Use dimensional analysis to argue that the gravitational potential energy of a uniform-density sphere (mass M, radius R) must equal GM2 Ugrav = -(constant) where (constant) is some numerical constant. Be sure to explain the minus sign. The constant turns out to equal 3/5; you can derive it by calculating the (negative) work needed to assemble the sphere, shell by shell, from the inside out.
Use dimensional analysis to argue that the gravitational potential energy of a uniform-density sphere (mass M, radius R) must equal GM2 Ugrav = -(constant) where (constant) is some numerical constant. Be sure to explain the minus sign. The constant turns out to equal 3/5; you can derive it by calculating the (negative) work needed to assemble the sphere, shell by shell, from the inside out.
Related questions
Question
A white dwarf star is essentially a degenerate electron gas, with a bunch of nuclei mixed in to balance the charge and to provide the gravitational attraction that holds the star together. In this problem you will derive a relation between the mass and the radius of a white dwarf star, modeling the star as a uniform-density sphere. White dwarf stars tend to be extremely hot by our standards; nevertheless, it is an excellent approximation in this problem to set T = O.
Question is attached
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0487/f0487ff313e19c91ebac934085248060afd1de3a" alt="Use dimensional analysis to argue that the gravitational potential energy
of a uniform-density sphere (mass M, radius R) must equal
GM2
Ugrav = -(constant)
where (constant) is some numerical constant. Be sure to explain the minus
sign. The constant turns out to equal 3/5; you can derive it by calculating
the (negative) work needed to assemble the sphere, shell by shell, from the
inside out."
Transcribed Image Text:Use dimensional analysis to argue that the gravitational potential energy
of a uniform-density sphere (mass M, radius R) must equal
GM2
Ugrav = -(constant)
where (constant) is some numerical constant. Be sure to explain the minus
sign. The constant turns out to equal 3/5; you can derive it by calculating
the (negative) work needed to assemble the sphere, shell by shell, from the
inside out.
Expert Solution
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00039/00039eaf710a9765f6db01fc5b9812260bf5cade" alt=""
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0cbe/e0cbe7c1cfa79a285a06530332b315bcf077d9a4" alt="Blurred answer"