The average number of accidents at controlled intersections per year is 5.8. Is this average more for intersections with cameras installed? The 48 randomly observed intersections with cameras installed had an average of 6 accidents per year and the standard deviation was 0.69. What can be concluded at the αα = 0.05 level of significance? For this study, we should use The null and alternative hypotheses would be: H0:H0: H1:H1: The test statistic = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)The p-value is ααBased on this, we should the null hypothesis.Thus, the final conclusion is that ...The data suggest that the population mean is not significantly more than 5.8 at αα = 0.05, so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population mean number of accidents per year at intersections with cameras installed is more than 5.8 accidents.The data suggest that the populaton mean is significantly more than 5.8 at αα = 0.05, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population mean number of accidents per year at intersections with cameras installed is more than 5.8 accidents.The data suggest that the sample mean is not significantly more than 5.8 at αα = 0.05, so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the sample mean number of accidents per year at intersections with cameras installed is more than 6 accidents.Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.If the population mean number of accidents per year at intersections with cameras installed is 5.8 and if another 48 intersections with cameras installed are observed then there would be a 2.51955457% chance that the sample mean for these 48 intersections with cameras installed would be greater than 6. There is a 2.51955457% chance of a Type I error.If the population mean number of accidents per year at intersections with cameras installed is 5.8 and if another 48 intersections with cameras installed are observed then there would be a 2.51955457% chance that the population mean number of accidents per year at intersections with cameras installed would be greater than 5.8.There is a 2.51955457% chance that the population mean number of accidents per year at intersections with cameras installed is greater than 5.8 .Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study.There is a 5% chance that you will get in a car accident, so please wear a seat belt.If the population mean number of accidents per year at intersections with cameras installed is 5.8 and if another 48 intersections with cameras installed are observed then there would be a 5% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the population mean number of accidents per year at intersections with cameras installed is more than 5.8.There is a 5% chance that the population mean number of accidents per year at intersections with cameras installed is more than 5.8.If the population population mean number of accidents per year at intersections with cameras installed is more than 5.8 and if another 48 intersections with cameras installed are observed then there would be a 5% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the population mean number of accidents per year at intersections with cameras installed is equal to 5.8.

Name: The average number of accidents at controlled intersections per year i
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T07:07:12.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: The average number of accidents at controlled intersections per year is 5.8. Is this average more for intersections with cameras installed? The 48 randomly observed intersections with cameras installed had an average of 6 accidents per year and the

Hey there! Thank you for posting the question. Since your question has more than 3 parts, we are…

Answered: The average number of accidents at…

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Topic Video

Question

The average number of accidents at controlled intersections per year is 5.8. Is this average more for intersections with cameras installed? The 48 randomly observed intersections with cameras installed had an average of 6 accidents per year and the standard deviation was 0.69. What can be concluded at the αα = 0.05 level of significance?

For this study, we should use
The null and alternative hypotheses would be:

H0:H0:

H1:H1:

The test statistic = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)
The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)
The p-value is αα
Based on this, we should the null hypothesis.
Thus, the final conclusion is that ...
- The data suggest that the population mean is not significantly more than 5.8 at αα = 0.05, so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population mean number of accidents per year at intersections with cameras installed is more than 5.8 accidents.
- The data suggest that the populaton mean is significantly more than 5.8 at αα = 0.05, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population mean number of accidents per year at intersections with cameras installed is more than 5.8 accidents.
- The data suggest that the sample mean is not significantly more than 5.8 at αα = 0.05, so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the sample mean number of accidents per year at intersections with cameras installed is more than 6 accidents.
Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.
- If the population mean number of accidents per year at intersections with cameras installed is 5.8 and if another 48 intersections with cameras installed are observed then there would be a 2.51955457% chance that the sample mean for these 48 intersections with cameras installed would be greater than 6.
- There is a 2.51955457% chance of a Type I error.
- If the population mean number of accidents per year at intersections with cameras installed is 5.8 and if another 48 intersections with cameras installed are observed then there would be a 2.51955457% chance that the population mean number of accidents per year at intersections with cameras installed would be greater than 5.8.
- There is a 2.51955457% chance that the population mean number of accidents per year at intersections with cameras installed is greater than 5.8 .
Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study.
- There is a 5% chance that you will get in a car accident, so please wear a seat belt.
- If the population mean number of accidents per year at intersections with cameras installed is 5.8 and if another 48 intersections with cameras installed are observed then there would be a 5% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the population mean number of accidents per year at intersections with cameras installed is more than 5.8.
- There is a 5% chance that the population mean number of accidents per year at intersections with cameras installed is more than 5.8.
- If the population population mean number of accidents per year at intersections with cameras installed is more than 5.8 and if another 48 intersections with cameras installed are observed then there would be a 5% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the population mean number of accidents per year at intersections with cameras installed is equal to 5.8.

Expert Solution

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 2 images

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Knowledge Booster

$Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals for Means$

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.