The cases of Prigg v. Pennsylvania and Dred Scott v. Sandford both a. said only states, and not the federal government, could capture runaway slaves. b. said slaves did not become free citizens when entering a non-slave state. c. said slaves became free citizens north of the Missouri Compromise line. d. said slaves had to pass citizenship tests before they could be freed
The cases of Prigg v. Pennsylvania and Dred Scott v. Sandford both a. said only states, and not the federal government, could capture runaway slaves. b. said slaves did not become free citizens when entering a non-slave state. c. said slaves became free citizens north of the Missouri Compromise line. d. said slaves had to pass citizenship tests before they could be freed
Related questions
Question
32. The cases of Prigg v. Pennsylvania and Dred Scott v. Sandford both
a. said only states, and not the federal government, could capture runaway slaves.
b. said slaves did not become free citizens when entering a non-slave state.
c. said slaves became free citizens north of the Missouri Compromise line.
d. said slaves had to pass citizenship tests before they could be freed
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
