Question 2Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south different from the proportion of wildfirescaused by humans in the west? 380 of the 550 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south werecaused by humans while 404 of the 572 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused byhumans. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of significance?a. For this study, we should use Select an answerb. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:Ho: Select an answerSelect an answerSelect an answer v (please enter a decimal)H: Select an answer v Select an answer V Select an answer|(Please enter a decimal)c. The test statistic(please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)d. The p-value =e. The p-value is ? af. Based on this, we should Select an answerg. Thus, the final conclusion is that ...(Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)the null hypothesis.O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence toconclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is differentfrom the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to concludethat the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is different from thepopulation proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to concludethat the proportion of the 550 wildfires that were caused by humans in the south is differentfrom the proportion of the 572 wildfires that were caused by humans in the west.O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is statistically significantevidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in thesouth is equal to the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.

The level of significance is 0.01.

Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south different from the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west? 380 of the 550 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused by humans while 404 of the 572 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused by humans. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of significance?

Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south different from the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west? 380 of the 550 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused by humans while 404 of the 572 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused by humans. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of significance?

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018

18th Edition

ISBN:9780079039897

Author:Carter

Publisher:Carter

Chapter4: Equations Of Linear Functions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8SGR

See similar textbooks