The accompanying Minitab regression output is based on data that appeared in the article "Application of Design of Experiments for Modeling Surface Roughness in Ultrasonic Vibration Turning."* The response variable is surface roughness (um), and the independent variables are vibration amplitude (um), depth of cut (mm), feed rate (mm/rev), and cutting speed (m/min), respectively. The regression equation is Ra- -0.972 - 0.0312a + 0.557d + 18.31 + 0.00282v Predictor Coef SE Coef ConaTADE 0723 0.3923 0.015

A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)
10th Edition
ISBN:9780134753119
Author:Sheldon Ross
Publisher:Sheldon Ross
Chapter1: Combinatorial Analysis
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1.1P: a. How many different 7-place license plates are possible if the first 2 places are for letters and...
icon
Related questions
Question
The accompanying Minitab regression output is based on data that appeared in the article "Application of Design of Experiments for Modeling Surface Roughness in Ultrasonic Vibration Turning."t The response variable is surface roughness (um), and the independent variables are vibration amplitude (um), depth of cut (mm), feed rate (mm/rev), and cutting speed
(m/min), respectively.
The regression equation is
Ra = -0.972 - 0.0312a + 0.557d + 18.3f + 0.00282v
Predictor
Coef
SE Coef
P
Constant
-0.9723
0.3923
-2.48
0.015
a
-0.03117
0.01864
-1.67
0.099
d.
0.5568
0.3185
1.75
0.084
18.2602
0.002822
R-Sq = 88.6%
f
0.7536
24.23
0.000
0.003977
0.71
0.480
S = 0.822059
R-Sq (adj) = 88.0%
Source
DS
MS
Regression
4
401.02
100.25
148.35
0.000
Residual Error
76
51.36
0.68
Total
80
452.38
Transcribed Image Text:The accompanying Minitab regression output is based on data that appeared in the article "Application of Design of Experiments for Modeling Surface Roughness in Ultrasonic Vibration Turning."t The response variable is surface roughness (um), and the independent variables are vibration amplitude (um), depth of cut (mm), feed rate (mm/rev), and cutting speed (m/min), respectively. The regression equation is Ra = -0.972 - 0.0312a + 0.557d + 18.3f + 0.00282v Predictor Coef SE Coef P Constant -0.9723 0.3923 -2.48 0.015 a -0.03117 0.01864 -1.67 0.099 d. 0.5568 0.3185 1.75 0.084 18.2602 0.002822 R-Sq = 88.6% f 0.7536 24.23 0.000 0.003977 0.71 0.480 S = 0.822059 R-Sq (adj) = 88.0% Source DS MS Regression 4 401.02 100.25 148.35 0.000 Residual Error 76 51.36 0.68 Total 80 452.38
(d) Interpret the number 18.2602 that appears in the Coef column.
O This is the coefficient on v, after adjusting for the effects of the other variables, a 1 m/min increase in cutting speed is associated with an estimated decrease of 18.2602 um in expected surface roughness.
O This is the coefficient on d, after adjusting for the effects of the other variables, a 1 mm increase in depth of cut is associated with an estimated increase of 18.2602 um in expected surface roughness.
O This is the coefficient of the constant, after adjusting for the effects of the other variables, a 1 µm increase in feed rate is associated with an estimated increase of 18.2602 pm in expected surface roughness.
O This is the coefficient on a, after adjusting for the effects of the other variables, a 1 µm increase
vibration amplitude is associated with an estimated decrease of 18.2602 um in expected surface roughness.
O This is the coefficient on f, after adjusting for the effects of the other variables, a 1 mm/rev increase in feed rate
associated with an estimated increase of 18.2602 um in expected surface roughness.
(e) At significance level 0.10, can any single one of the predictors be eliminated from the model provided that all of the other predictors are retained? (Select all that apply.)
O vibration amplitude
O depth of cut
O feed rate
O cutting speed
O surface roughness
(f) The estimated SD of Y when the values of the four predictors are 10, 0.5, 0.25, and 50, respectively, is 0.1174. Calculate both a 95% CI for true average roughness and a 95% PI for the roughness of a single specimen. (Round your answers to two decimal places.)
confidence interval
Um
prediction interval
|Um
Compare these two intervals.
O The prediction interval is the same width as the confidence interval.
O The prediction interval is much wider than the the confidence interval.
O The prediction interval is much narrower than the the confidence interval.
Transcribed Image Text:(d) Interpret the number 18.2602 that appears in the Coef column. O This is the coefficient on v, after adjusting for the effects of the other variables, a 1 m/min increase in cutting speed is associated with an estimated decrease of 18.2602 um in expected surface roughness. O This is the coefficient on d, after adjusting for the effects of the other variables, a 1 mm increase in depth of cut is associated with an estimated increase of 18.2602 um in expected surface roughness. O This is the coefficient of the constant, after adjusting for the effects of the other variables, a 1 µm increase in feed rate is associated with an estimated increase of 18.2602 pm in expected surface roughness. O This is the coefficient on a, after adjusting for the effects of the other variables, a 1 µm increase vibration amplitude is associated with an estimated decrease of 18.2602 um in expected surface roughness. O This is the coefficient on f, after adjusting for the effects of the other variables, a 1 mm/rev increase in feed rate associated with an estimated increase of 18.2602 um in expected surface roughness. (e) At significance level 0.10, can any single one of the predictors be eliminated from the model provided that all of the other predictors are retained? (Select all that apply.) O vibration amplitude O depth of cut O feed rate O cutting speed O surface roughness (f) The estimated SD of Y when the values of the four predictors are 10, 0.5, 0.25, and 50, respectively, is 0.1174. Calculate both a 95% CI for true average roughness and a 95% PI for the roughness of a single specimen. (Round your answers to two decimal places.) confidence interval Um prediction interval |Um Compare these two intervals. O The prediction interval is the same width as the confidence interval. O The prediction interval is much wider than the the confidence interval. O The prediction interval is much narrower than the the confidence interval.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)
A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)
Probability
ISBN:
9780134753119
Author:
Sheldon Ross
Publisher:
PEARSON
A First Course in Probability
A First Course in Probability
Probability
ISBN:
9780321794772
Author:
Sheldon Ross
Publisher:
PEARSON