The data show the number of viewers for television stars with certain salaries. Find the regression equation, letting salary be the independent (x) variable. Find the best predicted number of viewers for a television star with a salary of $2 million. Is the result close to the actual number of viewers, 5.1 million? Use a significance level of 0.05. Salary (millions of $) Viewers (millions) 101 8 8 3 12 12 8 9 5.5 7.4 6.8 4.7 5.6 6.6 2.3 9.1 E Click the icon to view the critical values of the Pearson correlation coefficient r. What is the regression equation? y=+x (Round to three decimal places as needed.) What is the best predicted number of viewers for a television star with a salary of $2 million? The best predicted number of viewers for a television star with a salary of $2 million is (Round to one decimal place as needed.) million. Is the result close to the actual number of viewers, 5.1 million? O A. The result is exactly the same as the actual number viewers of 5.1 million. O B. The result is not very close to the actual number of viewers of 5.1 million. OC. The result is very close to the actual number of viewers of 5.1 million. O D. The result does not make sense given the context of the data.

The data show the number of viewers for television stars with certain salaries. Find the regression equation, letting salary be the independent (x) variable. Find the best predicted number of viewers for a television star with a salary of $2 million. Is the result close to the actual number of viewers, 5.1 million? Use a significance level of 0.05. Salary (millions of $) Viewers (millions) 101 8 8 3 12 12 8 9 5.5 7.4 6.8 4.7 5.6 6.6 2.3 9.1 E Click the icon to view the critical values of the Pearson correlation coefficient r. What is the regression equation? y=+x (Round to three decimal places as needed.) What is the best predicted number of viewers for a television star with a salary of $2 million? The best predicted number of viewers for a television star with a salary of $2 million is (Round to one decimal place as needed.) million. Is the result close to the actual number of viewers, 5.1 million? O A. The result is exactly the same as the actual number viewers of 5.1 million. O B. The result is not very close to the actual number of viewers of 5.1 million. OC. The result is very close to the actual number of viewers of 5.1 million. O D. The result does not make sense given the context of the data.

A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)

10th Edition

ISBN:9780134753119

Author:Sheldon Ross

Publisher:Sheldon Ross

Chapter1: Combinatorial Analysis

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1.1P: a. How many different 7-place license plates are possible if the first 2 places are for letters and...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Please help me answer the following, thanks. ASAP
Interpret the regression results.
Using your favorite statistics software package, you generate a scatter plot with a regression equation and correlation coefficient. The regression equation is reported asy=−32.86x+33.54y=-32.86x+33.54and the r=−0.483r=-0.483.What proportion of the variation in y can be explained by the variation in the values of x?r² = %Report answer as a percentage accurate to one decimal place.
please assist with this non graded assisnment. A tutor provided me with incorrect answers so I am resubmitting my question.
Using your favorite statistics software package, you generate a scatter plot with a regression equation and correlation coefficient. The regression equation is reported asy=−36.16x+83.35y=-36.16x+83.35and the r=−0.945r=-0.945.What proportion of the variation in y can be explained by the variation in the values of x?r² = %Report answer as a percentage accurate to one decimal place.
sing your favorite statistics software package, you generate a scatter plot with a regression equation and correlation coefficient. The regression equation is reported asy=−13.29x+96.24y=-13.29x+96.24and the r=−0.78r=-0.78.What percentage of the variation in y can be explained by the variation in the values of x?r² = % (Report exact answer, and do not enter the % sign)
Using your favorite statistics software package, you generate a scatter plot with a regression equation and correlation coefficient. The regression equation is reported asy=−71.12x+92.48y=-71.12x+92.48and the r=−0.571r=-0.571.What proportion of the variation in y can be explained by the variation in the values of x?r² = %Report answer as a percentage accurate to one decimal place.
Using your favorite statistics software package, you generate a scatter plot with a regression equation and correlation coefficient. The regression equation is reported asy=−89.84x+54.15y=-89.84x+54.15and the r=−0.32r=-0.32.What proportion of the variation in y can be explained by the variation in the values of x?r² = %
The data shows the scores of 8 employees in an admission test and their academic performance. 1. Trace the regression line 2. What is the slope of the line? 3. What is the y-intercept? Score in admission test (x) 52 Grade (y) 80 61 79 86 79 45 95 90 75 58 82 60 80 45 70
PLEASE ANSWER 4,5 AND 6
Using your favorite statistics software package, you generate a scatter plot with a regression equation and correlation coefficient. The regression equation is reported asy=−62.75x+42.07y=-62.75x+42.07and the r=−0.022r=-0.022.What proportion of the variation in y can be explained by the variation in the values of x?r² = %Report answer as a percentage accurate to one decimal place.