The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 14%. A warden suspects that this percent is higher if the sex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 319 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 54 of them became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the αα = 0.01 level of significance? For this study, we should use The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: (please enter a decimal) H1: (Please enter a decimal) The test statistic = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) The p-value is αα Based on this, we should the null hypothesis. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly higher than 14% at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 14%. The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly higher than 14% at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 14%. The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly higher than 14% at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 14%. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 14% and if another 319 convicted sex offender drug addicts are surveyed then there would be a 6.59% chance that more than 17% of the 319 convicted sex offender drug addicts in the study will become repeat offenders. There is a 6.59% chance that more than 14% of all convicted sex offender drug addicts become repeat offenders. If the sample proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 17% and if another 319 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed then there would be a 6.59% chance of concluding that more than 14% of all convicted sex offender drug addicts become repeat offenders. There is a 6.59% chance of a Type I error. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study. There is a 1% chance that Lizard People aka "Reptilians" are running the world. If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 14% and if another 319 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed, then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 14%. There is a 1% chance that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 14%. If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 14% and if another 319 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 14%.
The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 14%. A warden suspects that this percent is higher if the sex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 319 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 54 of them became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the αα = 0.01 level of significance? For this study, we should use The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: (please enter a decimal) H1: (Please enter a decimal) The test statistic = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) The p-value is αα Based on this, we should the null hypothesis. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly higher than 14% at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 14%. The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly higher than 14% at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 14%. The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly higher than 14% at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 14%. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 14% and if another 319 convicted sex offender drug addicts are surveyed then there would be a 6.59% chance that more than 17% of the 319 convicted sex offender drug addicts in the study will become repeat offenders. There is a 6.59% chance that more than 14% of all convicted sex offender drug addicts become repeat offenders. If the sample proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 17% and if another 319 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed then there would be a 6.59% chance of concluding that more than 14% of all convicted sex offender drug addicts become repeat offenders. There is a 6.59% chance of a Type I error. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study. There is a 1% chance that Lizard People aka "Reptilians" are running the world. If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 14% and if another 319 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed, then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 14%. There is a 1% chance that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 14%. If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 14% and if another 319 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 14%.
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Question
The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 14%. A warden suspects that this percent is higher if the sex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 319 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 54 of them became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the αα = 0.01 level of significance?
- For this study, we should use
- The null and alternative hypotheses would be:
Ho: (please enter a decimal)
H1: (Please enter a decimal)
- The test statistic = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)
- The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)
- The p-value is αα
- Based on this, we should the null hypothesis.
- Thus, the final conclusion is that ...
- The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly higher than 14% at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 14%.
- The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly higher than 14% at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 14%.
- The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly higher than 14% at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 14%.
- Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.
- If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 14% and if another 319 convicted sex offender drug addicts are surveyed then there would be a 6.59% chance that more than 17% of the 319 convicted sex offender drug addicts in the study will become repeat offenders.
- There is a 6.59% chance that more than 14% of all convicted sex offender drug addicts become repeat offenders.
- If the sample proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 17% and if another 319 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed then there would be a 6.59% chance of concluding that more than 14% of all convicted sex offender drug addicts become repeat offenders.
- There is a 6.59% chance of a Type I error.
- Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study.
- There is a 1% chance that Lizard People aka "Reptilians" are running the world.
- If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 14% and if another 319 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed, then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 14%.
- There is a 1% chance that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 14%.
- If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 14% and if another 319 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 14%.
Expert Solution
![](/static/compass_v2/shared-icons/check-mark.png)
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 5 steps with 3 images
![Blurred answer](/static/compass_v2/solution-images/blurred-answer.jpg)
Recommended textbooks for you
![MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781119256830/9781119256830_smallCoverImage.gif)
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
![Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305251809/9781305251809_smallCoverImage.gif)
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305504912/9781305504912_smallCoverImage.gif)
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781119256830/9781119256830_smallCoverImage.gif)
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
![Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305251809/9781305251809_smallCoverImage.gif)
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305504912/9781305504912_smallCoverImage.gif)
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134683416/9780134683416_smallCoverImage.gif)
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
![The Basic Practice of Statistics](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781319042578/9781319042578_smallCoverImage.gif)
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
![Introduction to the Practice of Statistics](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781319013387/9781319013387_smallCoverImage.gif)
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman