Solve 30-40 minutes hand written asap..i'll rate The graph below shows a consumer's tradeoff between safety-related effortand their expected loss before and after safety-cap regulations. ELo is the actual ex-pected loss before the regulation, EL, is the actual expected loss after the regulation,and EL₂ is the consumer's perceived expected loss after the regulation.ExpectedLossELOELEL20Safety EffortIf the consumer selects point A before safety cap regulation, what can we say about theconsumer's safety outcome after the regulation?I If the consumer maintains the same safety effort, then they will actually move topoint C.II If the consumer believes they are at point D, then the actual expected loss is higherafter the regulation.A. Only IB. Only IIIC. I and IID. Neither I nor II

The trade-off is one of the basic principles of economics. The event of foregoing one opportunity…

shows a consumer's tradeoff between safety-related effort and their expected loss before and after safety-cap regulations. ELo is the actual ex- pected loss before the regulation, EL, is the actual expected loss after the regulation, and EL₂ is the consumer's perceived expected loss after the regulation. Expected Loss 0 D Safety Effort ELO ELI EL2 If the consumer selects point A before safety cap regulation, what can we say about the consumer's safety outcome after the regulation? I If the consumer maintains the same safety effort, then they will actually move to point C. II If the consumer believes they are at point D, then the actual expected loss is higher after the regulation. A. Only I B. Only II C. I and II D. Neither I nor II

shows a consumer's tradeoff between safety-related effort and their expected loss before and after safety-cap regulations. ELo is the actual ex- pected loss before the regulation, EL, is the actual expected loss after the regulation, and EL₂ is the consumer's perceived expected loss after the regulation. Expected Loss 0 D Safety Effort ELO ELI EL2 If the consumer selects point A before safety cap regulation, what can we say about the consumer's safety outcome after the regulation? I If the consumer maintains the same safety effort, then they will actually move to point C. II If the consumer believes they are at point D, then the actual expected loss is higher after the regulation. A. Only I B. Only II C. I and II D. Neither I nor II

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter7: Uncertainty

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 7.5P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

You and a coworker are assigned a team project on which your likelihood or a promotion will be decidedon. It is now the night before the project is due and neither has yet to start it. You both want toreceive a promotion next year, but you both also want to go to your company’s holiday party that night.Each of you wants to maximize his or her own happiness (likelihood of a promotion and mingling withyour colleagues “on the company’s dime”). If you both work, you deliver an outstanding presentation.If you both go to the party, your presentation is mediocre. If one parties and the other works, yourpresentation is above average. Partying increases happiness by 25 units. Working on the project addszero units to happiness. Happiness is also affected by your chance of a promotion, which is depends on howgood your project is. An outstanding presentation gives 40 units of happiness to each of you; an aboveaverage presentation gives 30 units of happiness; a mediocre presentation gives 10 units…
Suppose Grace and Lisa are to go to dinner. Lisa is visiting Grace from outof town, and they are to meet at a local restaurant. When Lisa lived in town,they had two favorite restaurants: Bel Loc Diner and the Corner Stable. Ofcourse, Lisa’s information is out of date, but Grace knows which is betterthese days. Assume that the probability that the Bel Loc Diner is better isp > 1/2 and the probability that the Corner Stable is better is 1 - p. Naturedetermines which restaurant Grace thinks is better. Grace then sends amessage to Lisa, either “Let’s go to the Bel Loc Diner,” “Let’s go to theCorner Stable,” or “I don’t know [which is better].” Lisa receives the message, and then Grace and Lisa simultaneously decide which restaurant to go to. Payoffs are such that Grace and Lisa want to go to the same restaurant, but they prefer it to be the one that Grace thinks is better. More specifically, if, in fact, the Bel Loc Diner is better, then the payoffs from theiractions are as shown in the…
Assuming you are risk neutral, frast answer the folowing two questions about your preferences: Scenario A: You are given $5.000 and offered a choice beheeen receiving an extra $2.500 with certainty or fipping a coin and getting $5.000 t heads or S0 if tain. Which option do you prefer? A The certain $2.500 is more valuable than the uncertain $5.000, I would choose the $2.500 Both options have identical payofs, so l am indiferent between the two options. The possibility of the 5.000 payoff is more valuable to me than the oertain $2.500, I chocse to fio a coin Scenario B. You are given $10.000 f you wil make the following choice: retum $2.500 or fip a coin and retum $5.000 heads and so tai. Which opton do you prefer? A The certain los of S$2.500 is more paintu than the possible loss of $5,000, I choose to fip a coin. OR The ponsibility of the los of $5.000 is more paintul to me than the certain los of $2.500, I would choose the $2.500 certan loss re Both options have identical payoffs, so…
Suppose, unfortunately, your mathematics andeconomics professors have decided to give teststwo days from now and you can spend a total ofonly twelve hours studying for both exams. Aftersome thought, you conclude that dividing yourstudy time equally between each subject will giveyou an expected grade of C in each course. Foreach additional three hours of study time for oneof the subjects, your grade will increase one letterfor that subject, and your grade will fall oneletter for the other subject.48 PART 1 • Introduction to EconomicsCopyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.a.…
Suppose that the buyers do not know the quality of any particular bicycle for sale, but the sellers do knowthe quality of the bike they sell. The price at which a bike is traded is determined by demand and supply.Each buyer wants at most one bicycle.(ii) Assuming that each buyer purchases a bike only if its expected quality is higher than the price,and each seller is willing to sell their bike only if the price exceeds their valuation, what is theequilibrium outcome in this market?
Which of he following stalements about lhe Time Limil on Certain Defenses provision in an Accident and Heallh policy is CORRECT? A.It specifies the period of time after which an insurance company can deny a claim on he basis of the claim having pre-existed before the effective dale of coverage. B.It specifies the period of lime during which the insured must submit Proof of Loss. C.It prohibits legal actions against the insurance company after a specified period of time. D.It prevents an insurance company from maki any changes to a policy after il is issued.
a Suppose you are given a choice between thefollowing options:A1: Win $30 for sureA2: 80% chance of winning $45 and 20% chance ofA2: winning nothing B1: 25% chance of winning $30B2: 20% chance of winning $45Most people prefer A1 to A2 and B2 to B1. Explainwhy this behavior violates the assumption that decisionmakers maximize expected utility.b Now suppose you play the following game: You havea 75% chance of winning nothing and a 25% chance ofplaying the second stage of the game. If you reach thesecond stage, you have a choice of two options (C1 andC2), but your choice must be made now, before youreach the second stage.C1: Win $30 for sureC2: 80% chance of winning $45 13.5 Bayes’ Rule and Decision Trees 767Most people choose C1 over C2 and B2 to B1 (from part(a)). Explain why this again violates the assumption ofexpected utility maximization. Tversky and Kahneman(1981) speculate that most people are attracted to thesure $30 in the second stage, even though the secondstage may never be…
Why is there asymmetric information in the labor market? What signals can an employer look for that might indicate file traits they are seeking in a new employee?
What is the problem of moral hazard?
When company executives buy and sell stock basedon private information they obtain as part of theirjobs, they arc engaged in insider lmding.:t Give an example of inside information that mi~;htbe useful for buying or selling stock.h. "rho,::,.. who trnriP "'tnrh hMM nn in"irlPinformation usuaUy cam very high rates ofreturn. Docs this fact violate the efficient marketshypothesis?c. Insider trading is illegal. Why do you supposethat is?
Johnny is "paid" by his parents $2o if he gets a grade A, $10 if he gets a grade B, whereas he has to pay his parents back $5 if he gets a grade other than A or B. On average 20% of the grades he gets are A, and 30% are grades B. What is the expected value of what he "earns" per grade ? What is the expected value of what he "earns" at school weekly if on average he gets five grades a week ? How long should Jim save until he collects enough money to buy a pair of brand new Hi-Fi headphones that cost $225?
Suppose that the University of Alabama and Clemson are making spending decisions for theupcoming year. Assume that Alabama is currently spending $15 million on their recruiting andfacilities, and Clemson is spending $10 million. Each team has an additional $5 million to spendor keep as profits. If they both choose to not spend the additional $5 million then Alabama hasa 60% chance of getting the highest quality quarterback recruit to commit to them (getting thecommitment of the player is the goal). However, if they both choose to spend the additional $5million then there is a 57% chance that Alabama gets the high quality quarterback to commit. IfAlabama spends the additional $5 million but Clemson doesn’t then there is a 67% chanceAlabama gets the recruit. However, if Alabama does NOT spend the additional $5million butClemson does then there is a 50% change either team gets the recruit’s commitment. Setup thepayoff matrix and label the players, their strategies, and their payoffs, and…