Suppose the European Union (EU) was investigated and proposed a merger between two of the largest distillers of premium Scotch liquor. Based on some economists' definition of the relevant market, the two firms proposing to merge enjoyed a combined market share of about two-thirds, while another firm essentially controlled the remaining share of the market. Additionally, suppose that the (wholesale) market elasticity of demand for Scotch liquor is -1.4 and that it costs $15.90 to produce and distribute each liter of Scotch. Based only on these data, provide quantitative estimates of the likely pre- and postmerger prices in the wholesale market for premium Scotch liquor. Instructions: Do not round intermediate calculations. Enter your final responses rounded to the nearest penny (two decimal places). Pre-merger price: $ Post-merger price: $

Suppose the European Union (EU) was investigated and proposed a merger between two of the largest distillers of premium Scotch liquor. Based on some economists' definition of the relevant market, the two firms proposing to merge enjoyed a combined market share of about two-thirds, while another firm essentially controlled the remaining share of the market. Additionally, suppose that the (wholesale) market elasticity of demand for Scotch liquor is -1.4 and that it costs $15.90 to produce and distribute each liter of Scotch. Based only on these data, provide quantitative estimates of the likely pre- and postmerger prices in the wholesale market for premium Scotch liquor. Instructions: Do not round intermediate calculations. Enter your final responses rounded to the nearest penny (two decimal places). Pre-merger price: $ Post-merger price: $

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The cost function for producing ethanol from municipal waste (wastehol) is 1000+10q2 where q is in millions/gallons per year. The demand for wastehol is currently perfectly inelastic at 5 million gallons per year. Assume that producers of wastehol are perfectly competitive. California is deciding whether to convert all wastehol producers into a regulated wastehol utility. If wastehol is a regulated monopoly utility with the cost function above, what price would regulators set as the price of wastehol? Now assume that the wasteahol market has boomed and demand has grown to 20 (again million gallons per year). Now what is the regulated price of wastehol? You are the wastehol producer and are trying to decide whther to lobby for deregulating the wastehol industry. If wastehol were deregulated, if demand remains 20, what would the perfectly competitive price be? If you are a wastehol customer, you would prefer a deregulated industry if demand were 20? True/False?
You are managing a firm with market power, and you think the price elasticity of demand for your product is between 1.3 and 1.5. You estimate that your marginal cost is between $55 and $70. The price that you should set would range between $ and $. (Round your answers to two decimal places.) If you refine your estimate of the marginal cost to $80, the price you should set would now range between $ and $ (Round your answers to two decimal places.)
Q2: Firms A and B are two firms supplying products in two separate differentiated goods markets. Equations (1) and (2) give the total cost functions of the two firms: - Firm A: TC = 2Q -----------------------------(1) - Firm B TC = 10 + 2Q -------------------------(2) Each firm has the ability to produce a maximum quantity of 80,000 units in ten batches of 8,000. a) Use the information given about firms A and B and appropriate diagrams/figures to explain how the equilibrium for both firms will change if a rival company increases its prices.
A fried chicken franchise finds that the demand equation for its new roast chicken product, "Roasted Rooster," is given by 40 p0.6 where p is the price (in dollars) per quarter-chicken serving and q is the number of quarter-chicken servings that can be sold per hour at this price. Find E(p) E(p) = q= X Find the price elasticity of demand when the price is set at $3.70 per serving. At a price of $3.70, a 1% increase in price leads to a Interpret the result. At a price of $3.70, the demand is elastic They should raise X% decrease in demand. ✓X the price per serving in order to increase revenue.
Suppose the European Union (EU) was investigated and proposed a merger between two of the largest distillers of premium Scotch liquor. Based on some economists’ definition of the relevant market, the two firms proposing to merge enjoyed a combined market share of about two-thirds, while another firm essentially controlled the remaining share of the market. Additionally, suppose that the (wholesale) market elasticity of demand for Scotch liquor is −1.4 and that it costs $15.90 to produce and distribute each liter of Scotch. Based only on these data, provide quantitative estimates of the likely pre- and postmerger prices in the wholesale market for premium Scotch liquor. Instructions: Do not round intermediate calculations. Enter your final responses rounded to the nearest penny (two decimal places). Pre-merger price: $ Post-merger price: $
Le Jouet is a French firm, and it is the only seller of toy trains in France and Russia. Suppose that when the price of toy trains increases, Russian children more readily replace them with toy airplanes than French children. Thus, the demand for toy trains in Russia is more elastic than in France. The following graphs show the demand curves for toy trains in France (Dr) and Russia (DR) and marginal revenue curves in France (MRF) and Russia (MRR). Le Jouet's marginal cost of production (MC), depicted as the grey horizontal line in both graphs, is $12, and the resale of toy trains from Russia to France is prohibited. Assume there are no fixed costs in production, so marginal cost equals average total cost (ATC). PRICE (Dollars per toy train) 40 36 32 28 Total 24 20 16 12 8 4 0 Country France Russia France MR Price (Dollars per toy train) 20 20 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 QUANTITY (Millions of toy trains) N/A O True MC-ATC OF O False N/A (?) Single Price Quantity Sold (Millions of toy…
Suppose 4Sisters is a patented vaccine. Her producer is facing a linear demand function for 4Sisters. She manufactures at a constant marginal cost of $20. Reports indicate that she produces 12,000 units of vaccine. She charges a unit price of $400. She is making a positive economic profit of $1,500,000. Draw a well-labelled diagram to indicate the output decision, pricing decision, economic profit, and the resultant deadweight loss in the market for 4Sisters. Indicate key figures with reference to the above given information.
1. Consider the (inverse) market demand function for the market in streaming services. P = 120 - 4Q Assume further that the available technology results in Marginal Cost equal to $40. a) Graphically show the market outcome for monopoly, Cournot oligopoly and perfect competition. b) For monopoly, Cournot duopoly and perfect competition determine the optimal outcome. Clearly explain how you arrive at your answer. What are the market price and quantity under each market structure? c) What are the consumer surplus, producer surplus and total surplus under each scenario? d) Show the reaction function under Bertrand competition. What are the associated price and quantity?
Answer choices are first blank: negative, positive, zero second blank: an equal number of, fewer, more
show all working.
am. 114.
a) A Dutch Brewing company produces Heineken beer, assume further that the marginal cost of producing a six pack of Heineken Beer is $6. Dutch Brewing company sells Heineken in two different Markets namely Africa and Europe whose inverse demand functions are ?? = 24 − ??and ?? = 12 − 0.5?? respectively.Requireda) Calculate the profit maximising Price-Quantity combinations in these two markets Africa and Europe.b) With this Pricing strategy calculate the profit. c) If competitive output (P=MC=6) for Africa is 18 and Europe is 12, Compute the deadweight losses in the two markets. d) Clearly illustrates that the third degree price discrimination is welfare improving over a single price policy. e) Suppose these markets were no longer separated. How would you construct the market demand in this situation? Would the monopolist’s profit-maximizing single price still be 15?