The situation is the case of 'Partially Aligned Interests: Financial Adviser and Investor' in Chapter 9. You will complete a similar analysis for the case where the adviser's report has to be the coarser choice between B or "not B." In this case, the game is represented as the following tree: Nature ● B (1/3) M (1/3) G (1/3) Bad Adviser ● Not Bad Adviser • Not Bad Adviser ● Not Bad You You You Invest Not Invest Not i Invest I Not Not Invest "Not 2,-52 0,0 2-L, -52 0,0 2.2, -1.2 0,0 13, 42 0, 0 where L is the cost of lost reputation from exaggeration. The babbling Nash Equilibrium of this game is

The situation is the case of 'Partially Aligned Interests: Financial Adviser and Investor' in Chapter 9. You will complete a similar analysis for the case where the adviser's report has to be the coarser choice between B or "not B." In this case, the game is represented as the following tree: Nature ● B (1/3) M (1/3) G (1/3) Bad Adviser ● Not Bad Adviser • Not Bad Adviser ● Not Bad You You You Invest Not Invest Not i Invest I Not Not Invest "Not 2,-52 0,0 2-L, -52 0,0 2.2, -1.2 0,0 13, 42 0, 0 where L is the cost of lost reputation from exaggeration. The babbling Nash Equilibrium of this game is

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

8) Consider the following game: There are 10 players. Each player is asked to write a number between 0 and 100. The player whose choice is closest to half of the average is the winner. Describe the game and discuss what would you expect to be the average number if the game were played in class with your colleagues. Do you expect them to play the Nash equilibrium strategy? Explain.
Asaaap
Chris Evans (Don't Party, Stalk) Party Don't Party Find the Nash equilibrium for this simultaneous move game. (Party, Don't Stalk) (Don't Party, Don't Stalk) Paparazzo (Party, Stalk) Stalk 3,4 1, 1 Don't Stalk 4, 2 1,2
Construct the normal representation and the fully reduced normal representation of the game shown in Figure 1. 0 (0.5) (0.5) 1.r 1.s W1 X1 y1 Z1 0,0 2.t 2.t 0,4 a2 b2 a2 b2 Figure 1: Extensive-form game 2,-2 -2,2 -2, 2 2,-2
John and Jane usually vote against each other’s party in the SSC elections resulting to negating or offsetting their votes. If they vote for their party of choice, each of them gains four units of utility (and lose four units of utility from a vote against their party of choice). However, it costs each of them two units of utility for the hassle of actually voting during the SSC elections. A. Diagram a game in which John and Jane choose whether to vote or not to vote.
Within a voluntary contribution game, the Nash equilibrium level of contribution is zero, but in experiments, it is often possible to sustain positive levels of contribution for a long period. How might we best explain this? A) Participants are altruistic, and so value the payoff which other participants receive, benefiting (indirectly) from making a contribution. B) Participants believe that if they make a contribution, then other participants will be more likely to make a contribution. C) Participants in experiments believe that they have to make contributions in order to receive any payoff from their participation. D) Participants have experience of working in situations in which cooperation can be sustained for mutual benefit and so have internalised a social norm of cooperation
QUESTION 4 Suppose there are 2 players in a non- cooperative game theory situation. Player A can move Up or Down while Player B can choose Left or Right. The following matrix contains the payoffs that each player receives under 4 scenarios. The first number in each cell refers to the payoffs for Player A. Player A Up Down A. B. C. 10, 60 D. 20, 80 Player B Suppose Player A moves first and Player B moves second. There is one equilibrium, Up, Left Left There is one equilibrium: Down, Right. 50, 90 40, 50 There are two equilibria, (Down, Left) and (Up, Right) Right There is one equilibrium in this game, Up Right
Topic is information economics
7
ROWENA 2 Answer 1: 2 Answer 2: 2 Answer 3: 1 Earth Water Wind Answer 4: Fire of the Nash equilibrium, (Rowena's 1 Colin's 3 3 North 1.3 This simultaneous game has two Nash equilibria. The Nash equilibrium, (Rowena's 2 , Colin's 1,2 3,2 2,0 COLIN South 3,1 1,2 2,1 3,0 East 0,2 2,3 1,1 West 1.1 1,1 0,3 2,2 ) has a greater joint payoff than that
What are Nash Equilibria in the following game? Select all that apply. Pizza Jazz 7 meats Seafood Jazz Veggie 20,7 9,8 9,8 Tasty Pizza BBQ 20, 13 9, 12 18, 12 Prawn 20, 7 9,9 18, 17 (Veggie, 7 meats) (Veggie, Seafood) (Veggie, Jazz) (BBQ, 7 meats) (BBQ, Seafood) (BBQ, Jazz) (Prawn, 7 meats) (Prawn, Seafood) (Prawn, Jazz) (9,8) O (20,13) (18,7)
P2