Suppose Frankie is offered $300 today, or $330 a year from now, provided they are willing to wait.They have complete faith in the person making the offer (i.e. they believe that they will indeed bepaid $330 in the future if they wait). Economists:OOcan't predict what Frankie will do because people have different tendencies to discount the future.predict Frankie will take the $300 today.predict Frankie will wait for the $330 a year from now.think there is a 50/50 chance that Frankie will take the money today.

In economics the discount rate helps to determine the future monetary value in today's terms.

Suppose Frankie is offered $300 today, or $330 a year from now, provided they are willing to wait. They have complete faith in the person making the offer (i.e. they believe that they will indeed be paid $330 in the future if they wait). Economists: can't predict what Frankie will do because people have different tendencies to discount the future. O predict Frankie will take the $300 today. predict Frankie will wait for the $330 a year from now. think there is a 50/50 chance that Frankie will take the money today.

Suppose Frankie is offered $300 today, or $330 a year from now, provided they are willing to wait. They have complete faith in the person making the offer (i.e. they believe that they will indeed be paid $330 in the future if they wait). Economists: can't predict what Frankie will do because people have different tendencies to discount the future. O predict Frankie will take the $300 today. predict Frankie will wait for the $330 a year from now. think there is a 50/50 chance that Frankie will take the money today.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Please answer everything in the photo. Last question is asking if members of the population prefer or do not prefer to pay.
- 1 with Imagine that voters and politicians play the following game. A politician who is in office has to decide how much effort e to apply to affect the outcome of some policy. The policy output x has two states, indicated by xh = 1 or xi = 0 re- spectively. In particular, when the politician applies effort e, we have x = probability e and x = 0 with probability 1 e. Moreover, the politician dislikes applying effort, and faces a cost ce²/2. Before the the politician takes a decision, voters tell the politician that they will contribute h to the re-election campaign if x = 1 and if x 0. Finally, if the politician does not like the contract setup, he can walk away and just get some payoff m. = The timing of the game is as follows: 1) Voters offer a take-it-or-leave-it contract {h,1} and politicians choose to accept or not. If not, her outside option is m 2) politicians apply hidden effort e = [0,1] 3) x is realized 4) voters pays w(x) = h,1 and keep x - w(x) 5) payoffs are uv(x) = x =…
If the price of restaurant meals is overall higher in big cities then you might expect young people in those cities to spend more on those meals as a percent of their income than similar people in the suburbs. The answer must then lie with the preferences of those young people with their utility curves. Do you think that people reveal their preferences in part by where they choose to live?
Betty is looking for a job. She considers job opportunities intwo cities. Bettyís utility is given by y- x, where y is the lifetime income andx is the amount spent on buying a house. The income from City 1 fluctuatesalthough the house price is stable. On the contrary, the income from City2 is stable while the house price fluctuates. If she moves to City 1, Bettycan earn a lifetime income y1 with probability alpha and 1 + y1 with probability1-alpha . The house price in City 1 is x1. Moving to City 2 means that Bettycan earn an income of y2. However, the house price is x2 with probabilitygamma and 1 + x2 with probability 1-gamma . Do the following: (a) Write down theexpected utilities associated with living in the two respective cities, i.e., V1and V2. (b) Derive the condition under which Betty chooses City 1.
Madeleine is a high school graduate deciding whether to go to university. She (like everyone else) lives for two periods after high school. In the first period, she can work (without university) for a salary of YH, or she can attend university. If she attends university, she must pay $5000 in fees (tuition, books), but she will also earn $5000 from a sum- mer job. In the second period, she will continue to earn YH if she did not attend university, or she will earn YU if she went to university. The interest rate at which money can be borrowed or invested is r. Show that she will attend university if YU . (2 1 r)YH. Explain how an increase in the interest rate would affect her decision to attend university.
F.A. Hayek states that it is imperative for individuals to not only know the changes in prices, but the exact reasons for which those changes occur. Choose best option: True or False
Try to answer as soon as possible... I want to know how we solve this!!!
uppose that the salary range for recent college graduates with a bachelor's degree in economics is $30,000 to $50,000, with 25 percent of jobs offering $30,000 per year, 50 percent offering $40,000 per year and 25 percent offering $50,000 per year and that in all other respects, the jobs are equally satisfying. Assume that in this market, a job offer remains open for only a short time so that continuing to search requires an applicant to reject any current job offer. Moe has just received a job offer that pays $40,000 per year. Moe should: Select one: a. reject the offer regardless of his preference for risk. b. accept the offer if he is risk averse. c. reject the offer if he is risk averse. d. only accept the offer if he is risk-neutral.
Consider a game between player A with a choice between moves d₁ and d₂, and player B with a choice between 81 and 82, and the pay-offs given by: 3₁ Consider a zero-sum game with the following payoff matrix for player 1: 61 62 d₁ (4,6) (7,2) d₂ (2,8) (5,4) Is that game separable? a. Separable with r₁(d₁) = 5, r₁(d₂) = 2, 72(81) = 1, 72(82) = 4, (s₁ (d₁) = 2, 8₁ (d₂) = 4,82 (81) = 4, 82 (82) = 0 b. Separable with a different solution that the ones proposed c. Separable with r₁(d₁) = 3, r1(d₂) = 3,(61) = 0, 72(82) = 1, (81 (d₁) = 1, 81 (d₂) = 4, 82 (81) = 5, 82 (82) = 2 No, not separable. d. e. Separable with ri (d₁) = 4, r₁(d₂) = 1, r2(81) = -1, 72(82) = 2, (81 (d₁) = 1, 81 (d₂) = 4, 82 (81) = 6, 82 (8₂) = 1 f. Separable with r₁(d₁) = 4, r₁(d₂) = 2, 7₂(81) = 0,72(8₂) = 3, (s₁ (d₁) = 1, 8₁ (d₂) = 3, 82 (81) = 5, 82 (8₂) = 1 Consider the payoff matrix M for a zero-sum game as defined below: 81 82 d₁0-2 d₂-2-1 M1 M₂ M3 M4 M5 d₁ 0 1 5 6 8 d₂ 10 6 5 2 3 O a. r* = (1/2, 1/2), y* = (1/2, 1/2),…
3
Are the following preferences consistent with von Neumann Morgenstern’s axioms to maximize expected utility? Explain. a. You would rather have a sure $200 to a gamble with p=0.7 chance of $200, p=0.1 chance of $50, p=0.2 chance of $300. b. You prefer the gamble of p=2/3 chance of $300 and p=1/3 chance of $50 than a sure $250 win.
Also calculate monthly budget. Thanks!