Suppose Toyota and Honda must decide whether to make a new breed of side-impact airbags standard equipment on all models. Side-impact airbags raise the price of each automobile by $1,000. If both firms make side-impact airbags standard equipment, each company will earn profits of $1.6 billion. If neither company adopts the side-impact airbag technology, each company will earn $0.6 billion. If one company adopts the technology as standard equipment and the other does not, the adopting company will earn a profit of $2.5 billion and the other company will earn $ 0.8 billion. If you were a decision maker at Honda, would you make side-impact airbags standard equipment? O No O There is not enough information to answer the question. O Yes 4 If Toyota and Honda were able to cooperate, would you expect this same outcome? O No O There is not enough information to answer the question. O Yes

Suppose Toyota and Honda must decide whether to make a new breed of side-impact airbags standard equipment on all models. Side-impact airbags raise the price of each automobile by $1,000. If both firms make side-impact airbags standard equipment, each company will earn profits of $1.6 billion. If neither company adopts the side-impact airbag technology, each company will earn $0.6 billion. If one company adopts the technology as standard equipment and the other does not, the adopting company will earn a profit of $2.5 billion and the other company will earn $ 0.8 billion. If you were a decision maker at Honda, would you make side-impact airbags standard equipment? O No O There is not enough information to answer the question. O Yes 4 If Toyota and Honda were able to cooperate, would you expect this same outcome? O No O There is not enough information to answer the question. O Yes

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

While there is a degree of differentiation between major grocery chains like Albertsons and Kroger, the regular offering of sale prices by both firms for many of their products provides evidence that these firms engage in price competition. For markets where Albertsons and Kroger are the dominant grocers, this suggests that these two stores similtaneously announce one of two prices for a given product: a regular price or a sale price. Suppose that when one firm announces the sale price and the other annoucements the regular price for a particular product, the firm announcing the sale price attracts 1,000 extra customers to earn a profit of $5,000, compared to the $3,000 earned by the firm announcing the regular price. When both firms announce the sale price, the two firms split the market equally (each getting an extrs 500 customers) to earn profits of $2,000 each. When both firms announce the regular price, each company attracts only its 1,500 loyal customers and the firms each earn…
Using a payoff matrix/table to determine the equilibrium outcome Suppose there are only two firms that sell smartphones, Flashfone and Pictech. The following payoff matrix/table shows the profit (in millions of dollars) each company will earn, depending on whether it sets a high or low price for its phones. Pictech Pricing High Low Flashfone Pricing High 10, 10 4, 12 Low 12, 4 9, 9 For example, the lower left cell shows that if Flashfone prices low and Pictech prices high, Flashfone will earn a profit of $12 million and Pictech will earn a profit of $4 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Flashfone and Pictech are both profit-maximizing firms. If Flashfone prices high, Pictech will make more profit if it chooses a price, and if Flashfone prices low, Pictech will make more profit if it chooses a price. If Pictech prices high, Flashfone will make more profit if it chooses a price, and if Pictech prices low, Flashfone will make…
Janeek and Raj are the only two growers who provide organically grown com to a local grocery store. They know that if they cooperated and produced less com, they could raise the price of the corn. If they work independently, they will each earn $100. If they decide to work together and both lower their output, they can each earn $150. if one person lowers output and the other does not, the person who lowers output will earn $0 and the other person will capture the entire market and will earn $200. Reference the game illustrated below where the first payout in each cell is for Janeek and the second is for Raj. (J.R) Independent Cooperate Independent ($100, $100) ($0, $200) What is the Nash Equilibrium for this game? Ⓒ(Cooperate, Cooperate) (Cooperate, Independent) (Independent, Cooperate) (Independent, Independent) Cooperate ($200, 50) ($150, $150)
Suppose that two clothing manufacturers, Lands’ End and L.L. Bean, are deciding what price to charge for very similar field coats. The cost of producing these coats is $100. The coats are very close substitutes, so customers flock to the seller that offers the lowest price. If both firms offer identical prices, each receives half the customers. For simplicity, assume that the two firms have the choice of pricing at prices of $103, $102, or $101. The profit each firm would earn at various prices (Lands’ Ends Profit, LL Bean’s Profit) is attached in the payoff matrix below: a.) What is the Nash equilibrium and expected profits to LL Bean and Lands’ End of this game? b.) Suppose this is a mixed strategy game in which LL Bean has a 25% percent chance of choosing a priceof $101, a 25% chance of choosing price of $102, and a 50% chance of choosing $103, while Lands End has a1/3 chance of choosing each strategy. What’s the expected payoff to LL Bean? c.) Suppose that in hopes of raising…
Mays and McCovey are beer-brewing companies that operate in a duopoly (two-firm oligopoly). The daily marginal cost (MC) of producing a can of beer is constant and equals $0.60 per can. Assume that neither firm had any startup costs, so marginal cost equals average total cost (ATC) for each firm. Suppose that Mays and McCovey form a cartel, and the firms divide the output evenly. (Note: This is only for convenience; nothing in this model requires that the two companies must equally share the output.) Place the black point (plus symbol) on the following graph to indicate the profit-maximizing price and combined quantity of output if Mays and McCovey choose to work together. 1.00 Demand 0.90 Monopoly Outcome 0.80 0.70 MC = ATC 0.60 0.50 + 0.40 0.30 0.20 + 0.10 MR 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 QUANTITY (Cans of beer) PRICE (Dollars per can)
Suppose that Creamland and Dairy King are the only two firms that sell ice cream. The following payoff matrix shows the profit (in millions of dollars) each company will earn depending on whether or not it advertises: Dairy King Advertise Doesn't Advertise Advertise 8, 8 15, 2 Creamland Doesn't Advertise 2, 15 11, 11 For example, the upper right cell shows that if Creamland advertises and Dairy King doesn't advertise, Creamland will make a profit of $15 million, and Dairy King will make a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Creamland and Dairy King are both profit- maximizing firms. If Creamland decides to advertise, it will earn a profit of s million if Dairy King advertises and a profit of $ million if Dairy King does not advertise. If Creamland decides not to advertise, it will earn a profit of s million if Dairy King advertises and a profit of s million if Dairy King does not advertise. If Dairy King advertises, Creamland makes a higher profit if it…
Consider two cigarette companies, PM Inc. and Brown Inc. If neither company advertises, the two companies split the market. If they both advertise, they again split the market, but profits are lower, since each company must bear the cost of advertising. Yet if one company advertises while the other does not, the one that advertises attracts customers from the other. Refer to Scenario 17-3. What is PM Inc.'s dominant strategy? to advertise only if Brown Inc. does not advertise to refrain from advertising, regardless of whether Brown Inc. advertises to advertise, regardless of whether Brown Inc. advertises to advertise only if Brown Inc. advertises
To advertise or not to advertise Suppose that Creamland and Dairy King are the only two firms that sell ice cream. The following payoff matrix shows the profit (in millions of dollars) each company will earn depending on whether or not it advertises: Dairy King Advertise Doesn't Advertise Creamland Advertise 10, 10 18, 2 Doesn't Advertise 2, 18 11, 11 For example, the upper right cell shows that if Creamland advertises and Dairy King doesn't advertise, Creamland will make a profit of $18 million, and Dairy King will make a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Creamland and Dairy King are both profit-maximizing firms. If Creamland decides to advertise, it will earn a profit of _________ million if Dairy King advertises and a profit of ________ million if Dairy King does not advertise. If Creamland decides not to advertise, it will earn a profit of __________ million if Dairy King advertises and a profit of _________…
Suppose that GE is trying to prevent Maytag from entering the market for high efficiency clothes dryers. Even though high efficiency dryers are more costly to produce, they are also more profitable as they command sufficiently higher prices from consumers. The following payoffs table shows the annual profits for GE and Maytag for the advertising spending and entry decisions that they are facing. GE MAYTAG Advertising = $12m Advertising = $0.7m Stay Out $0, $30m $0, $35m Enter $1m , $20m $12m, $15 Based on this information, can GE successfully prevent Maytag from entering this market by increasing its advertising levels? What is the equilibrium outcome in this game? Suppose that an analyst at GE is convinced that just a little bit more advertising by GE, say another $2m, would be sufficient to deter enough customers from buying Maytag, thus, yield less than $0 profits for Maytag in the event it enters. Suppose that spending an extra $2m on advertising…
Consider a duopoly that compete with prices in a given market (parameter a>0 measures the market size) with two horizontally differentiated products. Firm 1 is the efficient firm with zero marginal cost while firm 2 is less efficient and has marginal cost c>0. Suppose a>c>(3/4)a>0. The two firms compete in prices in a second stage like in a Bertrand model with differentiated products. In a first stage firms choose simultaneously whether to play "early" denoted E or to play "late" denoted L. If they both make the same choice (either E or L), a simultaneous Bertrand game follows while if they make different choices, a sequential game follows with the firm having chosen E being the leader. The second stage subgame equilibrium profits are reported in the normal form first stage game below where the top payoff in any cell corresponds to the payoff of the row player (firm 1) while the bottom corresponds to the column player (firm 2). E1 and L1 correspond to the choices for Firm1 while E2 and…