Suppose that both firms start off not advertising. If the firms act independently, what strategies will they end up choosing?Fizzo will choose to advertise and Pop Hop will choose not to advertise.Both firms will choose not to advertise.Both firms will choose to advertise.Fizzo will choose not to advertise and Pop Hop will choose to advertise.Again, suppose that both firms start off not advertising. If the firms decide to collude, what strategies will they end up choosing?Both firms will choose to advertise.Fizzo will choose to advertise and Pop Hop will choose not to advertise.Fizzo will choose not to advertise and Pop Hop will choose to advertise.Both firms will choose not to advertise. 5. To advertise or not to advertiseSuppose that Fizzo and Pop Hop are the only two firms that sell orange soda. The following payoff matrix shows the profit (in millions of dollars) eachcompany will earn depending on whether or not it advertises:Рop HopAdvertise Doesn't AdvertiseAdvertise10, 1018, 2FizzoDoesn't Advertise2, 1811, 11For example, the upper right cell shows that if Fizzo advertises and Pop Hop doesn't advertise, Fizzo will make a profit of $18 million, and Pop Hop willmake a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Fizzo and Pop Hop are both profit-maximizing firms.If Fizzo decides to advertise, it will earn a profit of $million if Pop Hop advertises and a profit of $million if Pop Hop does notadvertise.If Fizzo decides not to advertise, it will earn a profit of Smillion if Pop Hop advertises and a profit of $million if Pop Hop does notadvertise.If Pop Hop advertises, Fizzo makes a higher profit if it choosesIf Pop Hop doesn't advertise, Fizzo makes a higher profit if it chooses

Nash equilibrium is an idea inside game hypothesis where the ideal result of a game is the place…

Suppose that both firms start off not advertising. If the firms act independently, what strategies will they end up choosing? O Fizzo will choose to advertise and Pop Hop will choose not to advertise. Both firms will choose not to advertise. O Both firms will choose to advertise. Fizzo will choose not to advertise and Pop Hop will choose to advertise. Again, suppose that both firms start off not advertising. If the firms decide to collude, what strategies will they end up choosing? Both firms will choose to advertise. O Fizzo will choose to advertise and Pop Hop will choose not to advertise.

Suppose that both firms start off not advertising. If the firms act independently, what strategies will they end up choosing? O Fizzo will choose to advertise and Pop Hop will choose not to advertise. Both firms will choose not to advertise. O Both firms will choose to advertise. Fizzo will choose not to advertise and Pop Hop will choose to advertise. Again, suppose that both firms start off not advertising. If the firms decide to collude, what strategies will they end up choosing? Both firms will choose to advertise. O Fizzo will choose to advertise and Pop Hop will choose not to advertise.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Provide a real -world example of a market that approximates each oligopoly setting, and explain your reasoninge) Cournot oligopoly modelf) Stackelberg oligopoly modelg) Bertrand oligopoly model
If two businesses are selling the same good or service, who would benefit if theycooperated on pricing? Who would benefit if they competed based on pricing?
Consider a oligopoly with two firms. Each firm has constant marginal cost of 3 dollar per unit and zero fixed costs. Suppose the market demand curve is P = 15-Q, where Q=Q1+Q2 is the sum of the quantities produced by both firms. Suppose each firm can produce either 1, 2, 3, or 4 units. Which of the following is an optimal collusive outcome for the firms? O Each firm produces 2 units. Each firm produces 4 units. O Each firm produces 3 units. O Each firm produces 1 unit.
F16
Scenario: Madison Company is a large manufacturer and distributor of cake supplies. It is based in Chicago(Headquarters) and Trinidad. It sends supplies to firms throughout the United States and the UnitedKingdom. It markets its supplies through periodic mass mailings of catalogs to those firms. Itsclients can make orders over the phone and Madison ships the supplies upon demand.The main competition for Madison’s in the United States comes from one U.S. firm and oneCanadian firm. A British firm has a small share of the U.S. market but is at a disadvantagebecause of its distance. The British firm’s marketing and transportation costs in the U.S. marketare relatively high. Given that one-third of the company sales are exported to the United Kingdom and invoices forexports are in US dollars, the demand for its exports is highly sensitive to the value of the Britishpound. In order to maintain its inventory at a proper level, it must forecast the total demand for itsproducts which is…
Please no written by hand solution Suppose two firms compete in quantities (Cournot). Market demand is given by P = 260 − 2Q, where Q = q1 + q2. Both firms have constant MC = AT C = 20.a. Solve for the Cournot equilibrium and find the Cournot equilibrium profits for each firm.b. Now suppose the two firms formed a cartel. What would be the profits for each firm then?c. If firm 2 sticks to the cartel agreement (quantity), then what is the best response for firm 1 (if firm 1 were to deviate)? Find the profits for firm 1 from deviating.d. How large must the probability-adjusted discount factor be in order for the cartel to be stable?e. How would the answer to part d. change if the two firms were competing in prices (Bertrand)?Please answer all steps, because no too much detailed answers required.
According to the kinked demand curve theory of oligopoly each firm thinks its demand curve at prices above the existing price is a. less elastic than at prices below the exisiting price since price increases will be matched. b. more elastic than at prices below the exisiting price since price increases will be matched. c. less elastic than at prices below the exisiting price since price increases will not be matched. d. more elastic than at prices below the exisiting price since price increases will not be matched.
help please answer in text form with proper workings and explanation for each and every part and steps with concept and introduction no AI no copy paste remember answer must be in proper format with all working
Assume that the market for oil is made up of two firms: Exxon Mobil and Chevron. Also assume that New England has dozens of breweries and each of these make beers with different tastes, colors, and aromas. Which of the following statements is true? The market structure for oil is an oligopoly, and the one for beer is monopolistic competition. The market structure for oil is monopolistic competition, and the one for beer is an oligopoly. The market structure for both oil and beer is an oligopoly. The market structure for both oil and beer is monopolistic competition.
. What is the Nash equilibrium in this advertising war?a) Coke advertises; Pepsi does not advertise b) Pepsi advertises; Coke does not advertise c) neither of them advertises d) both of them advertise Explain the reasons for your answer? Was any other equilibrium position possible? advertise do not advertise pepsi-advertise coke profit=$50B coke profit =$20B PEPSI profit =$50B pepsi profit =$100B do not advertise coke profit =$100B coke profit =$80B pepsi profit =$20B PEPSI PROFIT =$80 B
In 2018, Delta Air Lines said that it was increasing its fares by 4% because its fuel bill jumped by 33% from the previous yoar. Other airines also announced fare increases. Assuming that these firms are oligopolistic and the outcome is a Nash-Coumot equilibrium, why did the prices rise less than in proportion to the firms' cost? Price rose less than the firms' costs in this oligopoly because O A. demand is not perfectly inelastic. O B. consumers are not price sensitive. OC. the firms are price takers. D. air travel has no close substitutes.
2. Consider the following game: Soapy Inc. and Suddies Inc. are the only producers of soap powder. They collude and agree to share the market equally. If neither firm cheats on the agreement, each makes $1 million profit. If either firm cheats, the cheat makes a profit of $1.5 million, while the complier incurs a loss of $0.5 million. If both cheat, they break even. Neither firm can monitor the other's actions. a) Construct the payoff matrix. b) What is the dominant strategy? c) What is the nash equilibrium for this game?