Safer 1965 report on burning of a village-   In 1965, was this report in the zone of consensus, the zone of legitimate controversy, or the zone of deviance? You must pick one of the three. Defend your answer with evidence from Safer’s report, from what he says about the reaction to the report, and what else you know or can find out about reaction to the report.

icon
Related questions
Question

Safer 1965 report on burning of a village-

 

In 1965, was this report in the zone of consensus, the zone of legitimate controversy, or the zone of deviance? You must pick one of the three. Defend your answer with evidence from Safer’s report, from what he says about the reaction to the report, and what else you know or can find out about reaction to the report.

**Title: Understanding Media Dynamics: Hallin's Spheres and Government Policies**

*Introduction to Hallin's Spheres*

Hallin’s chart illustrates when mainstream US news media challenges American government policies. It categorizes how the media covers different kinds of issues based on their level of acceptance within government and public opinion.

*Sphere of Consensus*

The innermost circle represents the "sphere of consensus." This includes topics with widespread agreement among government entities such as the military and Congress. For instance, when US troops moved into South Vietnam in 1965, the idea of combating Communism was in this sphere. There was little to no media questioning about the necessity of this fight.

*Sphere of Deviance*

The outermost circle, known as the "sphere of deviance," includes ideas not broadly accepted, often rejected by major government bodies. These views are seen as extreme or radical. For example, in 1965, the notion that the US should exit Vietnam was considered deviant. When the media reported on these ideas, they were treated with skepticism or ridicule, and the groups advocating these ideas were seen as extremists.

*Sphere of Legitimate Controversy*

Between these two spheres lies the "sphere of legitimate controversy." This area includes topics of disagreement among key governmental figures and entities. Media coverage here is extensive, reflecting debates within the White House, military, and Congress. For example, dissent over the Vietnam War grew within the elite in 1968, particularly during the Tet Offensive. Once prominent figures expressed doubts, media coverage increased, recognizing anti-war positions as serious and legitimate.

*Conclusion*

Hallin’s model shows how media coverage shifts based on the level of consensus or controversy among influential groups. Understanding these dynamics helps explain how and when media may critique governmental decisions and influence public perception.
Transcribed Image Text:**Title: Understanding Media Dynamics: Hallin's Spheres and Government Policies** *Introduction to Hallin's Spheres* Hallin’s chart illustrates when mainstream US news media challenges American government policies. It categorizes how the media covers different kinds of issues based on their level of acceptance within government and public opinion. *Sphere of Consensus* The innermost circle represents the "sphere of consensus." This includes topics with widespread agreement among government entities such as the military and Congress. For instance, when US troops moved into South Vietnam in 1965, the idea of combating Communism was in this sphere. There was little to no media questioning about the necessity of this fight. *Sphere of Deviance* The outermost circle, known as the "sphere of deviance," includes ideas not broadly accepted, often rejected by major government bodies. These views are seen as extreme or radical. For example, in 1965, the notion that the US should exit Vietnam was considered deviant. When the media reported on these ideas, they were treated with skepticism or ridicule, and the groups advocating these ideas were seen as extremists. *Sphere of Legitimate Controversy* Between these two spheres lies the "sphere of legitimate controversy." This area includes topics of disagreement among key governmental figures and entities. Media coverage here is extensive, reflecting debates within the White House, military, and Congress. For example, dissent over the Vietnam War grew within the elite in 1968, particularly during the Tet Offensive. Once prominent figures expressed doubts, media coverage increased, recognizing anti-war positions as serious and legitimate. *Conclusion* Hallin’s model shows how media coverage shifts based on the level of consensus or controversy among influential groups. Understanding these dynamics helps explain how and when media may critique governmental decisions and influence public perception.
- **Hallin’s study found that mainstream news media did not challenge the wisdom of being in Vietnam until government elites were sharply disputing whether to negotiate with the Communists and withdraw from the war.** 

This text summarizes findings from a study by Hallin, indicating that the media initially supported the Vietnam War, reflecting government perspectives, until significant political debate emerged about negotiating peace and withdrawal. 

There are no graphs or diagrams to explain in this image.
Transcribed Image Text:- **Hallin’s study found that mainstream news media did not challenge the wisdom of being in Vietnam until government elites were sharply disputing whether to negotiate with the Communists and withdraw from the war.** This text summarizes findings from a study by Hallin, indicating that the media initially supported the Vietnam War, reflecting government perspectives, until significant political debate emerged about negotiating peace and withdrawal. There are no graphs or diagrams to explain in this image.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer