The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 11%. A warden suspects that this percent is lower if the sex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 321 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 26 of them became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the αα = 0.01 level of significance? For this study, we should use Correct The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: Correct Correct Correct (please enter a decimal) H1: Correct Incorrect Correct (Please enter a decimal) p < The test statistic Correct = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) The p-value is αα Based on this, we should the null hypothesis. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly lower than 11% at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 11%. The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly lower than 11% at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 11%. The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly lower than 11% at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 11%. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. If the sample proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 8% and if another 321 convicted sex offender drug addicts are surveyed then there would be a 4.84% chance of concluding that fewer than 11% of convicted sex offender drug addicts become repeat offenders. There is a 11% chance of a Type I error. There is a 4.84% chance that fewer than 11% of all convicted sex offender drug addicts become repeat offenders. If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 11% and if another 321 inner city residents are surveyed then there would be a 4.84% chance that fewer than 8% of the 321 convicted sex offender drug addicts in the study become repeat offenders. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study. There is a 1% chance that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 11%. If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 11% and if another 321 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed, then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 11%. If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 11% and if another 321 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 11%. There is a 1% chance that Lizard People aka "Reptilians" are running the world.
The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 11%. A warden suspects that this percent is lower if the sex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 321 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 26 of them became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the αα = 0.01 level of significance? For this study, we should use Correct The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: Correct Correct Correct (please enter a decimal) H1: Correct Incorrect Correct (Please enter a decimal) p < The test statistic Correct = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) The p-value is αα Based on this, we should the null hypothesis. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly lower than 11% at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 11%. The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly lower than 11% at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 11%. The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly lower than 11% at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 11%. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. If the sample proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 8% and if another 321 convicted sex offender drug addicts are surveyed then there would be a 4.84% chance of concluding that fewer than 11% of convicted sex offender drug addicts become repeat offenders. There is a 11% chance of a Type I error. There is a 4.84% chance that fewer than 11% of all convicted sex offender drug addicts become repeat offenders. If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 11% and if another 321 inner city residents are surveyed then there would be a 4.84% chance that fewer than 8% of the 321 convicted sex offender drug addicts in the study become repeat offenders. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study. There is a 1% chance that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 11%. If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 11% and if another 321 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed, then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 11%. If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 11% and if another 321 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 11%. There is a 1% chance that Lizard People aka "Reptilians" are running the world.
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Student Edition 2015
1st Edition
ISBN:9781680331141
Author:HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
Publisher:HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
Chapter4: Writing Linear Equations
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 14CR
Related questions
Question
The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 11%. A warden suspects that this percent is lower if the sex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 321 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 26 of them became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the αα = 0.01 level of significance?
- For this study, we should use Correct
- The null and alternative hypotheses would be:
Ho: Correct Correct Correct (please enter a decimal)
H1: Correct Incorrect Correct (Please enter a decimal)p<
- The test statistic Correct = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)
- The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)
- The p-value is αα
- Based on this, we should the null hypothesis.
- Thus, the final conclusion is that ...
- The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly lower than 11% at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 11%.
- The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly lower than 11% at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 11%.
- The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly lower than 11% at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 11%.
- Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.
- If the sample proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 8% and if another 321 convicted sex offender drug addicts are surveyed then there would be a 4.84% chance of concluding that fewer than 11% of convicted sex offender drug addicts become repeat offenders.
- There is a 11% chance of a Type I error.
- There is a 4.84% chance that fewer than 11% of all convicted sex offender drug addicts become repeat offenders.
- If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 11% and if another 321 inner city residents are surveyed then there would be a 4.84% chance that fewer than 8% of the 321 convicted sex offender drug addicts in the study become repeat offenders.
- Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study.
- There is a 1% chance that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 11%.
- If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 11% and if another 321 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed, then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 11%.
- If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 11% and if another 321 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 11%.
- There is a 1% chance that Lizard People aka "Reptilians" are running the world.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 4 steps with 3 images
Recommended textbooks for you
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781680331141
Author:
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
Publisher:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781680331141
Author:
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
Publisher:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill