The wrist extension in degrees was measured for each of 36 randomly selected individuals as they useda prototype of a new computer mouse. The results were ī = 20.4 and s = 1.5. The researchers wishto test Ho : µ = 20 versus Ha : µ > 20 at the 10% level of significance. (Extension of more than 20° isknown to increase the risk of injury under repeated use.)The rejection region for the test is:(b) [2.326, ∞)(d) (-∞0, –1.282] U [1.282, 0)(a) [1.645, )(e) (-x, –1.645] U [1.645, ∞)(c) [1.282, x)The correct decision and justification are:(a) Reject Ho because n > 30.(b) Reject Ho because 20.4 > 20.(c) Reject Ho because the test statistic falls in the rejection region.(d) Do not reject Ho because the test statistic does not fall in the rejection region.(e) Do not reject Họ because the observed significance is greater than .10.

Given that wrist extension is measured for 36 randomly selected individuals. Therefore the sample…

The wrist extension in degrees was measured for each of 36 randomly selected individuals as they used a prototype of a new computer mouse. The results were ī = 20.4 and s = 1.5. The researchers wish to test Ho : u = 20 versus Ha : u > 20 at the 10% level of significance. (Extension of more than 20° is known to increase the risk of injury under repeated use.) The rejection region for the test is: (a) [1.645, ∞) (b) [2.326, 0) (c) [1.282, x) (d) (-∞, –1.282] U [1.282, ) (e) (-x, –1.645] U [1.645, ) The correct decision and justification are: (a) Reject Ho because n 2 30. (b) Reject Ho because 20.4 > 20. (c) Reject Ho because the test statistic falls in the rejection region. (d) Do not reject Ho because the test statistic does not fall in the rejection region. (e) Do not reject Họ because the observed significance is greater than .10.

The wrist extension in degrees was measured for each of 36 randomly selected individuals as they used a prototype of a new computer mouse. The results were ī = 20.4 and s = 1.5. The researchers wish to test Ho : u = 20 versus Ha : u > 20 at the 10% level of significance. (Extension of more than 20° is known to increase the risk of injury under repeated use.) The rejection region for the test is: (a) [1.645, ∞) (b) [2.326, 0) (c) [1.282, x) (d) (-∞, –1.282] U [1.282, ) (e) (-x, –1.645] U [1.645, ) The correct decision and justification are: (a) Reject Ho because n 2 30. (b) Reject Ho because 20.4 > 20. (c) Reject Ho because the test statistic falls in the rejection region. (d) Do not reject Ho because the test statistic does not fall in the rejection region. (e) Do not reject Họ because the observed significance is greater than .10.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A study of parental empathy for sensitivity cues and baby temperament (higher scores mean more empathy) was performed. Let x, be a random variable that represents the score of a mother on an empathy test (as regards her baby). Let x, be the empathy score of a father. A random sample of 35 mothers gave a sample mean of x, = 69.38. Another random sample of 34 fathers gave x, = 57.34. Assume that o, = 11.27 and o, = 11.17. (a) Let u, be the population mean of x, and let u, be the population mean of x,. Find a 99% confidence interval for u, - µz. (Round your answers to two decimal places.) lower limit upper limit (b) Examine the confidence interval and explain what it means in the context of this problem. Does the confidence interval contain all positive, all negative, or both positive and negative numbers? What does this tell you about the relationship between average empathy scores for mothers compared with those for fathers at the 99% confidence level? O Because the interval contains…
Consider testing Ho: μ = 20 against Ha: μ< 20 where u is the mean number of latex gloves used per week by all hospital employees, based on the summary statistics n = 42, x= 19.1, and s = 11.8. Complete parts a and b. a. Compute the p-value of the test. The p-value of the test is. (Round to four decimal places as needed.)
Given the test statistic -1.6752 from a Welch's T-test with H0: u1-u2= 0 vs Ha: u1-u2 does not equal 0 where s1=.97, s2=.89, n1=35 and n2=29, compute the p-value.
2
Find the corresponding z-score for a sample of n = 16 and M = 38 taken from a population with a mean of μ= 40 and σ = 8.
You obtain a t comp of .975 in a two sample independent t test with alpha at .05. Is it significant?
In a breeding experiment, white chickens with small combs were mated and produced 190 offspring of the types shown in the accompanying table. Are these data consistent with the Mendelian expected ratios of 9:3:3:1 for the four types? Use a chi-square test at a = 0.10.
Using the following data, calculate the χ2, the degrees of freedom, and the effect size. Would the researcher accept or reject the null hypothesis and what can be said about the effect size? Gun Control Gender Against For Total Male 180 90 270 Female 60 170 230 240 260 500
A random sample of 500 adult residents of Maricopa County found that 361 were in favor of increasing the highway speed limit to 75 mph, while another sample of 400 adult residents of Pima County found that 292 were in favor of the increased speed limit. Do these data indicate that there is a difference in the support for in increasing the speed limit between the residents of the two counties? Use a = 0.05. (a) Test the hypothesis Ho: P₁ = P2 versus H₁: P₁ P2. What is zo? Round your answer to two decimal places (e.g. 98.76). Zo = (b) Is it reasonable to conclude that there is a difference in the support for increasing the speed limit between the residents of the two counties?
The NAEP considers that a national average of 283 is an acceptable performance. Using α = .05, run a two-tail t-test for one sample to test Ho: µ=283 for the 2019 scores. Report the t-obt, df, and p-values. Would you reject the null hypothesis that the 2019 scores come from a population with average 283? If this is the case, does it come from a population from larger or smaller average?
The salaries of a random sample of 12 teachers from state A and 12 teachers from state B are shown in the table. At alpha= 0.05, is there enough evidence to support the claim that there is a difference in the salaries earned by teachers in state A and state B? Calculate the test statistic. State A B OA. 1.41 OB. -2.17 OC, 0.66 OD. -0.84 Teacher's Salary (thousands of dollars) 41 44 44 33 48 38 41 24 28 35 25 44 17 27 38 26 22 16 49 29 24 35 50 40
the data support the claim that the average ACT composite score of students from this students is randomly selected from a local high school with an X = 23 and s = 5.2. Do ACT composite scores are normally distributed with a u = 21. A sample of 25 students is randomly selected from a local high school with an X= 23 and s =5.L.D high school is different than 21 on the ACT composite score, using x = .05?