(USCS units) Determine the shrink rule to be used by pattern makers for magnesium. Using the shrinkage value in Table 10.1, express your answer in terms of decimal frac- tion inches of elongation per foot of length compared to a standard one-foot scale.
(USCS units) Determine the shrink rule to be used by pattern makers for magnesium. Using the shrinkage value in Table 10.1, express your answer in terms of decimal frac- tion inches of elongation per foot of length compared to a standard one-foot scale.
Elements Of Electromagnetics
7th Edition
ISBN:9780190698614
Author:Sadiku, Matthew N. O.
Publisher:Sadiku, Matthew N. O.
ChapterMA: Math Assessment
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1.1MA
Related questions
Question
The table provided is table 10.1, therefore table 10.1 and table 5.1 are the same table. Please show all your work.
:D thank you
Transcribed Image Text:**Problem 10.9 (USCS units)**
Determine the shrink rule to be used by pattern makers for magnesium. Using the shrinkage value in Table 10.1, express your answer in terms of decimal fraction inches of elongation per foot of length compared to a standard one-foot scale.
![**Table 5.1: Typical Linear Shrinkage Values for Different Casting Metals Due to Solid Thermal Contraction**
| Metal | Linear Shrinkage |
|--------------------|------------------|
| Aluminum alloys | 1.3% |
| Brass, yellow | 1.3% - 1.6% |
| Cast iron, gray | 0.8% - 1.3% |
| Cast iron, white | 2.1% |
| Magnesium | 2.1% |
| Magnesium alloy | 1.6% |
| Nickel | 2.1% |
| Steel, carbon | 1.6% - 2.1% |
| Steel, chrome | 2.1% |
| Tin | 2.1% |
| Zinc | 2.6% |
*Compiled from [108].*
**Explanation:**
This table presents the typical linear shrinkage percentages for various metals and alloys when subjected to solid thermal contraction during casting processes. The shrinkage values represent the percentage reduction in linear dimensions post-solidification.
- **Aluminum alloys** exhibit a moderate shrinkage at 1.3%.
- **Brass, yellow**, and **Cast iron, gray** have variable shrinkage rates, indicating a range based on specific composition or conditions.
- **Cast iron, white**, **Magnesium**, **Nickel**, **Steel, chrome**, and **Tin** show a higher and consistent shrinkage value of 2.1% each.
- **Magnesium alloy** and **Steel, carbon** show slight variability with a maximum of 2.1%.
- **Zinc** has the highest shrinkage rate at 2.6%, reflecting its tendency for greater contraction upon solidification.](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2F7d0c803a-601a-4460-8a85-87d4415870e7%2Fca0226c8-f444-469b-8ae1-ce65e0470c66%2Fgjw3hjir_processed.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:**Table 5.1: Typical Linear Shrinkage Values for Different Casting Metals Due to Solid Thermal Contraction**
| Metal | Linear Shrinkage |
|--------------------|------------------|
| Aluminum alloys | 1.3% |
| Brass, yellow | 1.3% - 1.6% |
| Cast iron, gray | 0.8% - 1.3% |
| Cast iron, white | 2.1% |
| Magnesium | 2.1% |
| Magnesium alloy | 1.6% |
| Nickel | 2.1% |
| Steel, carbon | 1.6% - 2.1% |
| Steel, chrome | 2.1% |
| Tin | 2.1% |
| Zinc | 2.6% |
*Compiled from [108].*
**Explanation:**
This table presents the typical linear shrinkage percentages for various metals and alloys when subjected to solid thermal contraction during casting processes. The shrinkage values represent the percentage reduction in linear dimensions post-solidification.
- **Aluminum alloys** exhibit a moderate shrinkage at 1.3%.
- **Brass, yellow**, and **Cast iron, gray** have variable shrinkage rates, indicating a range based on specific composition or conditions.
- **Cast iron, white**, **Magnesium**, **Nickel**, **Steel, chrome**, and **Tin** show a higher and consistent shrinkage value of 2.1% each.
- **Magnesium alloy** and **Steel, carbon** show slight variability with a maximum of 2.1%.
- **Zinc** has the highest shrinkage rate at 2.6%, reflecting its tendency for greater contraction upon solidification.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps with 3 images
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, mechanical-engineering and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Elements Of Electromagnetics
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9780190698614
Author:
Sadiku, Matthew N. O.
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Mechanics of Materials (10th Edition)
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9780134319650
Author:
Russell C. Hibbeler
Publisher:
PEARSON
Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781259822674
Author:
Yunus A. Cengel Dr., Michael A. Boles
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Elements Of Electromagnetics
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9780190698614
Author:
Sadiku, Matthew N. O.
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Mechanics of Materials (10th Edition)
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9780134319650
Author:
Russell C. Hibbeler
Publisher:
PEARSON
Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781259822674
Author:
Yunus A. Cengel Dr., Michael A. Boles
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Control Systems Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781118170519
Author:
Norman S. Nise
Publisher:
WILEY
Mechanics of Materials (MindTap Course List)
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781337093347
Author:
Barry J. Goodno, James M. Gere
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Engineering Mechanics: Statics
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781118807330
Author:
James L. Meriam, L. G. Kraige, J. N. Bolton
Publisher:
WILEY