Suppose it is known that in a certain community 30% of the household have a micro-wave oven. if we select a simple random sample of 19 households from this population, how many would we expect to have mirco-waves ovens?

Suppose it is known that in a certain community 30% of the household have a micro-wave oven. if we select a simple random sample of 19 households from this population, how many would we expect to have mirco-waves ovens?

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The U.S. Energy Information Administration claimed that U.S. residential customers used an average of 10,069 kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity this year. A local power company believes that residents in their area use more electricity on average than EIA's reported average. To test their claim, the company chooses a random sample of 171 of their customers and calculates that these customers used an average of 10,461 kWh of electricity last year. Assuming that the population standard deviation is 2973 kWh, is there sufficient evidence to support the power company's claim at the 0.01 level of significance? Step 3 of 3: Draw a conclusion and interpret the decision.
The U.S. Energy Information Administration claimed that U.S. residential customers used an average of 10,941 kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity this year. A local power company believes that residents in their area use more electricity on average than EIA's reported average. To test their claim, the company chooses a random sample of 115 of their customers and calculates that these customers used an average of 11,425 kWh of electricity last year. Assuming that the population standard deviation is 3217 kWh, is there sufficient evidence to support the power company's claim at the 0.02 level of significance? Step 3 of 3: Draw a conclusion and interpret the decision.
The U.S. Energy Information Administration claimed that U.S. residential customers used an average of 10,069 kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity this year. A local power company believes that residents in their area use more electricity on average than EIA's reported average. To test their claim, the company chooses a random sample of 171 of their customers and calculates that these customers used an average of 10,461 kWh of electricity last year. Assuming that the population standard deviation is 2973 kWh, is there sufficient evidence to support the power company's claim at the 0.01 level of significance? Step 2 of 3: Compute the value of the test statistic. Round your answer to two decimal places.
The U.S. Energy Information Administration claimed that U.S. residential customers used an average of 10,95110,951 kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity this year. A local power company believes that residents in their area use more electricity on average than EIA's reported average. To test their claim, the company chooses a random sample of 184184 of their customers and calculates that these customers used an average of 11,162kWh11,162⁢kWh of electricity last year. Assuming that the population standard deviation is 1263kWh1263⁢kWh, is there sufficient evidence to support the power company's claim at the 0.050.05 level of significance? Step 2 of 3 : Compute the value of the test statistic. Round your answer to two decimal places.
According to the 2000 U.S. Census Bureau, in 2000, 9.5 percent of children in the state of Ohio were not covered by private or government health insurance. In the neighboring state of Pennsylvania, 4.9 percent of children were not covered by health insurance. Assume that these proportions are parameters for the child populations of the respective states. If a random sample of size 100 children is drawn from the Ohio population, and an independent random sample of size 120 is drawn from the Pennsylvania population, what is the probability that the samples would yield a difference, ^p1 - ^p2 of .09 or more?
Each scenario shows the data used for a randomisation test on a difference in two proportions. Both have a sample size of n = 30, with half being assigned to Treatment A and half to Treatment B. Scenario 1 has a difference in proportions of 0.4. Scenario 2 has a difference in proportions of 0.2. If we ran a randomisation test for each scenario, the one that would result in a smaller tail proportion in the resulting re-randomisation distribution is: Scenario 2 Scenario 1 Data Yes Yes Data Yes Yes 01 4 LO 5 02 7 No 03 No 0.2 11 →No 05 11 0.4 06 0.7 10 67 8 No DO 4 09 B B 10
were Classified 2. Pg, 36-7, 1.4.33. At the beginning of a Study individuals, 3% were Classified as heavy Smokers, 25.1. Smokers, and 72% were classified as as light In the 5 year study, it was determined. that the death rates of the heavy and light Smokers were 6 and 3 times that of non smokers. non- of Smokers, respectively. A randomly selected Participant died over the Syear period: Calculate the probability that the participant а nonsmorcer? was
A cat-lover claims that cats are just as smart as dogs. In order to back this claim up with some evidence she organizes a study at a large local pet daycare center. A random sample of 40 cats are selected and a random sample of 40 dogs are selected. Each of the selected animals is given one hour with a trainer in which the trainer attempts to teach them to roll over. Upon conclusion of the training, the proportion of dogs and proportion of cats that have learned this skill is computed. The trainer reports that she is 90% confident that the true difference in the proportion of all dogs and all cats (pD – pC) that can learn this skill with one hour of training is between –0.05 to 0.28. Which of the following conclusions can be made based upon this confidence interval? (A) Because most of the values in the confidence interval are positive, this proves that dogs are smarter than cats. (B) Because the point estimate of the confidence interval is positive, there is convincing evidence…
Suppose we are developing a new drug that is supposed to improve the recovery time of an illness. We want to investigate if this is true. We conduct an experiment: we randomize twenty participants into two groups of size n = 10 each. In one group, we give the participants the drug. In the other group, we give them a placebo. We measure the recovery time of the participants in days. We observe the following data: • In the group given the drug, we observe recovery times (yı,..., Y10) = (15, 10, 13, 7,9, 8, 21,9, 14, 8), with ĝ1 = 11.4. • In the group given the placebo, we observe recovery times (yı1,..., Y20) = (15, 14, 12, 8, 14, 7, 16, 10, 15, 12) with j2 = 12.3. Assume that the data in each group follow Normal(µ1,0²) and Normal(42, o²) distributions respec- tively for the drug and placebo groups, o2 15. We want to test the following hypothesis: Ho : µ1 – 12 = 0 versus HA: µ1 – 42 < 0, using the test statistic T(Y) = Y1 – Ý2. a) Define the rejection region as {y : ĝı – 2 < c1} where ci…
is described below. NOTE: If the method is experimental, indicate if it is a true experiment or quasi experiment. 1. I get 30 people and use random assignment to divide the people into two groups. One group reads an article about the statistics of injuries and deaths caused by people using smart phones while driving, the other group watches a short video about a person who killed someone while using their smart phone. Both groups are then monitored to see if either of these made a difference in how often these people use their smart phones use while behind the wheel. What method would that study be? 2. What method asks a series of questions that are all planned in advance?
A researcher is creating a new treatment protocol for Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS), a form of preleukemia. Following the old treatment protocol, 28% of patients with MDS will develop leukemia within 5 years of MDS diagnosis. He believes his new treatment protocol will lead to fewer MDS patients developing leukemia. He takes a random sample of 100 individuals on his new treatment protocol. Of these 100 individuals, 20 develop leukemia within 5 years of MDS diagnosis. Conduct a hypothesis test at the 10% level to test this claim that his new treatment protocol will lead to fewer MDS patients developing leukemia. What is the appropriate conclusion/interpretation for this hypothesis test? Write a few sentences.
2. Suppose AB Drug Company develops a new drug, designed to prevent colds. The company states that the drug is equally effective for men and women. To test this claim, they choose a simple random sample of 100 women and 160 men from a population of 100,000 volunteers. At the end of the study, 38% of the women caught a cold; and 51% of the men caught a cold. Based on these findings, can we reject the company's claim that the drug is equally effective for men and women? Use a = 0.05 level of significance.