Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south higher than the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west? 380 of the 581 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused by humans while 318 of the 503 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused by humans. What can be concluded at the a = 0.10 level of significance? a. For this study, we should use Select an answer b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: p1 Select an answer vp2 V (please enter a decimal) H1: p1 Select an answer vp2 vV (Please enter a decimal) c. The test statistic z v (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) d. The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) e. The p-value is > v f. Based on this, we should fail to reject the null hypothesis. g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.10, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is higher than the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.10, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is higher than the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.10, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is equal to the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.10, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of the 581 wildfires that were caused by humans in the south is higher than the proportion of the 503 wildfires that were caused by humans in the west.
Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south higher than the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west? 380 of the 581 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused by humans while 318 of the 503 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused by humans. What can be concluded at the a = 0.10 level of significance? a. For this study, we should use Select an answer b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: p1 Select an answer vp2 V (please enter a decimal) H1: p1 Select an answer vp2 vV (Please enter a decimal) c. The test statistic z v (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) d. The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) e. The p-value is > v f. Based on this, we should fail to reject the null hypothesis. g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.10, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is higher than the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.10, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is higher than the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.10, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is equal to the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.10, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of the 581 wildfires that were caused by humans in the south is higher than the proportion of the 503 wildfires that were caused by humans in the west.
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Question
Transcribed Image Text:Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south higher than the proportion of wildfires caused
by humans in the west? 380 of the 581 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused by
humans while 318 of the 503 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused by humans. What
can be concluded at the a = 0.10 level of significance?
a. For this study, we should use Select an answer
b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:
Ho: p1
Select an answer vp2
V (please enter a decimal)
H1: p1
Select an answer vp2
vV (Please enter a decimal)
c. The test statistic z v
(please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)
d. The p-value =
(Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)
e. The p-value is > v
f. Based on this, we should fail to reject
the null hypothesis.
g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ...
O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.10, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude
that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is higher than the
population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.
O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.10, so there is insufficient evidence to
conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is higher
than the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.
O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.10, so there is statistically significant
evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the
south is equal to the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.
O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.10, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude
that the proportion of the 581 wildfires that were caused by humans in the south is higher than
the proportion of the 503 wildfires that were caused by humans in the west.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps with 3 images
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman