagery, memorability, control), p > .05, eta-squared = 0.00
• A significant main effect of time (pretest, posttest), F(1,59) = 4.70, p < 0.04, eta-squared = 0.07
• A significant condition X time interaction, F(2,59) = 3.22, p < 0.05, eta-squared = 0.10
%3D
%3D
Transcribed Image Text:The researchers thought that the omnibus F test was not telling the whole story. They looked back over the week and created a new design based on their initial hypotheses. Since happiness was measured at the beginning of the study and ar the end of the study, they created a second factor (pretest, posttest). Using this "mixed-model" factorial ANOVA design, they set about testing whether the effectiveness of reminiscing strategies looked different at pretest and posttest. Results indicated: • No significant main effect of condition (imagery, memorability, control), p > .05, eta-squared = 0.00 • A significant main effect of time (pretest, posttest), F(1,59) = 4.70, p < 0.04, eta-squared = 0.07 • A significant condition X time interaction, F(2,59) = 3.22, p < 0.05, eta-squared = 0.10 %3D %3D
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman