Answered: The E-k relation of a simple cubic… | bartleby

Related questions

Question

The E-k relation of a simple cubic lattice given by (4.79) is derived from
the tight-binding approximation. Show that near k≈ 0 this relation can be
expressed by
:-ħ²/26₁a².
Ek = Eno +
where m* = n²/2ßna².
And for kπ/a, show that the E-k relation is given by
ħ²k²
2m*
where m* =
Ek
ħ²k²
2m*
= Eno +

Expert Solution

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 35 images

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Blurred answer

Similar questions

results. OAKL Consider a pne dimensional infinite-wall potential V = ∞ for > Land z<0, and V0 for There are two identical spin half fermions in this potential well and spin states are dened by) and 4) for spin up and down, respectively. a) (Very easy) Find the eigenvalues and the corresponding wave functions for the potential well. b) (Ensy) Write the full wave function for the fermions in singlet state with possible minimum energy. e) (Easy) Write the full wave function for the fermions in triplet state with possible minimum energy
How do I solve for Problem 11.32? This problem is in a chapter titled, "Atomic Transitions and Radiation." This is under quantum mechanics. I'm not sure if the other picture relates to what we're looking for, yet it's still helpful.
The Morse oscillator modeling a different diatomic molecule has D = 384 kJ/mole and hw = 1240 cm-¹. (Again, 11.9627 J/mole = 1 cm ¹.) ✓ нал (a) What is the energy of the pictured eigenfunction? Report the energy in cm¹ above the minimum in the potential well. (b) How close to the dissociation limit is this state in kJ/mole, that is, what is the energy difference between this state and molecular dissociation?
A deuterium molecule (D2₂) at 30°K is known to be in the state, 1 /26 12/₂) = = |3|1, 1) + 4 |7, 3) + |7, 1) where , m) are eigenstates of the angular momentum operator. (a) If one were to measure L₂, what posible values one would get and what would be their associated probabilities? (b) Repeat (a) but for L². (c) What is the expectation value of the energy (E) of the molecule in this state, assuming purely rotational states. Take c= 30.4 cm-¹, where I=moment of inertia of D₂ and c=speed of light. Express your answer in eV. -
instead of V. 7) 16.2. Why might you expect the canonical partition function to scale exponentially with the system size, thus always ensuring that the Helmholtz free energy is extensive? 16.3. In a quantum
A system of 9 identical non-interacting spin-3/2 particles confined to a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator potential is in its minimum energy configuration for which E 5.75 eV. What is the minimum energy of the same system with 10 such particles? Recall that the energy levels of a single particle in a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator potential are given by En = (n+1) hwo with n = 0, 1, 2, .... =