Suppose economists observe that an increase in government spending of $14 billion raises the total demand for goods and services by $42 billion. If these economists ignore the possibility of crowding out, they would estimate the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) to be . Now suppose the economists allow for crowding out. Their new estimate of the MPC would be than their initial one.

Suppose economists observe that an increase in government spending of $14 billion raises the total demand for goods and services by $42 billion. If these economists ignore the possibility of crowding out, they would estimate the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) to be . Now suppose the economists allow for crowding out. Their new estimate of the MPC would be than their initial one.

Economics (MindTap Course List)

13th Edition

ISBN:9781337617383

Author:Roger A. Arnold

Publisher:Roger A. Arnold

Chapter18: Debates In Macroeconomics Over The Role And Effects Of Government

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5QP

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Q: Consider a hypothetical closed economy in which households spend $0.60 of each additional dollar…

A: Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) is the proportion of an increase in income that gets spent on…

Q: Suppose the following list of events describes all of the economic activity resulting from an…

A: Here we have to calculate the Saving and Consumtion Values at the MPC value of 0.67MPC: The MPC…

Q: Suppose actual real GDP is $13.19 trillion, potential real GDP is $12.96 trillion, the marginal…

A: Marginal Propensity to Consume(MPC): The marginal Propensity to Consume refers to the proportion of…

Q: Suppose economists observe that an increase in government spending of $11 billion raises the total…

A: Crowding Out Effect:In economics, the Crowding Out Effect means the situationwhere increased…

Q: Consider a simple model where consumption is C = c(Y-T), Y-T is disposable income, c is the marginal…

A: Fiscal multiplier (FM): It is the ratio of change in total output to change in taxes FM=∂Y∂T This…

Q: Suppose actual real GDP is $7.91 trillion, potential real GDP is $13.33 trillion, the marginal…

A: Marginal Propensity to Consume(MPC): The marginal Propensity to Consume refers to the proportion of…

Q: Suppose actual real GDP is $13.56 trillion, potential real GDP is $12.34 trillion, and the marginal…

A: Given Actual real GDP =$13.56 trillion Potential GDP =$12.34 trillion.Marginal propensity to consume…

Q: Suppose there is some hypothetical closed economy in which households spend $0.80 of each additional…

A: Aggregate demand is the total demand that is spent in the economy. It includes consumption,…

Q: An economy is operating with an output that is $400 billion dollars below its natural rate of $2000…

A: The economy’s current level of output is $1,600 billion (2,000 - $400) and the economy’s potential…

Q: Let the marginal propensity to consume for an economy be 0.9 (MPC = 0.9). Policymakers in the…

A: Given MPC = 0.9 MPS = 1 – MPC = 0.1 Spending multiplier = 1/MPS = 10 Government reduced spending =…

Q: a) Suppose economists observe that an increase in government spending of 300 crore taka raises the…

Q: Suppose the MPC is 0.60. Assume there are no crowding out or investment accelerator effects. Please…

A: Given, MPC = 0.60

Q: Suppose actual real GDP is $13.74 trillion, potential real GDP is $12.69 trillion, and the marginal…

A: Given Actual real GDP =$13.74 trillion Potential GDP =$12.69 trillion. Marginal propensity to…

Q: If the marginal propensity to consume equals 0.80, the tax rate equals 0.20, and the marginal…

A: Here we calculate the Government Purchase multiplier by using the given data , so calculation of the…

Q: Suppose that a certain country has an MPC of 0.9 and an equilibrium real GDP of $500 billion. If…

A: The Investment Multiplier proposes that the expansion in the Investments will prompt the income…

Q: Suppose economists observe that an increase in government spending of 700 crore taka that raises the…

A: Given : Increase in government spending = 700 crore taka Increase in aggregate demand = 900 crore…

Q: Why does a reduction in taxes have a smaller multiplier effect than an increase in government…

A: Multiplier is defined as the number which denotes a proportionate increase in income due to increase…

Q: Suppose the government reduces taxes by 50,000,000, that there is no crowding out, and that marginal…

A: Initially, due to the tax cut of 50,000,000 the spendings of people rose by the MPC (given as 0.9).…

Q: Why will a temporary tax increase be insignificant in reducing consumption expenditures by the…

A: Taxes are obligatory commitments that a government office, whether nearby, provincial, or…

Q: Suppose there is some hypothetical closed economy in which households spend $0.75 of each additional…

A: The spending multiplier refers to the factor by which a change in autonomous spending changes the…

Q: Given that the maginal propensity to consume (MPC) is 0.50, what is the change in equilibrium output…

Q: Imagine the government wants to conduct an expansionary fiscal policy and needs an expert to answer…

A: Marginal propensity to consume shows how consumption changes as income changes. It is the ratio of…

Q: Consider a hypothetical closed economy in which households spend $0.80 of each additional dollar…

A: Hello. Since your question has multiple parts, we will solve the first question for you. If you want…

Q: Consider an economy in which the marginal propensity to consume is 0.8 and GDP is currently at…

A: Given; Marginal Propensity to Consume= 0.8 Current GDP= 12000 Tax multiplier=-MPC1-MPCGovernment…

Q: Changes in taxes The following graph plots an aggregate demand curve. Using the graph, shift the…

A: Aggregate demand is the total demand of the goods and service in a year. It is the summation of…

Q: Suppose the following list of events describes all of the economic activity resulting from an…

A: Govеrnmеnt spеnding rеfеrs to the money spent using the general public sector on acquiring goods and…

Question

Suppose economists observe that an increase in government spending of $14 billion raises the total demand for goods and services by $42 billion.

If these economists ignore the possibility of crowding out, they would estimate the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) to be .

Now suppose the economists allow for crowding out.

Their new estimate of the MPC would be than their initial one.

Expert Solution

This question has been solved!

Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.

This is a popular solution!

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Step 1

VIEW

Step 2

VIEW

Step 3

VIEW

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 1 images

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Knowledge Booster

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.

Similar questions

Suppose the MPC is 0.60. Assume there are no crowding out or investment accelerator effects. Please answer the following questions with calculation details. (1) If the government increases expenditures by $200 billion, then by how much does aggregate demand shift to the right? (2) If the government decreases taxes by $200 billion, then by how much does aggregate demand shift to the right? (3) Are the above two results the same? Why or why not? Madhavi
3. a) Suppose economists observe that an increase in government spending of 300 crore taka raises the total demand for goods and services to 400 crore taka. If these economists ignore the possibility of crowding out effect, calculate the marginal propensity to consume (MPC)? b) Now suppose economists allow for crowding out. Would their new estimate of the MPC be smaller or larger than your answer to part a, explain.
Suppose actual real GDP is $13.56 trillion, potential real GDP is $12.34 trillion, and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.74. If we ignore price effects, and if the government already decided to increase its spending by $1.90 trillion, by how many trillions of dollars should the government change its lump sum taxes to fix the gap? (Round this to two digits after the decimal and enter this value as either a positive value or a negative value without the dollar sign.)
Consider a hypothetical closed economy in which households spend $0.80 of each additional dollar they earn and save the remaining $0.20. The marginal propensity to consume (MPC) for the economy is______, and the spending multiplier for the economy is______. suppose the government in this economy decides to decrease the government purchases by $300 billion. The decrease in government purchases will lead to a decrease in income generating an initial change in consumption equal to______. This decreases income yet again, causing a second change in consumption equal to_______. the total change in demand resulting from the initial change in government spending is_____________. The following graph shows that aggregate demand curve (AD1) for this economy before the change in government spending. Use the green line (triangle symbol) to plot the new aggregate demand curve (AD2) after the spending multiplier effect takes place. Hint: be sure that the new aggregate demand curve (AD2) is parallel…
The only fill in the blank options are Larger MPC or Smaller MPC
Suppose actual real GDP is $13.74 trillion, potential real GDP is $12.69 trillion, and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.6. If we ignore price effects, and if the government already decided to increase its spending by $1.61 trillion, by how many trillions of dollars should the government change its lump sum taxes to fix the gap? (Round this to two digits after the decimal and enter this value as either a positive value or a negative value without the dollar sign.) Correct Answer: 3.38 Please solve to get that same answer
Consider a simple model where consumption is C = c(Y-T), Y-T is disposable income, c is the marginal propensity to consume. Explain how a fiscal multiplier can arise. What things can reduce the size of the multiplier that you discussed.
Suppose there is some hypothetical closed economy in which households spend $0.75 of each additional dollar they earn and save the remaining $0.25. The marginal propensity to consume (MPC) for this economy is _____ , and the spending multiplier for this economy is _____ Suppose the government in this economy decides to decrease government purchases by $250 billion. The decrease in government spending will lead to a decrease in income, creating an initial change in consumption equal to $______ billion. This decreases income yet again, leading to a second change in consumption equal to $________ billion . The total change in demand resulting from the initial change in government spending is $ ________ trillion. The following graph shows the aggregate demand curve (AD1AD1) for this economy before the change in government spending. Use the green line (triangle symbol) to plot the new aggregate demand curve (AD2AD2) after the multiplier effect takes place. For simplicity,…
Let the marginal propensity to consume for an economy be 0.9 (MPC = 0.9). Policymakers in the federal government view the economy as "overheating" and want to enact fiscal policy to reduce AD. This scenario applies questions 31 - 33. Question 31 If the federal government reduces it purchases, G, by $50 billion, by much will real GDP change assuming no mitigating factors on the fiscal multiplier? Edit View Insert Format Tools Table 12pt v Paragraph v BIU A ...
Suppose that a certain country has an MPC of 0.9 and an equilibrium real GDP of $500 billion. If government decreases taxes by $4 billion, what will be its new equilibrium real GDP ? I thought the answer was $460 billion, but that was incorrect…
An economy is operating with an output that is $400 billion dollars below its natural rate of $2000 billion dollars and fiscal policy makers want to close the recessionary gap. The central bank agrees to hold the interest rate constant so there is no crowding out. The marginal propensity to consume is 4/5. In which direction and by how much would the government spending need to change to close the gap? Fully explain your answer and provide a graph that shows the initial situation
Suppose the following list of events describes all of the economic activity resulting from an increase in government spending. Suppose that at each step after the initial one, the marginal propensity to consume is 0.67 and the tax rate is 16%. Step 0. The government spends $8500 on meat to host a very large dinner for foreign diplomats. Step A. The butcher takes the income earned by selling the meat, saves some, and spends the rest on a wedding cake for his daughter. Step B. The baker who produced the wedding cake saves some of her earnings and uses the rest to purchase beautiful candlesticks as gifts for all of her friends. Step C. The local candlestick maker saves some of his revenue for retirement and spends the rest on building materials to improve his house. Instructions: Modify the settings in the interactive tool to represent this event. Then click "Spending Rounds" and use the table to answer the following questions. Round answers to the nearest cent, if necessary. How much…