Given relations PROJ and ASG in Fig. 2.2 in our textbook, let p1: LOC ≤ "New York" and p2: LOC > "New York" be two simple predicates. Assume that character strings have an order among them, based on the alphabetical order. Perform a horizontal fragmentation of PROJ with respect to these predicates to obtain PROJ1 and PROJ2. Using the fragmentation of PROJ, perform further derived horizontal fragmentation for ASG. Place each row of ASG, (1) to (10), under the appropriate fragment.**ASG Table:**| ENO | PNO | RESP | DUR ||-----|-----|------------|-----|| E1 | P1 | Manager | 12 || E2 | P1 | Analyst | 24 || E2 | P2 | Analyst | 6 || E3 | P3 | Consultant | 10 || E3 | P4 | Engineer | 48 || E4 | P2 | Programmer | 18 || E5 | P2 | Programmer | 24 || E6 | P4 | Manager | 48 || E7 | P3 | Engineer | 36 || E8 | P3 | Manager | 40 |**ASG1 and ASG2:**- ASG1: No Answers Chosen- ASG2: No Answers Chosen**Possible Answers:**(6), (9), (3), (1), (4), (10), (5), (7), (8), (2)The task involves sorting each row of the ASG table into ASG1 or ASG2 based on the fragmentation of PROJ. The solutions have not been provided in this display. The image contains a series of tables categorizing employees, their assignments, projects, and pay details. Below is a detailed transcription of each table:**EMP (Employee Details):**| ENO | ENAME | TITLE ||-----|-----------|-------------|| E1 | J. Doe | Elect. Eng. || E2 | M. Smith | Syst. Anal. || E3 | A. Lee | Mech. Eng. || E4 | J. Miller | Programmer || E5 | B. Casey | Syst. Anal. || E6 | L. Chu | Elect. Eng. || E7 | R. Davis | Mech. Eng. || E8 | J. Jones | Syst. Anal. |**ASG (Assignments):**| ENO | PNO | RESP | DUR ||-----|-----|------------|-----|| E1 | P1 | Manager | 12 || E2 | P1 | Analyst | 24 || E2 | P2 | Analyst | 6 || E3 | P3 | Consultant | 10 || E3 | P4 | Engineer | 48 || E4 | P2 | Programmer | 18 || E5 | P2 | Manager | 24 || E6 | P4 | Manager | 48 || E7 | P3 | Engineer | 36 || E8 | P3 | Manager | 40 |**PROJ (Projects):**| PNO | PNAME | BUDGET | LOC ||-----|----------------------|--------|----------|| P1 | Instrumentation | 150000 | Montreal || P2 | Database Develop. | 135000 | New York || P3 | CAD/CAM | 250000 | New York || P4 | Maintenance | 310000 | Paris |**PAY (Pay Scale):**| TITLE | SAL ||------------|------|| Elect. Eng.| 40000|| Syst. Anal.| 34000|| Me

siven relations PRO New York and pz: in Fig. 2.2 in our textbook, "New York be two simple predic edicates. Assu that aracter strings have an order among them, based on the alphabetical order. Perform a horizontal fragmentation of PROJ with respect to these predicates to obtain PROJ1 and PROJ2. Using the fragmentation of PROJ, perform further derived horizontal fragmentation for ASG. Place each row of ASG, (1) to (10), under the appropriate fragment. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) ASG ENO PNO RESP -~~**** E1 P1 E2 P1 E2 P2 E3 P3 E3 P4 E4 P2 E5 P2 P4 E6 Manager Analyst Analyst Consultant Manager Manager E7 P3 Engineer P3 Manager E8 DUR 12 24 6 10 48 Engineer Programmer 18 24 48 36 40

siven relations PRO New York and pz: in Fig. 2.2 in our textbook, "New York be two simple predic edicates. Assu that aracter strings have an order among them, based on the alphabetical order. Perform a horizontal fragmentation of PROJ with respect to these predicates to obtain PROJ1 and PROJ2. Using the fragmentation of PROJ, perform further derived horizontal fragmentation for ASG. Place each row of ASG, (1) to (10), under the appropriate fragment. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) ASG ENO PNO RESP -~~**** E1 P1 E2 P1 E2 P2 E3 P3 E3 P4 E4 P2 E5 P2 P4 E6 Manager Analyst Analyst Consultant Manager Manager E7 P3 Engineer P3 Manager E8 DUR 12 24 6 10 48 Engineer Programmer 18 24 48 36 40

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Q5 (a) Reduce the grammar to Chomsky Normal Form. SzaAB|caB AnzaCb| bbA B→ cb| Ac C→ id
Consider the following CFG’s. Prove they are ambiguous with the help of derivation as well as parse tree (Take any sample string that can be developed using respective CFG). S à AB | A | B A à a A | Ɛ B à b B | Ɛ
Compute the bigram count table, C(w2|w1) for the sentence "I saw Susie sitting in a shoe shine shop. Where Susie sits Susie shines, and where Susie shines Susie sits." Put w1 in the left hand column, and w2 in the top row. Include punctuation, clitics, and sentence start and end markers as individual tokens, and index words using their lemmatized forms
Soundness theorem for the Intuitionistic Propositional Logic (IPL) states that "if & FA is provable in IPL, then the map [] → [A]" could be defined in the category Cp induced by any |cartesian closed preorder (P, <). Represent the IPL formula “A→B, B = CEA=C" into any Cp, and form the corresponding map. Hint. the interpretation function [:]: IPL → Cp
3. Formalize the following arguments in L1 providing a suitabledictionary. Make your formalization as detailed as possible. Ifyou find an ambiguity in the argument, explain it to justifyyour choice of formalization. (c) It’s not true that time travel is possible. For if I travelback in time and kill my grandfather, I will be born andunborn. But I will not be born and unborn. And I willtravel back in time and kill my grandfather, provided timetravel is possible.
Please answer Question 5, Question 4 is used as a reference Pls send me solution fast within 20 min and i will rate instantly for sure!! Solution must be in typed form!!
Consider the following 2-NFA. Regular Expressions, Nondeterministic & Deterministic Finite Automaton All based on above lambda NFA. What is a regular expression that can describe ALL strings accepted by the automaton? Utilize a subset construction to construct deterministic finite automaton that accepts the same language. Specify the transition table and the start and accepting states. Concisely, how can you use reachability in the graph to reduce number of states as much as possible. How many states would that result in? Please Illustrate the resulting DFA (with the reduced # of states)
Urgent Requirement Given the above languages: (a) Use the set operators ‘union' and 'complement to describe L5 = L; n L2. (b) Prove that L; is regular. (c) Construct an NFA M that accepts L5, and prove its correctness. (d) Convert such NFA (from question above) to a DFA using the algorithm from class. (e) Given the DFA you’ve designed in Q3(d), what is 5(s, au), for u € *. What is G(s, buaa), for U e I*. Justify your answers. Note that s is the starting state of the given DFA.
Please solve very soon completely
Problem 3: Consider the grammar S → aSlaSbS|e. This grammar is ambiguous. (a) Show in particular that the string aab has two parse trees. (b) Generate an unambiguous grammar for the language generated by the given grammar.