The median earnings for a 25 to 34 year old, full-time, year round worker with a high school education was about $31,830 in 2016, while similar workers with a bachelor's degree (but no further education) earned $49,990, and as a result, they pay more income tax. a. There is a private benefit for individuals who attend college and earn a bachelor's degree. b. Does an individual's attainment of a bachelor's degree generate an externality? There is no way to determine whether there is an externality in this case. No externality exists because all of the benefits of a college education are private. A positive externality exists because college educated individuals pay higher taxes and are often considered more valuable to employers than individuals without college diplomas. A negative externality exists because individuals who receive a bachelor's degree could have spent the time working instead of attending college. c. The private market for college education results in bachelor's degrees relative to the socially efficient outcome. too few individuals going to college to earn

The median earnings for a 25 to 34 year old, full-time, year round worker with a high school education was about $31,830 in 2016, while similar workers with a bachelor's degree (but no further education) earned $49,990, and as a result, they pay more income tax. a. There is a private benefit for individuals who attend college and earn a bachelor's degree. b. Does an individual's attainment of a bachelor's degree generate an externality? There is no way to determine whether there is an externality in this case. No externality exists because all of the benefits of a college education are private. A positive externality exists because college educated individuals pay higher taxes and are often considered more valuable to employers than individuals without college diplomas. A negative externality exists because individuals who receive a bachelor's degree could have spent the time working instead of attending college. c. The private market for college education results in bachelor's degrees relative to the socially efficient outcome. too few individuals going to college to earn

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A series of questions will rely on the following information describing Susan's decisions over working. Susan has 12 hours to allocate to labor or leisure. For each hour she works, she receives an after-tax wage of $5. She also receives $10/day in non-labor income. Susan's Labor-Leisure Choice C 110 თი ($) 100 90 80 80 70 60 50 50 40 30 20 20 10 U2 12 U1 U3 U4 0 1 2 3 4 5 8 7 8 9 10 11 At her optimal labor-leisure choice: How many hours will Susan work each day? [Select] How many hours of Leisure will Susan enjoy each day? What is Susan's consumption level? Select] [Select] 12 L (hrs)
How Should the US Reduce Economic Inequality? The rich are getting richer. And the super rich are getting super richer. We know some of the names: Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerburg, the Walton family (of Wal-Mart). This billionaire club is growing fast. In 2007, there were 946 billionaires in the world. By 2016, that number doubled to 1,810. Of these, 540 were Americans. A 2015 OxFam report warned that the combined wealth of the world's the widening gap is benefitting the top 1 percent. The top 0.1 percent is doing even better. As just one example, CEOS have seen the real value of their salaries increase more than 1,000 percent since the 1950s. Meanwhile, the average worker has seen the real value of his or her income decrease over the last three decades. EV richest 1 percent would soon surpass the com- bined wealth of the other 99 percent of people on the planet. Wealth inequality is an increasingly serious problem in the United States, a nation known as the land of opportu-…
Which of the following factors does NOT contribute to income inequality? A. THE RISE OF TWO-EARNER HOUSEHOLDS B. DIFFERENCES IN HUMAN CAPITAL C. DISCRIMINATION IN THE WORKPLACE D. GOVERNMENT POLICIES ON TAXES AND MINIMUM WAGE E. AN INCREASE IN AFTER-SCHOOL PROGRAMS
1. Describe how each of these changes is likely to affect poverty and inequality: a. Incomes rise for low-income and high-income workers, but rise more for the high-income earners b. Incomes fall for low-income and high-income workers, but fall more for high-income earners. 2. Based on the theory of rational ignorance, what should we expect to happen to voter turnout as the Internet makes information easier to obtain? 3. What is the cost of voting in an election? 4. What is the main factor preventing a large community from influencing policy in the same way as a special interest group? 5. How does the TANF attempt to loosen the poverty trap?
The Lorenz curve is used to show which of the following? a. The total income generated from all activities b. The degree of inequality in the distribution of income within a country c. The progressivity of the income-tax structure within a country d. The extent of wage differences among workers in similar occupations e. The change in the poverty rate within a country over time
How Should the US Reduce Economic Inequality? The rich are getting richer. And the super rich are getting super richer. We know some of the names: Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerburg, the Walton family (of Wal-Mart). This billionaire club is growing fast. In 2007, there were 946 billionaires in the world. By 2016, that number doubled to 1,810. Of these, 540 were Americans. A 2015 OxFam report warned that the combined wealth of the world's the widening gap is benefitting the top 1 percent. The top 0.1 percent is doing even better. As just one example, CEOS have seen the real value of their salaries increase more than 1,000 percent since the 1950s. Meanwhile, the average worker has seen the real value of his or her income decrease over the last three decades. EV richest 1 percent would soon surpass the com- bined wealth of the other 99 percent of people on the planet. Wealth inequality is an increasingly serious problem in the United States, a nation known as the land of opportu-…
how to find the 90/10 income ratio?
Question 2 of 5 Y 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 l total income per day. Consider the figure above and suppose the person has 7 hours per day to divide between labour and non-labour activities. A. If non-labour income is $0.50 per day, this individual will choose hours of work and will have $ hours instead and enjoy hours of leisure. Their income from labour will be $ B. If non-labour income increases to $2, they will work C. Comparing parts A and B above, the income elasticity of this person's labour is equal to hours of leisure. Their total income per day will now be $ (round to two decimal places) which is (elastic/inelastic). Now (ignoring the figure above) suppose aggregate labour supply is measured as aggregate number of hours worked (L) given wage (w). A. Graph the labour supply if L=5w. The (total) elasticity of labour supply is B. Graph the labour supply if L. = 14w. The (total) clasticity of labour supply is per day and they
Only typed answer Unlike traditional social welfare programs, the Earned Income Tax Credit has been shown to increase: a. both equity and efficiency. b. equity but not efficiency. c. efficiency but not equity. d. neither equity nor efficiency.
Should the government be involved to create more equality in income disparities
Using examples to frame your discussion, critically evaluate the impact of income taxes on labour supply.
The figure shows the distribution of pre-tax income for Canadian families in 2015. Distribution of Family Income, 2015 60- Which of the following best describes the distribution of pre-tax earnings? 50- A. Just over 40 percent of families earned less than $40,000 while just over 20 percent of families earned more than $100,000. 41.8% 40- 38.4% B. Nearly 40 percent of families earned less than $40,000 while just under 20 percent of families earned more than $100,000. O C. Just over 20 percent of families earned less than $40,000 while just over 40 percent of families earned more than $100,000. 30- 19.8% O D. Nearly 20 percent of families earned less than $40,000 while just under 40 percent of families earned more than $100,000. 20- 10- $40K to $100K Pre-tax Family Income < $40K $100K and over Percentage of Families