Suppose Congress enacts a tax reform law, and the average federal tax rate drops from 30% to 10%. Researchers investigate the impact of the tax cut and find that the income subject to the tax increases from $600 billion to $700 billion. The theoretical explanation is that workers have increased their work effort in response to the incentive of lower taxes. On the following graph, use the green point (triangle symbol) to plot the point corresponding to the income of $600 billion. Then use the orange point (square symbol) to plot the point corresponding to the income of $700 billion. FEDERAL TAX REVENUE (Billions of dollars) 220 200 180 160 140 - 120 - 100 80 S 60 40 20 0 0 10 20 O True 30 40 50 60 70 80 FEDERAL TAX RATE (Percent) O False 90 Laffer Curve 100 110 A Income $800 O Income $700 True or False: The change in income is represented by a movement along the upward-sloping portion of the Laffer curve. (?)

Suppose Congress enacts a tax reform law, and the average federal tax rate drops from 30% to 10%. Researchers investigate the impact of the tax cut and find that the income subject to the tax increases from $600 billion to $700 billion. The theoretical explanation is that workers have increased their work effort in response to the incentive of lower taxes. On the following graph, use the green point (triangle symbol) to plot the point corresponding to the income of $600 billion. Then use the orange point (square symbol) to plot the point corresponding to the income of $700 billion. FEDERAL TAX REVENUE (Billions of dollars) 220 200 180 160 140 - 120 - 100 80 S 60 40 20 0 0 10 20 O True 30 40 50 60 70 80 FEDERAL TAX RATE (Percent) O False 90 Laffer Curve 100 110 A Income $800 O Income $700 True or False: The change in income is represented by a movement along the upward-sloping portion of the Laffer curve. (?)

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

E2
What is the difference between a negatively and positively sloped income-consumption curve?
Laffer curve In the 1980s, president Reagan based his tax and spending policies on supply side eonomics. The idea behind supply side economics is the marginal tax rate is so high it discourages work. Cutting the tax rate would end up increasing tax revenue. We develop a simple model of this idea to determine the restrictions on the utility function required to generate a Laffer curve. Let T denote the tax rate, w is the real wage rate and n the labor supply. The tax revenue is T=wnT where wn is labor income, which is the tax base. For convinience assume w is constant. There is no reason for this assumption to be true, but we impose it to focus on the restrictions on the utility function to generate the Laffer curve. As the tax rate T increases, workers substitute towards leisure and away from consumption. Hence as T rises, wn falls and tax revenues falls for high enough tax rates. Let U,V satisfy the standard assumptions. The model is static and households are endowed with one unit of…
Need help with this questions. Remember its all together as 1 question. Thank you!
Suppose that a country has only two commodities, two factors of production, and no savings. The two commodities are wine (W) and cheese (C) and the two factors of production are capital (K) and labour (L). The country collects the following partial factor taxes: tKC is a tax on capital used in the production of cheese equal to 20%. tKW is a tax on capital used in the production of wine equal to 25%. tLC is a tax on labour used in the production of cheese equal to 20%. tLW is a tax on labour used in the production of wine equal to 15%. Which of the following would have the same outcome as the above taxes? A) Replacing tKW and tKC with a 22.5% tax on capital. B) Replacing tKC and tLC with a 20% tax on cheese. C) Replacing tKW and tLW with a 20% tax on wine. D) Replacing tLW and tLC with a 17.5% tax on labour. E) All of the above. Please explain
The one-period model with quasi-linear utility predicts that a decrease in marginal income tax rates could increase tax collection if:Group of answer choices Substitution effects dominate income effects so that the percent change in taxes is greater than the percent change in GDP Substitution effects dominate income effects so that the percent change in taxes is less than the percent change in GDP Income effect dominate substitution effects so that the percent change in taxes is less than the percent change in GDP Income effects dominate substitution effects so that the percent change in taxes is greater than the percent change in GDP
Mark can work up to 80 hours each week at a pre-tax hourly wage of $20 but faces a constant 20 percent tax on his earnings. Thus, Mark maximizes his utility by choosing to work 50 hours per week. The government proposes a negative income tax whereby everyone is given $300 per week and anyone can supplement their income further by working. To pay for the negative income tax, tax on earnings will be increased to 50 percent. On a single graph, draw Mark's original budget line and his budget line under the negative income tax. Show that Mark will work fewer hours if the negative income tax is implemented Will Mark's utility be greater under the negative income tax? Discuss your answer.
Can you please help me?
Recall the power law: Y=kX-a or equivalently logY=logk-alog.X Suppose that using the data, you plug in households' incomes into X, and the percentile of the households when ranked by incomes into Y. You find that a=1. Which of the following are true? Question 3 Select one or more: a. In the longer-run, the slope, a, is likely to become higher than 1. b. Incomes should follow a log-normal distribution, so the distribution of log(incomes) should have a bell-shape. c. The slope, a=1, indicates that the U.K. is in a long-run steady state. d. Incomes explode proportionately at the top with rank, so logging them by rank makes it easier to understand the income differences between very rich people. e. A smaller value of a means less income concentration.
An economist is interested in how the price of a certain item affects its monthly sales. At a price of $p, a quantity, q, of the item is sold each month. Suppose that we write q=D(p). Using complete and descriptive sentences, explain the meaning of each of the following statements: a) D(500) = 2,000. b) D'(500) =-25.