Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Math
Calculus
Šubject 1: Gains from Trade Greece and Finland produce and consume two goods, timber (T) and dairy product (D). Labor is the sole factor of production in the two countries. Greece is endowed with Lº = 30,000 labor hours (1. hrs) and Finland is endowed with L =15,000 labor hours (1. hrs). In Greece it takes one (1) 1. hr to produce a ton of good (T), and one fourth (1/4) of a 1. hr to produce a ton of good (D). In Finland, labor productivity in good (T) is twice as high as labor productivity in good (T) in Greece, and labor productivity in good (D) is twenty-five percent (25%) lower relative to labor productivity in good (D) in Greece. Consumer preferences in the two countries are rigid in the sense that whatever the relative prices of the two goods are, residents in Greece always consume three-fourths (3/4) of the country's production, and residents in Finland consume two-thirds (2/3) of its production. a. What is the opportunity cost of the two goods in the two countries? b. Derive the algebraic expression for each country's Production Possibilities Curve (PPC), Of = Q (0%). j = F,G. c. Suppose the two countries engage in international trade, and that the international relative price of good (T) is 3 tons of good (D). Can there be mutually beneficial international trade between the two countries? If so, which are the patterns of comparative advantage, of production and consumption, of exports and imports between the two countries? What are the gains from trade for each country? d. Calculate the relative wage between the two countries, and briefly comment on your finding.

Šubject 1: Gains from Trade Greece and Finland produce and consume two goods, timber (T) and dairy product (D). Labor is the sole factor of production in the two countries. Greece is endowed with Lº = 30,000 labor hours (1. hrs) and Finland is endowed with L =15,000 labor hours (1. hrs). In Greece it takes one (1) 1. hr to produce a ton of good (T), and one fourth (1/4) of a 1. hr to produce a ton of good (D). In Finland, labor productivity in good (T) is twice as high as labor productivity in good (T) in Greece, and labor productivity in good (D) is twenty-five percent (25%) lower relative to labor productivity in good (D) in Greece. Consumer preferences in the two countries are rigid in the sense that whatever the relative prices of the two goods are, residents in Greece always consume three-fourths (3/4) of the country's production, and residents in Finland consume two-thirds (2/3) of its production. a. What is the opportunity cost of the two goods in the two countries? b. Derive the algebraic expression for each country's Production Possibilities Curve (PPC), Of = Q (0%). j = F,G. c. Suppose the two countries engage in international trade, and that the international relative price of good (T) is 3 tons of good (D). Can there be mutually beneficial international trade between the two countries? If so, which are the patterns of comparative advantage, of production and consumption, of exports and imports between the two countries? What are the gains from trade for each country? d. Calculate the relative wage between the two countries, and briefly comment on your finding.

Calculus: Early Transcendentals
Calculus: Early Transcendentals
8th Edition
ISBN:9781285741550
Author:James Stewart
Publisher:James Stewart
Chapter1: Functions And Models
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RCC: (a) What is a function? What are its domain and range? (b) What is the graph of a function? (c) How...
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
Subject 1: Gains from Trade Greece and Finland produce and consume two goods, timber (T) and dairy product (D). Labor is the sole factor of production in the two countries. Greece is endowed with L = 30,000 labor hours (1. hrs) and Finland is endowed with I =15,000 labor hours (1. hrs). In Greece it takes one (1) 1. hr to produce a ton of good (T), and one fourth (1/4) of a 1. hr to produce a ton of good (D). In Finland, labor productivity in good (T) is twice as high as labor productivity in good (T) in Greece, and labor productivity in good (D) is twenty-five percent (25%) lower relative to labor productivity in good (D) in Greece. Consumer preferences in the two countries are rigid in the sense that whatever the relative prices of the two goods are, residents in Greece always consume three-fourths (3/4) of the country's production, and residents in Finland consume two-thirds (2/3) of its production. a. What is the opportunity cost of the two goods in the two countries? b. Derive the algebraic expression for each country's Production Possibilities Curve (PPC), OF = Q (2). j = F,G. c. Suppose the two countries engage in international trade, and that the international relative price of good (T) is 3 tons of good (D). Can there be mutually beneficial international trade between the two countries? If so, which are the patterns of comparative advantage, of production and consumption, of exports and imports between the two countries? What are the gains from trade for each country? d. Calculate the relative wage between the two countries, and briefly comment on your finding.
Transcribed Image Text:Subject 1: Gains from Trade Greece and Finland produce and consume two goods, timber (T) and dairy product (D). Labor is the sole factor of production in the two countries. Greece is endowed with L = 30,000 labor hours (1. hrs) and Finland is endowed with I =15,000 labor hours (1. hrs). In Greece it takes one (1) 1. hr to produce a ton of good (T), and one fourth (1/4) of a 1. hr to produce a ton of good (D). In Finland, labor productivity in good (T) is twice as high as labor productivity in good (T) in Greece, and labor productivity in good (D) is twenty-five percent (25%) lower relative to labor productivity in good (D) in Greece. Consumer preferences in the two countries are rigid in the sense that whatever the relative prices of the two goods are, residents in Greece always consume three-fourths (3/4) of the country's production, and residents in Finland consume two-thirds (2/3) of its production. a. What is the opportunity cost of the two goods in the two countries? b. Derive the algebraic expression for each country's Production Possibilities Curve (PPC), OF = Q (2). j = F,G. c. Suppose the two countries engage in international trade, and that the international relative price of good (T) is 3 tons of good (D). Can there be mutually beneficial international trade between the two countries? If so, which are the patterns of comparative advantage, of production and consumption, of exports and imports between the two countries? What are the gains from trade for each country? d. Calculate the relative wage between the two countries, and briefly comment on your finding.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Calculus: Early Transcendentals
Calculus: Early Transcendentals
Calculus
ISBN:
9781285741550
Author:
James Stewart
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Thomas' Calculus (14th Edition)
Thomas' Calculus (14th Edition)
Calculus
ISBN:
9780134438986
Author:
Joel R. Hass, Christopher E. Heil, Maurice D. Weir
Publisher:
PEARSON
Calculus: Early Transcendentals (3rd Edition)
Calculus: Early Transcendentals (3rd Edition)
Calculus
ISBN:
9780134763644
Author:
William L. Briggs, Lyle Cochran, Bernard Gillett, Eric Schulz
Publisher:
PEARSON
Calculus: Early Transcendentals
Calculus: Early Transcendentals
Calculus
ISBN:
9781319050740
Author:
Jon Rogawski, Colin Adams, Robert Franzosa
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Precalculus
Precalculus
Calculus
ISBN:
9780135189405
Author:
Michael Sullivan
Publisher:
PEARSON
Calculus: Early Transcendental Functions
Calculus: Early Transcendental Functions
Calculus
ISBN:
9781337552516
Author:
Ron Larson, Bruce H. Edwards
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS