The impact of a firm's cost of capital on managerial decisionsConsider the following case:Marston Manufacturing Company has two divisions, L and H. Division L is the company's low-risk division and would have a weightedaverage cost of capital of 8% if it was operated as an independent company. Division H is the company's high-risk division and wouldhave a weighted average cost of capital of 14% if it was operated as an independent company. Because the two divisions are the samesize, the company has a composite weighted average cost of capital of 11%. Division L is considering a project with an expected returnof 9.5%.Should Marston Manufacturing Company accept or reject the project?O Reject the projectO Accept the projectOn what grounds do you base your accept-reject decision?O Division L's project should be accepted, since its return is greater than the risk-based cost of capital for the division.O Division L's project should be accepted, because its return is less than the risk-based cost of capital for the division.

A project should be accepted if its expected return is higher than its WACC. The appropriate WACC to…

Should Marston Manufacturing Company accept or reject the project? O Reject the project O Accept the project On what grounds do you base your accept-reject decision? O Division L's project should be accepted, since its return is greater than the risk-based cost of capital for the division. O Division L's project should be accepted, because its return is less than the risk-based cost of capital for the division.

Should Marston Manufacturing Company accept or reject the project? O Reject the project O Accept the project On what grounds do you base your accept-reject decision? O Division L's project should be accepted, since its return is greater than the risk-based cost of capital for the division. O Division L's project should be accepted, because its return is less than the risk-based cost of capital for the division.

Essentials Of Investments

11th Edition

ISBN:9781260013924

Author:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.

Publisher:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.

Chapter1: Investments: Background And Issues

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PS

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

solve this parctie problem
Select all that are true with respect to the NPV rule for making capital investment decisions. Group of answer choices When done correctly, NPV directly measures expected value creation NPV ignores cash flows in the distant future NPV causes decision makers to be myopic For independent projects, all positive NPV projects should be taken, and negative NPV projects should not be taken For mutually exclusive projects, choose the project with the highest NPV
I think question 3 is not answered clearly. If Project A is rejected due to negative NPV, then all positive NPVs projects should be accepted. The answer is not clear. Please correct me if I am missing something. Question 3) If the firm uses the discounted-payback rule, will it accept any negative NPV projects? Will it turn down any positive NPV projects? How do you know? Your answer is: No Due to Project A's negative NPV, it cannot cover the initial investment within its useful life. Will it turn down any positive NPV projects? It will reject projects with positive NPVs but not those with negative NPVs. If all potential cash flows are taken into account but the project still doesn't reach the designated cutoff point, the NPV can still be positive.
1) What is the company's WACC? 2) Should the company take the projects? Assume that the projects have the same risk as an average project for your firm. 3) If one project is depended on the other in a way that the company can only take both projects, should it take it?
WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT IS CORRECT?
None
When negotlating a transfer price, whlch prlce Is most acceptable to the selling divislon if they are operating with Idle capacity? Multiple Choicel the price must cover at least the variable manufacturing costs of the selling division the price must be less than the variable manufacturing costs of the selling division the price must cover at least the variable manufacturing costs of the buying division the price must cover at least the selling price to outside customers
Which of the following were listed as potential Problems or Issues associated with Using a Rate of Return Approach to justifying single or multiple Mutually Exclusive projects? Note: This is a Multiple Answer question. Please select all of the following options you think are correct? O The ROR calculations are typically more complex than the PW, AW, or FW methods and frequently require the use of trial and error techniques. O You cannot rely on the best Mutually Exclusive project to have the highest ROR. O An incremental approach is required to reliably determine the best project when comparing multiple Mutually Exclusive projects with the ROR approach. O This method assumes that any net positive cash flows are reinvested at the ROR rate. If the ROR rate is substantially larger than MARR, this might not be a realistic assumption. OFor any sequence of Net Cash Flows with more than one sign chance over the life of the project there may be more than one ROR value that satisfies the Rate…
Current Design Co. is considering two mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable projects, S and L. Their cash flows are shown below. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates the NPV. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much, if any, value will be forgone, i.e., what's the chosen NPV versus the maximum possible NPV? Note that (1) "true value" is measured by NPV, and (2) under some conditions the choice of IRR vs. NPV will have no effect on the value gained or lost. r: 8% Year CFS CFL $149.21 $130.31 $121.42 $101.96 $98.10 0 -$1,200 -$2,800 $700 $600 2 $600 $735 3 $150 $700 4 $110 $1,800

Recommended textbooks for you

Essentials Of Investments

Finance

ISBN:

9781260013924

Author:

Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.

Publisher:

Mcgraw-hill Education,

FUNDAMENTALS OF CORPORATE FINANCE

Finance

ISBN:

9781260013962

Author:

BREALEY

Publisher:

RENT MCG

Financial Management: Theory & Practice

Finance

ISBN:

9781337909730

Author:

Brigham

Publisher:

Cengage

Foundations Of Finance

Finance

ISBN:

9780134897264

Author:

KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. William

Publisher:

Pearson,

Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou…

Finance

ISBN:

9781337395250

Author:

Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. Houston

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Corporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i…

Finance

ISBN:

9780077861759

Author:

Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan Professor

Publisher:

McGraw-Hill Education

Essentials Of Investments

Finance

ISBN:

9781260013924

Author:

Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.

Publisher:

Mcgraw-hill Education,

FUNDAMENTALS OF CORPORATE FINANCE

Finance

ISBN:

9781260013962

Author:

BREALEY

Publisher:

RENT MCG

Financial Management: Theory & Practice

Finance

ISBN:

9781337909730

Author:

Brigham

Publisher:

Cengage

Foundations Of Finance

Finance

ISBN:

9780134897264

Author:

KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. William

Publisher:

Pearson,

Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou…

Finance

ISBN:

9781337395250

Author:

Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. Houston

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Corporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i…

Finance

ISBN:

9780077861759

Author:

Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan Professor

Publisher:

McGraw-Hill Education

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS