The table below lists the frequency of wins for different post positions in a horse race. A post position of 1 is closest to the inside​ rail, so that horse has the shortest distance to run.​ (Because the number of horses varies from year to​ year, only the first 10 post positions are​ included.) Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions. Based on the​ result, should bettors consider the post position of a horse​ race?   Post Position 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   Wins 20 15 12 16 15 7 9 12 6 12 Determine the null and alternative hypotheses.   H0​: ▼   At least one post positions have a different frequency of wins than the others. Wins occur with equal frequency in the different post positions. Wins occur with all different frequency in the different post positions. At least one post position has a different frequency of wins than the others. H1​: ▼   At least one post position has a different frequency of wins than the others. Wins occur with equal frequency in the different post positions. At least one post positions have a different frequency of wins than the others. Wins occur with all different frequency in the different post positions. Calculate the test​ statistic, χ2.   χ2=nothing ​(Round to three decimal places as​ needed.) Calculate the​ P-value.   ​P-value=nothing ​(Round to four decimal places as​ needed.) What is the conclusion for this hypothesis​ test?     A. Fail to reject H0. There is insufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions.   B. Reject H0. There is insufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions.   C. Reject H0. There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions.   D. Fail to reject H0. There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions.. Based on the​ result, should bettors consider the post position of a horse​ race?     No   Yes   Click to select your answer(s).

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
The table below lists the frequency of wins for different post positions in a horse race. A post position of 1 is closest to the inside​ rail, so that horse has the shortest distance to run.​ (Because the number of horses varies from year to​ year, only the first 10 post positions are​ included.) Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions. Based on the​ result, should bettors consider the post position of a horse​ race?
 
Post Position
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
 
Wins
20
15
12
16
15
7
9
12
6
12
Determine the null and alternative hypotheses.
 
H0​:
 
At least one post positions have a different frequency of wins than the others.
Wins occur with equal frequency in the different post positions.
Wins occur with all different frequency in the different post positions.
At least one post position has a different frequency of wins than the others.
H1​:
 
At least one post position has a different frequency of wins than the others.
Wins occur with equal frequency in the different post positions.
At least one post positions have a different frequency of wins than the others.
Wins occur with all different frequency in the different post positions.
Calculate the test​ statistic,
χ2.
 
χ2=nothing
​(Round to three decimal places as​ needed.)
Calculate the​ P-value.
 
​P-value=nothing
​(Round to four decimal places as​ needed.)
What is the conclusion for this hypothesis​ test?
 
 
A.
Fail to reject
H0.
There is
insufficient
evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions.
 
B.
Reject
H0.
There is
insufficient
evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions.
 
C.
Reject
H0.
There is
sufficient
evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions.
 
D.
Fail to reject
H0.
There is
sufficient
evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions..
Based on the​ result, should bettors consider the post position of a horse​ race?
 
 
No
 
Yes
 
Click to select your answer(s).
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Chi-squared Tests
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman