The Concentrated Phosphate Export Association consists of the five largest phosphate producers. The Agency for International Development (AID) undertook to sell fertilizer to Korea and solicited bids. The association set prices and submitted a single bid on 300,000 tons. A paid the contract price, determined the amounts to be purchased, coordinated the procedure for buying, and undertook to resell to Korea. The Justice Department sued the association and its members, claiming that their actions violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act. What defense might the defendants have? What is the result?

The Concentrated Phosphate Export Association consists of the five largest phosphate producers. The Agency for International Development (AID) undertook to sell fertilizer to Korea and solicited bids. The association set prices and submitted a single bid on 300,000 tons. A paid the contract price, determined the amounts to be purchased, coordinated the procedure for buying, and undertook to resell to Korea. The Justice Department sued the association and its members, claiming that their actions violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act. What defense might the defendants have? What is the result?

Understanding Business

12th Edition

ISBN:9781259929434

Author:William Nickels

Publisher:William Nickels

Chapter1: Taking Risks And Making Profits Within The Dynamic Business Environment

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1CE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Define whistleblowing and explain the circumstances under which it would be justified Define a restraint of trade agreement and explain under what circumstances it would be valid. List five rules of netiquette.
When OTES developed its first online application for university math courses, BD sued both OES and Gone. BD contends that Gone has breached his covenant not to compete, because he is engaging in a competitive business in online learning resources in university-level math and science and that he has proprietary information regarding the development of science and math tutorial programs. BD further contends that OTES is engaging in tortious interference with contract. BD is Gone and OTES deny the claims, and state that Gone has not violated his employment agreement, because they are not engaging in a competitive business with BD. The law in Georgia was recently amended to include the following provisions: A covenant not to compete must be reasonable in terms of time, geographical area, and prohibited activities. A time period longer than 2 years is presumed to be unenforceable. The courts are permitted to blue-pencil (or reform) covenants that are otherwise unenforceable.…
Russell lives in United Arab Emirate (UAE) for the last 10 years. He has been separated from his wife, Kate since 2013, who resides in Barbados. In January 2023, he visited Barbados for a short vacation and the couple rekindled their relationship. On his departure in February 2023, he requested her to come to UAE to reside with him. As a token of his request, he promised her an allowance of USD$1000 per month, if she joins him in the UAE. She eventually migrated to UAE in April 2023, but Russell failed to make payments as promised. Kate subsequently sued him for the non payment of the monthly allowance. Russell is arguing that his wife has no valid case, because there was no intention to create legal relation. His wife knows that you are currently pursuing Business Law and is seeking your advice on this matter using the IRAC method. UK law
List and describe the forms in which a multinational enterprise may conduct its business in a foreign country.
Determine the buyer’s and seller’s responsibility in a commercial transaction. Unvergleichbar Gesellschaft AG, based in Bremen, Germany buys raw diamonds from Diamants Stornoway based in Longueuil, QC, under the following terms: Terms of sale: DPU Flughafen Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland, Incoterms 2020: a)On his way to Europe, over the Atlantic Ocean, the airplane disappears from the radar and never arrives in Germany. Who bears the risk?
In 1961, Ford Motor Company acquired Autolite, a manufacturer of spark plugs, in order to enter the profitable aftermarket for spark plugs sold as replacement parts. Ford and the other major automobile manufacturers had previously purchased original equipment spark plugs (those installed in new cars when they leave the factory) from independent producers such as Autolite and Champion, either at or below the producer’s cost. The independents were willing to sell original equipment plugs so cheaply because aftermarket mechanics often replace original equipment plugs with the same brand of spark plug. GM had already moved into the spark plug market by developing its own division. Ford decided to do so by means of a vertical merger under which it acquired Autolite. Prior to the Autolite acquisition, Ford bought 10 percent of the total spark plug output. The merger left Champion as the only major independent spark plug producer. Champion’s market share thereafter declined because Chrysler…
Business law discuss
Sungsam, Inc., a Taiwanese company, and nineteen other Asian companies (the Companies) collaborated to manufacture and sell transistors internationally. These transistors were used in a multitude of consumer goods, millions of which were sold in the United States, including Georgia. The state of Georgia sued the Companies in Georgia, alleging violating consumer protection laws. The Companies filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. In response, Plaintiff alleged that the Companies sold the transistors into international streams of commerce with the intent that they would be incorporated into millions of consumer products sold in the United States, including Georgia. Should the Companies motion be granted? © a. No because the Companies did not sell any products directly to Georgia consumers and did not conduct any business in Georgia. b. Yes because a foreign manufacturer’s placement of goods into the stream of commerce of the state of Georgia, with…
Granite Insurance Company entered into a treaty reinsurance agreement with Rock Solid Reinsurance (RSR). Granite's retention limit is $400,000 and RSR agreed to provide reinsurance for up to $2.0 million. If Granite writes an $800,000 policy, RSR is responsible for 50 percent of the losses. If Granite insures a $1.6 million risk, RSR is responsible for 75 percent of any losses. What type of reinsurance arrangement did Granite enter into with RSR? ما A) reinsurance pool B) surplus share reinsurance C) facultative reinsurance D) excess of loss reinsurance
Shawn buys 50 widgets at a store closing sale. He buys the widgets intending to use them around the house. He only uses 25, though, and decides to sell the remaining widgets online. Shawn lives in Colorado. He finds an individual buyer, Victoria, in Italy. Does the CISG apply if there is an issue with this contract? O No, because at least one party must be a merchant. Yes, because the contract does not state that the CISG does not apply. O Yes, because the CISG automatically applies when two signatory country parties enter into a contract. No, because the contract does not state that the CISG applies. O No, because these are two consumers.
Draft a bilateral contract using the following facts: Alice Parent wishes to hire Betty Chuckles to perform as a clown during her son's birthday party. Betty charges a fee of $150.00 to perform
In 2007, five major U.S. publishers had negotiated a new business model for e- book pricing with Apple, which was getting ready to launch the iPad. After at least one of the publishers threatened to delay the release of its digital editions to Amazon unless it switched to a more lucrative model, Amazon reluctantly agreed, and e-book prices rose across the industry to about $14.99. The U.S. Department of Justice later accused the parties of colluding to artificially raise e-book prices. a) Does this decision have any effect on the App Store or other Apple businesses? b) Who are the parties involved with this negotiation and what were their interest to negotiation? c) What would be the probable advantages and implications of this negotiation decision?