There are 2 players. They take Ston eS From the Pilt of 6 Stones.Player 1 can takt only 2 or 3 Stones. piayer 2 can taKeS only2 or 4 StonesS. P layers take turns, observe dil Previous moves,and player 1 mover first. A pla yer loses if She can not makea legal move, While another player ir declared the Winner.Let the pay oF OF Winning egval to 1 and the payoFF OFlosing equal to 0.a) represent the in ɛxtemsive Form (depict Only legalmoes)b) Find all SPNE OF this game& explain your a mwwer.Who Will Win ?gameOnly legalmar)

Nash equilibrium is the point of a game corresponding to which each participant optimizes his…

There are 2 players. They take Stones From the Pilt of 6 stones. Player 1 can take only 2 or 3 Stones, player 2 can takes only 2 or 4 Stones. Players take turns, observe all previous moves, and player 1 Moves first. A player loses if she can not make a legal move, while another player is declared the Winner. Let the pay OFF OF Winning equal to 1 and the pay OFF OF loving equal to 0. a) represent the game in Extensive Form (depict only legal moves) b) Find all SPNE of this game & explain your answer. Who Will Win ?

There are 2 players. They take Stones From the Pilt of 6 stones. Player 1 can take only 2 or 3 Stones, player 2 can takes only 2 or 4 Stones. Players take turns, observe all previous moves, and player 1 Moves first. A player loses if she can not make a legal move, while another player is declared the Winner. Let the pay OFF OF Winning equal to 1 and the pay OFF OF loving equal to 0. a) represent the game in Extensive Form (depict only legal moves) b) Find all SPNE of this game & explain your answer. Who Will Win ?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Two hunters are on a stag hunt. They split up in the forest and each have two strategies: hunt for a stag (S), or give up the stag hunt and instead hunt for rabbit (R). If they both hunt for a stag, they will succeed and each earn a payoff of 9. If one hunts for stag and the other gives up and hunts for rabbit, the stag hunter receives 0 and the rabbit hunter 8. If both hunt for rabbit then each receives 7. Compute all Nash equilibria for this game, called 'The Stag Hunt', depicted below. Which of these equilibria do you think is most likely to be played? Why? S R S 9,9 8,0 R 0,8 7,7
Person A can trust or not trust person B. If person A decides to not trust, both players get a zero payoff. If Person A trusts, Person B can abuse or honour the trust bestowed upon them. If person B abuses Person A's trust, Person A gets a negative payoff. If person B honours person A's trust, person A gets a positive payoff. Person B can be of two types: trustworthy or not trustworthy. Both trustworthy and untrustworthy person B types get a positive payoff if they honour A's trust. But a trustworthy person B prefers to honour person A's trust whereas an untrustworthy B prefers to abuse. 2 Nature determines randomly if person B is trustworthy or not. Person B knows if they are trustworthy or not but person A doesn't know. The probability that person B is not trustworthy is a and the probability that person B is trustworthy is 1 a. a is common knowledge, meaning that both person A and person B know the probability of person B being (not) trustworthy. a) Draw the extensive game version…
Please explain how to solve the question and arrive at the provided answer. Thank you.
Player 1 is an Internet service provider and Player 2 is a potential customer. They consider entering into a contract of service for a period of time. The provider decides between two levels of service: High or Low. The potential customer decides whether to Buy or Not Buy. When the potential customer calls customer service, the Internet service provider makes the initial offer.The potential customer then decides whether to Buy or Not Buy. Let’s say that the interaction ends after the potential customer makes their decision. Please set up the extensive form according to the following outcomes: i. If the Internet service provider offers Low and the potential customer doesn’t buy, they both make off with 1. ii. If the Internet service provider offers Low and the potential customer buys, the Internet service provider makes off with 3, and the customer receives 0. iii. If the Internet service provider offers High and the potential customer doesn’t buy, the Internet service provider makes…
Consider the following game played by four individuals, players 1, 2, 3, and 4. Each individual has $10,000. Each player can donate between $0 and $10,000 to build a public park that costs $20,000. If they collect enough money, they construct the park, which is worth $9,000 to each of them. However, if they collect less than $20,000, they cannot build a park. Furthermore, regardless of whether the park is built or not, individuals lose any donations that they make. a) Describe the Nash equilibria for a simultaneous game. What makes them equilibria? Hint: There are many equilibria, so you may want to use a mathematical expression! b) Suppose that players 1, 2, and 3, each donate $4,000 for the park. How much will player 4 donate and why. What are the resulting payoffs for the players? c) Suppose instead that player 1 donated first, player 2 second, player 3 third, and player 4 last. Furthermore, players could only donate in intervals of 1,000 (0, $1,000, $2,000, etc.). How much will…
Jesse and Janie are playing a game. On the table in front of them, there are 50 coins. They take turns removing some of these coins from the table. At each turn, the person moving can remove either 1,2,3,4,5,6, or 7 coins (they cannot remove 0 or 8, etc.). The person to remove the last coin wins. Suppose Janie is the first player to have a turn (a) In the subgame perfect equilibrium, Janie begins by taking _________coins (b) Suppose Janie makes a mistake in play and removes a number of coins that leaves 27 coins on the table when it is jesses turn. To have a chance at winning, Jesse should remove _________ Coins
38. Consider the following game. There are ten churches in town: nine are Catholic and one is Eastern Orthodox. All churches conduct their divine services at 10am on Sunday morning. You and your friend, without communication, agree to meet at a church service. If you fail to meet at the same church, then you are sad and become a Doomer. What is this game's focal point? Remember that you cannot communicate about this. (A) You meet at any of the Catholic churches. (B) You meet at any of the churches – denomination does not matter. We're all the same bro. (C) You meet at the Orthodox church. (D) There is no focal point. 39. Consider a fractional-reserve banking system in which an initial deposit of $1,000 can generate up to $4,000 in money. What is the reserve ratio? (A) 4 percent. (B) 5 percent. (C) 25 percent. (D) 75 percent.
Consider the following game. You will roll a fair, 6-sided die either once or twice. You decide whether to do the second roll after you see how the first one lands. The payoff is $n, where n is the outcome of the last roll. For example, if the first roll lands 4 and the second lands 2, you win $2. If you only do one roll and it lands 4, you win $4. Suppose you make your decision about whether to go for a second roll based on expected monetary value. Then you will go for a second roll if (and only if) the first roll lands x or lower. What is x?
in game theory, when are there player 1 and palyer 2 and the payoff function is as follow (if player 1 get to choose first) (u1, u2). my question is if the order change like player 2 get to choose first, will the order of the payoff change as well like (u2, u1)?
For the friend-foe game, recall that there were 3 Nash equilibria possible, but the equilibria set didn't include the cooperative outcome, for which both players would win. Friend Foe Friend 500,500 0,1000 Foe 1000,0 0.0 a) If the game is played répeatedly. propose a play strategy that will enforce cooperation. For what valucs of o (discount factor) the equilibrium will be (Friend. Friend)?
If the players play pure strategies, the game has no Nash equilibrium. But what if they choose their moves randomly? Let each player instead opt for a mixed strategy instead of a pure strategy. The first will play action Z with probability p, and the second will play action L with probability q. At which pair (p, q) are the mixed strategies of the players in equilibrium? At which pair (p, q) does neither player want to change strategy? When are both strategies simultaneously the best response?
a) Find the Nash equilibria in the game (in pure and mixed strategies) and the associated payoffs for the players. b) Now assume that the game is extended in the following way: in the beginning Player 1 can decide whether to opt out (this choice is denoted by O) or whether to play the simultaneous-move game in a) (this choice is denoted by G). If Player 1 opts out (plays O) then both Player 1 and Player 2 get a payoff of 4 each and the game ends. If Player 1 decides to play G, then the simultaneous-move game is played. Find the pure-strategy Nash equilibria in this extended version of the game. (Hint: note that Player 1 now has 4 strategies and write the game up in a 4x2 matrix.) c) Write the game in (b) up in extensive form (a game tree). Identify the subgames of this game.